Suppr超能文献

雾化器使用针对性哮喘教育对哮喘未得到充分治疗儿童的有效性。

Effectiveness of nebulizer use-targeted asthma education on underserved children with asthma.

作者信息

Butz Arlene M, Tsoukleris Mona G, Donithan Michele, Hsu Van Doren, Zuckerman Ilene, Mudd Kim Elizabeth, Thompson Richard E, Rand Cindy, Bollinger Mary Elizabeth

机构信息

Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, The Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jun;160(6):622-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.6.622.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a home-based asthma education intervention in increasing appropriate nebulizer use and reducing symptom frequency, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations over 12 months.

DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial. Settings Pediatric primary care, pulmonary/allergy, and ED practices associated with the University of Maryland Medical System and The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore.

PARTICIPANTS

Children with persistent asthma, aged 2 to 9 years, with regular nebulizer use and an ED visit or hospitalization within the past 12 months. Children were randomized into the intervention (n = 110) or control (n = 111) group. Follow-up data were available for 95 intervention and 86 control children.

INTERVENTION

Home-based asthma education, including symptom recognition, home treatment of acute symptoms, appropriate asthma medication, and nebulizer practice.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Estimates of mean differences in asthma symptom frequency, number of ED visits and hospitalizations and appropriate quick relief, controller medication, and nebulizer practice over 12 months.

RESULTS

Of the 221 children, 181 (81.9%) completed the study. There were no significant differences in home nebulizer practice, asthma morbidity, ED visits, or hospitalizations between groups (P range, .11-.79). Although most children received appropriate nonurgent asthma care (mean, 2 visits per 6 months), more than one third of all children received at least 6 quick-relief medication prescriptions during 12 months, with no difference by group.

CONCLUSIONS

A nebulizer education intervention had no effect on asthma severity or health care use. Of concern is the high quick-relief and low controller medication use in young children with asthma seen nearly every 3 months for nonurgent care.

摘要

目的

确定一项以家庭为基础的哮喘教育干预措施在增加雾化器合理使用以及在12个月内减少症状发作频率、急诊就诊次数和住院次数方面的效果。

设计

一项随机临床试验。地点为与马里兰大学医学系统和巴尔的摩约翰霍普金斯医院相关的儿科初级保健、肺科/过敏科及急诊科。

参与者

年龄在2至9岁、持续使用雾化器且在过去12个月内有过急诊就诊或住院经历的持续性哮喘患儿。患儿被随机分为干预组(n = 110)或对照组(n = 111)。有95名干预组患儿和86名对照组患儿的随访数据。

干预措施

以家庭为基础的哮喘教育,包括症状识别、急性症状的家庭治疗、合适的哮喘药物治疗以及雾化器使用练习。

主要观察指标

12个月内哮喘症状发作频率、急诊就诊次数和住院次数的平均差异估计值,以及合理的快速缓解药物、控制药物使用情况和雾化器使用练习情况。

结果

221名患儿中,181名(81.9%)完成了研究。两组在家庭雾化器使用、哮喘发病率、急诊就诊次数或住院次数方面无显著差异(P值范围为0.11 - 0.79)。尽管大多数患儿接受了适当的非紧急哮喘护理(平均每6个月就诊2次),但超过三分之一的患儿在12个月内至少接受了6次快速缓解药物处方,且两组之间无差异。

结论

雾化器教育干预对哮喘严重程度或医疗保健利用无影响。令人担忧的是,患有哮喘的幼儿每近3个月因非紧急护理就诊时,快速缓解药物使用频繁而控制药物使用不足。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of nebulizer use-targeted asthma education on underserved children with asthma.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Jun;160(6):622-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.160.6.622.
2
A randomized controlled trial of parental asthma coaching to improve outcomes among urban minority children.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jun;165(6):520-6. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.57.
3
Nebulizer use in inner-city children with asthma: morbidity, medication use, and asthma management practices.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Oct;154(10):984-90. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.10.984.
5
Dispensing home nebulizers for acute wheezing from the hospital is cost-effective.
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;18(2):164-7. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90010-x.
9
Home nebulizer therapy in asthmatics in Qatar.
J Asthma. 1994;31(1):51-3. doi: 10.3109/02770909409056769.
10
Children with poorly controlled asthma: Randomized controlled trial of a home-based environmental control intervention.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Mar;54(3):245-256. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24239. Epub 2019 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD008469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008469.pub3.
2
Correlation between Aerosol Therapy and Other Associated Factors in Early Childhood with Molar Incisor Hypomineralization.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):554-557. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2429.
3
Meta-Analysis of Adherence Promotion Interventions in Pediatric Asthma.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;46(10):1195-1212. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab057.
4
Recruitment and retention of the Hardest-to-Reach families in community-based asthma interventions.
Clin Trials. 2018 Dec;15(6):543-550. doi: 10.1177/1740774518793598. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
5
Measurement of Anxiety in 3-9 Year Old Children Receiving Nursing Intervention.
J Caring Sci. 2017 Dec 1;6(4):293-302. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2017.028. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
Culture-specific programs for children and adults from minority groups who have asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD006580. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006580.pub5.
7
The Nature of Family Engagement in Interventions for Children With Chronic Conditions.
West J Nurs Res. 2017 May;39(5):690-723. doi: 10.1177/0193945916664700. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
Inner city asthma.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2015 Feb;35(1):101-14. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
9
A cluster-randomized trial shows telephone peer coaching for parents reduces children's asthma morbidity.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 May;135(5):1163-70.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.033. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
10
Improving preventive care in high risk children with asthma: lessons learned.
J Asthma. 2014 Jun;51(5):498-507. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.892608. Epub 2014 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment patterns for pediatric asthma prior to and after emergency department events.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005 Oct;40(4):310-5. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20264.
2
Home-based asthma self-management education for inner city children.
Public Health Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;22(3):189-99. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220302.x.
3
Patterns of asthma control: a 3-year analysis of patient claims.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 May;115(5):935-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.01.054.
4
Monitoring nebulizer use in children: comparison of electronic and asthma diary data.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Mar;94(3):360-5. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60988-X.
5
6
Patient-identified barriers to asthma treatment adherence: responses to interviews, focus groups, and questionnaires.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2005 Feb;25(1):107-30. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2004.09.005.
7
Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 9;351(11):1068-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032097.
8
Contamination of nebulizer equipment with cockroach allergen: there's a bug in the system!
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Apr;92(4):475-7. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61786-3.
9
Nebulized beta2-agonist use in high-risk inner-city adults with asthma.
J Asthma. 2003 Jun;40(4):367-73. doi: 10.1081/jas-120018636.
10
Symptom perception in childhood asthma: how accurate are children and their parents?
J Asthma. 2003 Feb;40(1):27-39. doi: 10.1081/jas-120017204.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验