Suppr超能文献

喉切除患者的气管食管穿刺结果及成功预测因素

Tracheoesophageal puncture outcomes and predictors of success in laryngectomised patients.

作者信息

Saurajen A S, Chee N W, Siow J K, Lim F, Mok P K, Earnest A

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Ann Acad Med Singap. 2000 Jul;29(4):452-6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prosthetic voice restoration has been widely used for vocal rehabilitation in laryngectomised patients. The objectives of this study were to examine success rates, predictors of success and complications for our patients who had undergone tracheoesophageal punctures (TEPs) and voice prosthesis placement after laryngectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis of the use and complications of TEPs in Singapore.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients seen in our centre were analysed in this retrospective case review. Factors analysed included voice quality with age, timing of insertion, type of closure, use of radiotherapy, regular maintenance and attendance at our clinic. Twenty-eight had undergone primary TEP surgery and 10 had undergone secondary TEP surgery for voice restoration after laryngectomy for cancer. Thirty-five patients had primary closure of the pharynx with 13 vertical, 19 horizontal and 3 T-shaped closures. The other 3 patients required reconstructive surgery. Thirty-five patients had radiotherapy. A numerical assessment of voice production was made of patients immediately and at 6 months post-insertion. A review of the complications was also done.

RESULTS

TEPs provided a fair to good voice in 74% of our laryngectomees. Patients who attended the voice restoration clinics and who regularly cleaned their prostheses were found to have statistically better voices (P = 0.044 and P = 0.002, respectively). Patients less than 60 years old had better results, as did patients with horizontal or T-shaped closures; however, these were not statistically significant. Secondary TEPs provided fair/good voices in 90% of cases compared to 68% of primary TEPs. Voice quality during radiotherapy was diminished but recovered at 6 months postradiotherapy. The commonest complications noted included crusting (seen in 40% of cohort), candida infections and leaks which were seen in 16% of our patients. There was no mortality attributable to the use of TEPs in our study.

摘要

引言

人工喉语音恢复已广泛应用于喉切除患者的嗓音康复。本研究的目的是检查接受气管食管穿刺(TEP)和喉切除术后放置语音假体的患者的成功率、成功预测因素及并发症。据我们所知,这是新加坡首次对TEP的使用及并发症进行分析。

患者与方法

本回顾性病例分析纳入了在我们中心就诊的38例患者。分析的因素包括嗓音质量与年龄、植入时间、闭合类型、放疗使用情况、定期维护以及到我们诊所就诊情况。28例患者接受了初次TEP手术,10例患者在因癌症行喉切除术后接受了二次TEP手术以恢复嗓音。35例患者进行了咽的一期闭合,其中13例为垂直闭合,19例为水平闭合,3例为T形闭合。另外3例患者需要进行重建手术。35例患者接受了放疗。在患者植入后即刻及6个月时对其发声进行了数值评估。同时也对并发症进行了回顾。

结果

TEP使74%的喉切除患者获得了尚可至良好的嗓音。发现到嗓音恢复诊所就诊且定期清洁假体的患者在统计学上嗓音更好(分别为P = 0.044和P = 0.002)。年龄小于60岁的患者效果更好,水平或T形闭合的患者也是如此;然而,这些差异无统计学意义。二次TEP在90%的病例中提供了尚可/良好的嗓音,而初次TEP为68%。放疗期间嗓音质量下降,但放疗后6个月恢复。观察到的最常见并发症包括结痂(见于40%的队列)、念珠菌感染以及瘘漏,见于16%的患者。在我们的研究中,未出现因使用TEP导致的死亡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验