Suppr超能文献

雾化吸入β2受体激动剂在高危城市中心哮喘成年患者中的应用。

Nebulized beta2-agonist use in high-risk inner-city adults with asthma.

作者信息

Krishnan Jerry A, Demott Megan, McCoy Jonathan V, Chanmugam Arjun, Rand Cynthia S

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2003 Jun;40(4):367-73. doi: 10.1081/jas-120018636.

Abstract

Nebulizer use has been linked to worse asthma outcomes, but the precise reason(s) for this relationship is not known. We assessed the frequency of nebulized beta2-agonist use in high-risk inner-city adults with asthma and compared asthma self-management practices according to nebulizer use in this population. This was a cross-sectional study conducted over 6 weeks from July to August 2000. A convenience sample (N=50) was recruited from an inner-city emergency department (ED). Adults (age > or = 18 years) were eligible if they had a physician diagnosis of acute asthma exacerbation. Data regarding asthma symptoms, acute care utilization, use of nebulized beta2-agonist for symptom relief, and indicators of asthma self-management (physician for asthma care, use of controller medications, current cigarette smoking, and substance use) were collected by an interviewer-administered survey. Nebulized beta2-agonist use was reported by 54.0% of patients during the 30 days before their ED visit. Nebulizer users reported more severe asthma symptoms (96.3% vs. 73.9% with moderate or severe persistent asthma, p=0.02) than nonusers. Nebulizer users were more likely to have a physician for asthma care (85.2% vs. 56.5%, p=0.02), have more frequent care from their physicians in the past 12 months (e.g., >3 visits: 59.3% vs. 30.4%, p=0.02), and notify their physician during their asthma exacerbation (39.1% vs. 7.7%, p=0.04). Compared with nonusers, nebulizer users reported better care across other indicators of care, though differences between groups were not significant. After accounting for symptom severity, results were largely unchanged. If these findings are confirmed in other studies with larger numbers of patients, we conclude that the relationship between nebulizer use and higher asthma morbidity largely represents preferential use of nebulizers by patients with more symptomatic disease.

摘要

雾化器的使用与哮喘预后较差有关,但这种关系的确切原因尚不清楚。我们评估了高危城市成年哮喘患者使用雾化β2激动剂的频率,并根据该人群中雾化器的使用情况比较了哮喘自我管理实践。这是一项于2000年7月至8月进行的为期6周的横断面研究。从城市急诊科招募了一个便利样本(N = 50)。年龄大于或等于18岁、经医生诊断为急性哮喘加重的成年人符合入选条件。通过访谈员实施的调查收集了有关哮喘症状、急性护理利用情况、使用雾化β2激动剂缓解症状以及哮喘自我管理指标(哮喘护理医生、控制药物的使用、当前吸烟情况和物质使用情况)的数据。54.0%的患者在急诊就诊前30天内报告使用过雾化β2激动剂。与未使用者相比,雾化器使用者报告的哮喘症状更严重(中度或重度持续性哮喘患者中,使用雾化器者为96.3%,未使用者为73.9%,p = 0.02)。雾化器使用者更有可能有哮喘护理医生(85.2%对56.5%,p = 0.02),在过去12个月中接受医生的护理更频繁(例如,就诊次数>3次:59.3%对30.4%,p = 0.02),并且在哮喘发作时通知医生(39.1%对7.7%,p = 0.04)。与未使用者相比,雾化器使用者在其他护理指标方面报告的护理情况更好,尽管两组之间的差异不显著。在考虑症状严重程度后,结果基本不变。如果这些发现在其他更多患者的研究中得到证实,我们得出结论,雾化器使用与较高的哮喘发病率之间的关系很大程度上代表了症状更明显的患者对雾化器的优先使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验