• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会人口学特征在多大程度上能够解释儿童安全措施的差异?

How well do socio-demographic characteristics explain variation in childhood safety practices?

作者信息

Hapgood R, Kendrick D, Marsh P

机构信息

Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 2000 Sep;22(3):307-11. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.3.307.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/22.3.307
PMID:11077902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unintentional injury is the leading cause of death in children older than 1 year. Deaths from accidents have a steeper class gradient than any other fatal condition and this inequality is widening. There are few published data on the relationship between safety practices and sociodemographic characteristics, hence this study has been undertaken to examine this relationship.

METHODS

The study population comprised all parents and guardians of children aged 3-12 months in 36 practices throughout Nottingham (n = 2,152). A postal questionnaire was used to survey current childcare safety practices (from which safe practices scores were derived), together with socio-demographic variables and known risk factors for childhood unintentional injury.

RESULTS

Unsafe childcare practices were common. Socioeconomically disadvantaged families had more unsafe practices than more affluent families, but few parents undertook safe practices all the time. The child's age (p<0.01), ethnicity (p<0.01) and living in non-owner-occupied accommodation (p<0.01) were independently associated with the safe practices score. Multivariate regression modelling showed that these risk factors explained only 11 per cent of the variation in the safety practices score. Socio-economic factors explained more of the variation in possession and use of items of safety equipment (13 per cent) than the variation in safety behaviours with no cost implications (3 per cent).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the variation in the number of safety practices is not explained by socio-demographic characteristics and further work is required to examine other possible determinants of safe practice.

摘要

背景

意外伤害是1岁以上儿童死亡的主要原因。事故死亡的阶层梯度比任何其他致命疾病都要陡峭,而且这种不平等正在加剧。关于安全措施与社会人口统计学特征之间关系的已发表数据很少,因此开展了本研究来考察这种关系。

方法

研究人群包括诺丁汉36家医疗机构中所有3至12个月大儿童的父母和监护人(n = 2152)。通过邮寄问卷来调查当前的儿童保育安全措施(从中得出安全措施得分),以及社会人口统计学变量和儿童意外伤害的已知风险因素。

结果

不安全的儿童保育措施很常见。社会经济条件较差的家庭比富裕家庭有更多不安全措施,但很少有父母始终采取安全措施。孩子的年龄(p<0.01)、种族(p<0.01)以及居住在非自有住房中(p<0.01)与安全措施得分独立相关。多变量回归模型显示,这些风险因素仅解释了安全措施得分变异的11%。社会经济因素对安全设备的拥有和使用变异(13%)的解释比对无成本影响的安全行为变异(3%)的解释更多。

结论

安全措施数量的大部分变异无法用社会人口统计学特征来解释,需要进一步开展工作来考察安全措施其他可能的决定因素。

相似文献

1
How well do socio-demographic characteristics explain variation in childhood safety practices?社会人口学特征在多大程度上能够解释儿童安全措施的差异?
J Public Health Med. 2000 Sep;22(3):307-11. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.3.307.
2
Do self reported safety behaviours predict childhood unintentional injuries?自我报告的安全行为能预测儿童意外伤害吗?
Inj Prev. 2001 Mar;7(1):14-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.1.14.
3
Accidental injury: risk and preventative interventions.意外伤害:风险与预防干预措施
Arch Dis Child. 1997 Jul;77(1):28-31. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.1.28.
4
How useful are sociodemographic characteristics in identifying children at risk of unintentional injury?社会人口学特征在识别有意外伤害风险的儿童方面有多大用处?
Public Health. 2001 Mar;115(2):103-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900737.
5
A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years.一项针对有5岁以下儿童家庭的全科医生安全建议的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 1998 May 23;316(7144):1576-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7144.1576.
6
Babywalkers: prevalence of use and relationship with other safety practices.婴儿学步车:使用情况及其与其他安全措施的关系。
Inj Prev. 1998 Dec;4(4):295-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.4.4.295.
7
Risk for household safety hazards: Socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors.家庭安全隐患风险:社会经济和社会人口因素。
J Safety Res. 2014 Dec;51:87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
8
Engagement in safety practices to prevent home injuries in preschool children among white and non-white ethnic minority families.白人和非白人少数民族家庭中为预防学龄前儿童家庭伤害而采取的安全措施。
Inj Prev. 2004 Dec;10(6):375-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.005397.
9
Child injury: Does home matter?儿童伤害:家庭环境有影响吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;153:250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
10
Do maternal depressive symptoms, stress and a lack of social support influence whether mothers living in deprived circumstances adopt safety practices for the prevention of childhood injury?母亲的抑郁症状、压力和社会支持的缺乏是否会影响生活在贫困环境中的母亲采取预防儿童伤害的安全措施?
Child Care Health Dev. 2006 May;32(3):311-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00590.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Unsafe storage of household medicines: results from a cross-sectional study of four-year-olds from the 2004 Pelotas birth cohort (Brazil).家庭药品的不安全储存:来自2004年佩洛塔斯出生队列(巴西)四岁儿童横断面研究的结果
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Jul 12;19(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1597-1.
2
Unintentional Injury, Supervision, and Discourses on Childproofing Devices.意外伤害、监管与儿童防护装置的话语
Med Anthropol. 2019 Jan;38(1):15-29. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2018.1482548. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
3
The influence of parental education and other socio-economic factors on child car seat use.
父母教育程度及其他社会经济因素对儿童汽车安全座椅使用情况的影响。
Zdr Varst. 2016 Nov 6;56(1):55-64. doi: 10.1515/sjph-2017-0008. eCollection 2017 Mar 1.
4
Regional variations in pediatric medication exposure: Spatial analysis of poison center utilization in western Pennsylvania.儿科用药暴露的区域差异:宾夕法尼亚西部中毒控制中心利用情况的空间分析。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016;54(1):47-52. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1113543. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
Examining fire department injury data as a tool for epidemiological investigation.将消防部门的伤害数据作为流行病学调查工具进行研究。
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):310-4. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000075.
6
Fire and scald burn risks in urban communities: who is at risk and what do they believe about home safety?城市社区的火灾和烫伤风险:哪些人面临风险,以及他们对家庭安全的看法是什么?
Health Educ Res. 2013 Aug;28(4):599-611. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt046. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
7
Unintentional injury in early childhood: its relationship with childcare setting and provider.儿童早期意外伤害:与儿童保育环境和提供者的关系。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Nov;17(9):1541-9. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1110-z.
8
Inequalities in hospital admission rates for unintentional poisoning in young children.幼儿非故意伤害中毒住院率的不平等现象。
Inj Prev. 2006 Jun;12(3):166-70. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011254.
9
Engagement in safety practices to prevent home injuries in preschool children among white and non-white ethnic minority families.白人和非白人少数民族家庭中为预防学龄前儿童家庭伤害而采取的安全措施。
Inj Prev. 2004 Dec;10(6):375-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.005397.
10
Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four French cities: a controlled randomized trial.法国四个城市儿童伤害预防套件的家庭配送:一项对照随机试验。
Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):261-5; discussion 265. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.261.