Parent M E, Hua Y, Siemiatycki J
INRS-Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Am J Ind Med. 2000 Dec;38(6):609-18. doi: 10.1002/1097-0274(200012)38:6<609::aid-ajim1>3.0.co;2-4.
Little is known about the role of workplace exposures on the risk of renal cell cancer.
A population-based case-control study was undertaken in Montreal to assess the association between hundreds of occupational circumstances and several cancer sites, including the kidney. A total of 142 male patients with pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma, 1900 controls with cancer at other sites and 533 population-based controls were interviewed. Detailed job histories and relevant data on potential confounders were obtained. A group of chemists-hygienists evaluated each job reported and translated them into a history of occupational exposures using a checklist of 294 substances. Multivariate logistic regression models using either population, cancer controls, or a pool of both groups were used to estimate odds ratios.
There were some indications of excess risks among printers, nursery workers (gardening), aircraft mechanics, farmers, and horticulturists, as well as in the following industries: printing-related services, defense services, wholesale trade, and retail trade. Notwithstanding the low precision of many of the odds ratio estimates, the following workplace exposures showed some evidence of excess risk: chromium compounds, chromium (VI) compounds, inorganic acid solutions, styrene-butadiene rubber, ozone, hydrogen sulphide, ultraviolet radiation, hair dust, felt dust, jet fuel engine emissions, jet fuel, aviation gasoline, phosphoric acid and inks.
For most of these associations there exist no, or very little, previous data. Some associations provide suggestive evidence for further studies.
关于工作场所暴露对肾细胞癌风险的作用,人们了解甚少。
在蒙特利尔开展了一项基于人群的病例对照研究,以评估数百种职业环境与包括肾脏在内的多个癌症部位之间的关联。共对142例经病理确诊的肾细胞癌男性患者、1900例其他部位癌症患者作为对照以及533例基于人群的对照进行了访谈。获取了详细的工作经历以及关于潜在混杂因素的相关数据。一组化学卫生学家对所报告的每份工作进行评估,并使用一份包含294种物质的清单将其转化为职业暴露史。使用基于人群、癌症对照或两组混合的多变量逻辑回归模型来估计比值比。
有迹象表明,印刷工人、苗圃工人(园艺)、飞机机械师、农民和园艺师以及以下行业存在额外风险:印刷相关服务、国防服务、批发贸易和零售贸易。尽管许多比值比估计的精度较低,但以下工作场所暴露显示出一些额外风险的证据:铬化合物、六价铬化合物、无机酸溶液、丁苯橡胶、臭氧、硫化氢、紫外线辐射、毛发粉尘、毛毡粉尘、喷气燃料发动机排放物、喷气燃料、航空汽油、磷酸和油墨。
对于这些关联中的大多数,以前没有或几乎没有相关数据。一些关联为进一步研究提供了提示性证据。