Butz A M, Eggleston P, Huss K, Kolodner K, Rand C
Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287-3144, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Oct;154(10):984-90. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.10.984.
To assess the frequency of nebulizer use, describe morbidity and patterns of medication administration, and examine the potential relationships between inhaled anti-inflammatory medication administration, asthma morbidity, and asthma management practices in children with asthma using a nebulizer compared with children with asthma not using a nebulizer.
A cross-sectional, descriptive survey of previous events.
Elementary schools and participants' homes in Baltimore, Md, and Washington, DC.
Six hundred eighty-six families of children aged 5 to 12 years with a diagnosis of at least mild, persistent asthma.
None.
Asthma morbidity, health care utilization, pattern of asthma medication administration, nebulizer use, and asthma management data were collected by telephone survey administered to caregivers. Nebulizer use was defined as use at least 1 or more days per month during the last 6 months. Of 686 children identified, 231 (33%) reported current nebulizer use. Nebulizer users had significantly increased lifetime hospital admissions, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits in the last 6 months compared with nonnebulizer users. Inhaled corticosteroid administration was low for both groups (nonnebulizer users, 8%; nebulizer users, 15%). In the nebulizer users group, administration of inhaled anti-inflammatory medications was associated with increased asthma morbidity (increased hospitalizations, days and nights with symptoms, and oral steroid use).
Nebulizer use by inner-city children with asthma is higher than anticipated but is not associated with reduced asthma morbidity. This group of high-risk children was undertreated with inhaled corticosteroids for long-term control of asthma despite reports of adequate monitoring by a primary care physician.
评估雾化器的使用频率,描述发病情况及药物给药模式,并比较使用雾化器的哮喘儿童与未使用雾化器的哮喘儿童在吸入抗炎药物给药、哮喘发病情况及哮喘管理措施之间的潜在关系。
对既往事件的横断面描述性调查。
马里兰州巴尔的摩市和华盛顿特区的小学及参与者家中。
686名年龄在5至12岁、诊断为至少轻度持续性哮喘的儿童家庭。
无。
通过对照顾者进行电话调查收集哮喘发病情况、医疗保健利用情况、哮喘药物给药模式、雾化器使用情况及哮喘管理数据。雾化器使用定义为在过去6个月中每月至少使用1天或更多天。在686名确定的儿童中,231名(33%)报告目前正在使用雾化器。与未使用雾化器的儿童相比,使用雾化器的儿童在过去6个月中的终身住院次数、住院天数及急诊就诊次数显著增加。两组吸入糖皮质激素的给药率均较低(未使用雾化器的儿童为8%;使用雾化器的儿童为15%)。在使用雾化器的儿童组中,吸入抗炎药物的给药与哮喘发病率增加相关(住院次数增加、有症状的白天和夜晚天数增加以及口服类固醇药物的使用增加)。
城市中心哮喘儿童的雾化器使用率高于预期,但与哮喘发病率降低无关。尽管有初级保健医生进行充分监测的报告,但这组高危儿童在长期控制哮喘方面吸入糖皮质激素治疗不足。