在单操作和并发程序中测量的强化物选择的影响。
Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
作者信息
Geckeler A S, Libby M E, Graff R B, Ahearn W H
机构信息
The New England Center for Children and Northeastern University, Southborough, Massachusetts 01772, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):347-51. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-347.
Abstract
The effects of choice and no choice of reinforcer on the response rates of 3 children with autism were compared across single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures. No consistent differences in responding between choice and no-choice components emerged during single-operant phases. During the concurrent-schedule phases, however, all participants had substantially higher rates of responding to the button that led to a choice among reinforcers than to the button that did not lead to choice.
摘要
通过单操作和并发程序，比较了强化物选择和无选择对3名自闭症儿童反应率的影响。在单操作阶段，选择和无选择成分之间的反应没有出现一致的差异。然而，在并发程序阶段，所有参与者对导致强化物选择的按钮的反应率都大大高于对不导致选择的按钮的反应率。
相似文献
1
Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.在单操作和并发程序中测量的强化物选择的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):347-51. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-347.
2
Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.人类在双选项快速习得选择任务中的表现。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
3
Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).延迟强化物对注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）动物模型行为的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):47-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.02.034. Epub 2005 Apr 25.
4
Behavioral effects of intra-cranial self-stimulation in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）动物模型中颅内自我刺激的行为效应。
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):32-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.02.033. Epub 2005 Apr 22.
5
Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.孕期接触甲基汞会延缓老龄大鼠过渡阶段的选择能力。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004 Mar-Apr;26(2):179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2003.12.004.
6
Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).对于患有注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）的幼儿来说，不频繁但也并非极少出现的强化物会导致更多变的反应以及持续注意力不足。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 May;47(5):457-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01468.x.
7
The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.匹配法则以及强化物比率和大小对转换选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2008 Jun;78(2):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.12.003. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
8
Behavioral assessment of impulsivity: a comparison of children with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.冲动性的行为评估：患与未患注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的比较
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Spring;38(1):23-37. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.146-02.
9
Modeling the dynamics of choice.模拟选择的动态过程。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
10
Effects of increased response effort and reinforcer delay on choice and aberrant behavior.反应努力增加和强化物延迟对选择及异常行为的影响。
Behav Modif. 2005 Jul;29(4):642-52. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259489.
引用本文的文献
1
Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices.选择与无选择：增加选择的实际考量
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Jan;58(1):100-117. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2920. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Advancing Methods in Animal-Assisted Intervention: Demonstration of Starting Points in Clinical Practice for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.动物辅助干预的先进方法：自闭症谱系障碍儿童临床实践起点的示范
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Apr 11;16(1):145-155. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00704-w. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统（SPADS）：从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
An evaluation of the value of choice-making opportunities in single-operant arrangements: simple fixed- and progressive-ratio schedules.对单操作安排中选择机会价值的评估：简单固定比率和累进比率方案。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):519-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-519.
5
Motivational influences on performance maintained by food reinforcement.食物强化维持的表现的动机性影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Fall;38(3):317-33. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.93-04.
本文引用的文献
1
A comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice.会前与会中强化选择的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Summer;32(2):161-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-161.
2
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.关于选择和差别性后果的相对强化作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
3
Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.强化物选择对发育障碍个体任务反应的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411.
4
Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.对重度智力迟钝个体的刺激偏好和强化物价值的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249-55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
5
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Zotero 插件