Sznajder M, Leduc S, Janvrin M P, Bonnin M H, Aegerter P, Baudier F, Chevallier B
Department of Pediatrics, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne, France.
Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):261-5; discussion 265. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.261.
Home delivery of counselling and safety devices to prevent child injuries could help parents to adopt safe behaviour. The aim of this study was to test a safety kit designed and used in Quebec (Canada).
One hundred families from four towns in the Paris suburbs were visited at home by nurses or doctors when their child reached 6-9 months. Selection criteria were: primipara, medical problem, psychological, and/or socioeconomic difficulties.
During the first visit, 50 families (group 1) received counselling and a kit including preventive devices and pamphlets about indoor injuries and ways to avoid them. The other 50 families (group 2) received counselling but not the kit. A second home visit was made 6-8 weeks later.
The number of safety improvements was calculated 6-8 weeks after a first home visit. Perceived usefulness of the kit was collected from families and from interviewers.
Between the first and the second visits, safety improvement was significantly higher in the group with the kit. This was mainly related to the risk of fall (p<0.02), fire and burns (p<0.001), poisoning (p<0.01), and suffocation (p<0.001). For improvement related to devices provided in the kit, the difference between the groups was significant: 64.4% improvement in group 1 versus 41.2% in group 2 (p<0.01). The relative risk (RR) of safety improvement between groups was 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35 to 1.80). Even for improvements not related to the kit the difference remained significant: 31.2% in group 1 versus 20.2% in group 2 (p<0.05); RR = 1.54 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.93).
Routine home visits by social services offer a good opportunity to tackle child injury prevention. Free delivery of prevention kits and counselling allow families to modify their behaviour and homes so as to reduce risks.
上门提供咨询服务及安全设备以预防儿童受伤,这有助于家长采取安全行为。本研究旨在测试一款在加拿大魁北克设计并使用的安全包。
当孩子6至9个月大时,护士或医生对巴黎郊区四个城镇的100个家庭进行了家访。入选标准为:初产妇、有医疗问题、心理和/或社会经济困难。
在首次家访期间,50个家庭(第1组)接受了咨询服务,并收到一个包含预防设备以及有关室内伤害及其避免方法的宣传册的安全包。另外50个家庭(第2组)接受了咨询服务,但未收到安全包。6至8周后进行了第二次家访。
首次家访6至8周后计算安全改善的数量。从家庭和访视人员处收集对安全包的感知有用性。
在首次和第二次家访之间,收到安全包的组安全改善情况明显更好。这主要与跌倒风险(p<0.02)、火灾和烧伤风险(p<0.001)、中毒风险(p<0.01)以及窒息风险(p<0.001)有关。对于与安全包中提供的设备相关的改善,两组之间的差异显著:第1组改善了64.4%,而第2组为41.2%(p<0.01)。两组之间安全改善的相对风险(RR)为1.56(95%置信区间(CI)为1.35至1.80)。即使对于与安全包无关的改善,差异仍然显著:第1组为31.2%,第2组为20.2%(p<0.05);RR = 1.54(95%CI为1.22至1.93)。
社会服务部门进行的常规家访为预防儿童受伤提供了一个很好的契机。免费提供预防包和咨询服务能让家庭改变其行为和家庭环境,从而降低风险。