• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Learning to live with complexity: ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and health in Britain and the United States.学会与复杂性共处:英国和美国的种族、社会经济地位与健康
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1694-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1694.
2
Criollo, mestizo, mulato, LatiNegro, indígena, white, or black? The US Hispanic/Latino population and multiple responses in the 2000 census.克里奥尔人、混血儿、穆拉托人、拉丁裔黑人、印第安人、白人还是黑人?美国西班牙裔/拉丁裔人口与2000年人口普查中的多重回答。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1724-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1724.
3
Immigration, intermarriage, and the challenges of measuring racial/ethnic identities.移民、异族通婚以及衡量种族/族裔身份的挑战。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1735-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1735.
4
Conceptualizing and categorizing race and ethnicity in health services research.在卫生服务研究中对种族和族裔进行概念化和分类。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 2):1658-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00449.x.
5
Race/ethnicity and the 2000 census: implications for public health.种族/族裔与2000年人口普查:对公共卫生的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1709-13. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1709.
6
Race and ethnicity in public health surveillance: criteria for the scientific use of social categories.公共卫生监测中的种族与族裔:社会类别科学应用的标准
Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):7-15.
7
Census categories for mixed race and mixed ethnicity: impacts on data collection and analysis in the US, UK and NZ.混合种族和混合族裔的人口普查类别:对美国、英国和新西兰数据收集与分析的影响
Public Health. 2015 Mar;129(3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.12.017. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
8
Measuring our nation's diversity: developing a common language for data on race/ethnicity.衡量我们国家的多样性:为种族/族裔数据制定通用语言。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1704-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1704.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status: measurement and methodological issues.种族/民族与社会经济地位:测量与方法学问题
Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(3):483-505. doi: 10.2190/U9QT-7B7Y-HQ15-JT14.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Inequalities in Long-Term Health Effects After COVID-19-A Scoping Review.《COVID-19 后长期健康影响的社会不平等:范围综述》。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;69:1606739. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606739. eCollection 2024.
2
Cohort profile update: the Norwegian STORK Groruddalen (STORK G) pregnancy and birth cohort-the role of ethnicity and causal pathways for obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other health issues.队列资料更新:挪威 STORK Groruddalen(STORK G)妊娠和分娩队列 - 种族的作用以及肥胖、2 型糖尿病、心血管疾病和其他健康问题的因果途径。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 29;13(10):e076251. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076251.
3
The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.患者的收入和教育水平与其获得慢性疼痛药物治疗的关系:一项范围综述。
Can J Pain. 2022 Sep 1;6(1):142-170. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2104699. eCollection 2022.
4
Immigrant ancestry and birthweight across two generations born in Sweden: an intergenerational cohort study.两代在瑞典出生的移民血统和出生体重:一项世代间队列研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Apr;7(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007341.
5
Inequality in the Face of Death: The Income Gradient in Mortality of the Spanish Pre-Recession Working-Age Population.不平等的死亡面前:西班牙衰退前工作年龄段人口死亡率的收入梯度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 25;18(23):12379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312379.
6
COVID-19 mortality across occupations and secondary risks for elderly individuals in the household: A population register-based study.职业与老年人家庭中二级风险对 COVID-19 死亡率的影响:一项基于人群登记的研究。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Jan 1;48(1):52-60. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3992. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
A case-control and cohort study to determine the relationship between ethnic background and severe COVID-19.一项病例对照和队列研究,以确定种族背景与重症 COVID-19 之间的关系。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov;28:100574. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100574. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
8
Cultural Influences on Complementary Feeding Beliefs amongst New Chinese Immigrant Mothers in England: A Mixed Methods Study.文化对英国新移民母亲在补充喂养信念上的影响:混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 29;17(15):5468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155468.
9
Stability of the vaginal, oral, and gut microbiota across pregnancy among African American women: the effect of socioeconomic status and antibiotic exposure.非裔美国女性孕期阴道、口腔和肠道微生物群的稳定性:社会经济地位和抗生素暴露的影响。
PeerJ. 2019 Nov 21;7:e8004. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8004. eCollection 2019.
10
Patient perspectives on routinely being asked about their race and ethnicity: Qualitative study in primary care.患者对常规询问其种族和民族的看法:初级保健中的定性研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Aug;65(8):e363-e369.

本文引用的文献

1
Public Health Weekly Reports for SEPTEMBER 21, 1934.1934年9月21日公共卫生周报
Public Health Rep (1896). 1934 Sep 21;49(38):1101-1127.
2
DEATHS AMONG TAXPAYERS AND NON-TAXPAYERS INCOME TAX, PROVIDENCE, 1865.1865年普罗维登斯市纳税人与非纳税人所得税纳税者中的死亡情况
Am J Public Health (N Y). 1924 Aug;14(8):647-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.14.8.647-a.
3
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MORTALITY RATES OF THE COLORED POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES.美国有色人种死亡率的意义
Am J Public Health (N Y). 1916 Mar;6(3):254-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.6.3.254.
4
The ethnic density effect: results from a national community survey of England and Wales.种族密度效应:来自英格兰和威尔士全国社区调查的结果。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2000 Spring;46(1):34-46. doi: 10.1177/002076400004600105.
5
Re: "Seeking causal explanations in social epidemiology".
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr 15;151(8):831-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010283.
6
Income inequality and mortality: importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions.收入不平等与死亡率:个人收入、社会心理环境或物质条件对健康的重要性。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 29;320(7243):1200-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1200.
7
Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988-92 (United States).1988 - 1992年美国旧金山湾区亚裔、黑人、西班牙裔和白人居民的社会阶层、种族/族裔以及乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌的发病率
Cancer Causes Control. 1999 Dec;10(6):525-37. doi: 10.1023/a:1008950210967.
8
Ecological analysis of ethnic differences in relation between tuberculosis and poverty.结核病与贫困关系中种族差异的生态分析。
BMJ. 1999 Oct 16;319(7216):1031-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7216.1031.
9
The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the "salmon bias" and healthy migrant hypotheses.拉丁裔死亡率悖论:对“鲑鱼偏差”和健康移民假说的检验。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Oct;89(10):1543-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.10.1543.
10
Heterogeneity of coronary heart disease risk factors in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and European origin populations: cross sectional study.印度、巴基斯坦、孟加拉国和欧洲裔人群冠心病危险因素的异质性:横断面研究。
BMJ. 1999 Jul 24;319(7204):215-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7204.215.

学会与复杂性共处:英国和美国的种族、社会经济地位与健康

Learning to live with complexity: ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and health in Britain and the United States.

作者信息

Smith G D

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, England.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1694-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1694.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.90.11.1694
PMID:11076232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1446401/
Abstract

The relation between ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and health is complex, has changed over time, and differs between countries. In the United States there is a long tradition of treating ethnic group membership simply as a socioeconomic measure, and differentials in health status between African Americans and groups of European origin have been considered purely socioeconomic. A contrary position sees the differences as either "cultural" or due to inherent "racial" differences. Although conventional socioeconomic indicators statistically explain much of the health difference between African Americans and Americans of European origin, they do not tell the full story. Incommensurate measures of socioeconomic position across ethnic groups clearly contribute to this difference. Additional factors, such as the extent of racism, are also likely to be important. The interaction of ethnicity, social position, and health in Britain is similarly complex. Studies that inadequately account for socioeconomic circumstances when examining ethnic-group differences in health can reify ethnicity (and its supposed correlates); however, the reductionist attribution of all ethnic differences in health to socioeconomic factors is untenable. The only productive way forward is through studies that recognize the contingency of the relations between socioeconomic position, ethnicity, and particular health outcomes.

摘要

种族、社会经济地位与健康之间的关系错综复杂,随时间变化,且因国家而异。在美国,长期以来一直将种族群体成员身份简单地视为一种社会经济衡量标准,非裔美国人和欧洲裔群体之间的健康状况差异一直被认为纯粹是社会经济方面的。相反的观点则认为这些差异要么是“文化”造成的,要么是由于固有的“种族”差异。尽管传统的社会经济指标从统计学角度解释了非裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人之间健康差异的很大一部分,但它们并不能说明全部情况。不同种族群体之间社会经济地位衡量标准的不一致显然导致了这种差异。其他因素,如种族主义的程度,也可能很重要。在英国,种族、社会地位与健康之间的相互作用同样复杂。在研究不同种族群体的健康差异时,如果没有充分考虑社会经济情况,可能会使种族(及其假定的相关因素)固化;然而,将所有健康方面的种族差异都归因于社会经济因素的还原论观点是站不住脚的。唯一有效的前进道路是通过研究认识到社会经济地位、种族和特定健康结果之间关系的偶然性。