Suppr超能文献

学会与复杂性共处:英国和美国的种族、社会经济地位与健康

Learning to live with complexity: ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and health in Britain and the United States.

作者信息

Smith G D

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, England.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1694-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1694.

Abstract

The relation between ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and health is complex, has changed over time, and differs between countries. In the United States there is a long tradition of treating ethnic group membership simply as a socioeconomic measure, and differentials in health status between African Americans and groups of European origin have been considered purely socioeconomic. A contrary position sees the differences as either "cultural" or due to inherent "racial" differences. Although conventional socioeconomic indicators statistically explain much of the health difference between African Americans and Americans of European origin, they do not tell the full story. Incommensurate measures of socioeconomic position across ethnic groups clearly contribute to this difference. Additional factors, such as the extent of racism, are also likely to be important. The interaction of ethnicity, social position, and health in Britain is similarly complex. Studies that inadequately account for socioeconomic circumstances when examining ethnic-group differences in health can reify ethnicity (and its supposed correlates); however, the reductionist attribution of all ethnic differences in health to socioeconomic factors is untenable. The only productive way forward is through studies that recognize the contingency of the relations between socioeconomic position, ethnicity, and particular health outcomes.

摘要

种族、社会经济地位与健康之间的关系错综复杂,随时间变化,且因国家而异。在美国,长期以来一直将种族群体成员身份简单地视为一种社会经济衡量标准,非裔美国人和欧洲裔群体之间的健康状况差异一直被认为纯粹是社会经济方面的。相反的观点则认为这些差异要么是“文化”造成的,要么是由于固有的“种族”差异。尽管传统的社会经济指标从统计学角度解释了非裔美国人和欧洲裔美国人之间健康差异的很大一部分,但它们并不能说明全部情况。不同种族群体之间社会经济地位衡量标准的不一致显然导致了这种差异。其他因素,如种族主义的程度,也可能很重要。在英国,种族、社会地位与健康之间的相互作用同样复杂。在研究不同种族群体的健康差异时,如果没有充分考虑社会经济情况,可能会使种族(及其假定的相关因素)固化;然而,将所有健康方面的种族差异都归因于社会经济因素的还原论观点是站不住脚的。唯一有效的前进道路是通过研究认识到社会经济地位、种族和特定健康结果之间关系的偶然性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Re: "Seeking causal explanations in social epidemiology".
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Apr 15;151(8):831-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010283.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验