• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four French cities: a controlled randomized trial.法国四个城市儿童伤害预防套件的家庭配送:一项对照随机试验。
Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):261-5; discussion 265. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.261.
2
[Evaluation of the effectiveness of an injury prevention kit delivery for toddlers in four French cities].
Arch Pediatr. 2003 Jun;10(6):510-6. doi: 10.1016/s0929-693x(03)00145-3.
3
The effectiveness of a home visit to prevent childhood injury.家访预防儿童伤害的有效性。
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):382-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.382.
4
Parenting interventions for the prevention of unintentional injuries in childhood.预防儿童意外伤害的育儿干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD006020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006020.pub2.
5
Injury prevention counselling to improve safety practices by parents in Mexico.在墨西哥开展伤害预防咨询,以改善家长的安全行为。
Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(8):591-8. Epub 2003 Oct 14.
6
Long term effects of a home visit to prevent childhood injury: three year follow up of a randomized trial.家访预防儿童伤害的长期效果:一项随机试验的三年随访
Inj Prev. 2005 Apr;11(2):106-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.006791.
7
A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 years.一项针对有5岁以下儿童家庭的全科医生安全建议的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 1998 May 23;316(7144):1576-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7144.1576.
8
Paraprofessional home visitation program to prevent childhood unintentional injuries in low-income communities: a cluster randomized controlled trial.预防低收入社区儿童意外伤害的非专业家庭访视项目:一项整群随机对照试验
Inj Prev. 2008 Jun;14(3):164-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.016832.
9
A randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of an infant home safety programme.一项评估婴儿家庭安全计划有效性的随机试验。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2007 Jun;14(2):109-17. doi: 10.1080/17457300701272474.
10
A randomized trial of a home safety education intervention using a safe home model.一项采用安全家居模式进行家庭安全教育干预的随机试验。
J Trauma. 2010 Oct;69(4 Suppl):S233-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f1ec2e.

引用本文的文献

1
Voices from the Ground: Community Perspectives on Preventing Unintentional Child Injuries in Low-Income Settings.来自基层的声音:在低收入环境下预防儿童意外伤害的社区观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;21(3):272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030272.
2
Educational technologies for accident prevention due to falls in childhood: a scoping review.预防儿童跌倒事故的教育技术:范围综述。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Dec 8;76Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20220807. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0807. eCollection 2023.
3
Interventions for Preventing Residential Fires in Vulnerable Neighbourhoods and Indigenous Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature.干预措施预防脆弱社区和土著社区的住宅火灾:文献系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;19(9):5434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095434.
4
Cultural adaptation for country diversity: A systematic review of injury prevention interventions caused by domestic accidents in children under five years old.针对国家多样性的文化适应:对五岁以下儿童家庭事故所致伤害预防干预措施的系统评价
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Nov 20;33:124. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.124. eCollection 2019.
5
Evaluating the Impact of Personalized Stroke Management Tool Kits on Patient Experience and Stroke Recovery.评估个性化卒中管理工具包对患者体验和卒中康复的影响。
J Patient Exp. 2018 Dec;5(4):244-249. doi: 10.1177/2374373517750416. Epub 2018 Jan 7.
6
Preventing childhood scalds within the home: Overview of systematic reviews and a systematic review of primary studies.预防家庭内儿童烫伤:系统评价概述及原始研究的系统评价
Burns. 2015 Aug;41(5):907-24. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
7
Home injury risks to young children in Karachi, Pakistan: a pilot study.巴基斯坦卡拉奇市幼儿家庭伤害风险:一项试点研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Nov;98(11):881-6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-303907. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
8
Disseminating childhood home injury risk reduction information in Pakistan: results from a community-based pilot study.在巴基斯坦传播儿童家庭伤害预防信息:基于社区的试点研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Mar 15;10(3):1113-24. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10031113.
9
Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention.居家安全教育及提供预防伤害的安全设备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD005014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005014.pub3.
10
Modification of the home environment for the reduction of injuries.改善家庭环境以减少伤害。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;2011(2):CD003600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003600.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Social deprivation and the prevention of unintentional injury in childhood: a systematic review.社会剥夺与儿童意外伤害的预防:一项系统综述
Health Educ Res. 2002 Apr;17(2):221-37. doi: 10.1093/her/17.2.221.
2
The effectiveness of a home visit to prevent childhood injury.家访预防儿童伤害的有效性。
Pediatrics. 2001 Aug;108(2):382-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.382.
3
[Facial burns in children. 197 patients].[儿童面部烧伤。197例患者]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2001 Jun;46(3):190-5. doi: 10.1016/s0294-1260(01)00020-6.
4
[Frequency of childhood injuries: first results of the Boulogne-Billancourt registry].[儿童伤害发生率:布洛涅-比扬古登记处的初步结果]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2001 Apr;49(2):125-34.
5
How well do socio-demographic characteristics explain variation in childhood safety practices?社会人口学特征在多大程度上能够解释儿童安全措施的差异?
J Public Health Med. 2000 Sep;22(3):307-11. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.3.307.
6
Evaluating injury prevention programs: the Oklahoma City Smoke Alarm Project.评估伤害预防项目:俄克拉荷马城烟雾报警器项目。
Future Child. 2000 Spring-Summer;10(1):164-74.
7
Community-based injury prevention interventions.基于社区的伤害预防干预措施。
Future Child. 2000 Spring-Summer;10(1):83-110.
8
Individual-level injury prevention strategies in the clinical setting.临床环境中的个体层面伤害预防策略。
Future Child. 2000 Spring-Summer;10(1):53-82.
9
Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: eighty-four recent estimates for the United States.伤害预防与控制中的成本效益分析:美国近期的84项评估
Med Care. 2000 Jun;38(6):562-82. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00003.
10
The "Let's Get Alarmed!" initiative: a smoke alarm giveaway programme.“让我们提高警惕!”倡议:一项烟雾报警器赠送计划。
Inj Prev. 1999 Sep;5(3):177-82. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.3.177.

法国四个城市儿童伤害预防套件的家庭配送:一项对照随机试验。

Home delivery of an injury prevention kit for children in four French cities: a controlled randomized trial.

作者信息

Sznajder M, Leduc S, Janvrin M P, Bonnin M H, Aegerter P, Baudier F, Chevallier B

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne, France.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;9(3):261-5; discussion 265. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.261.

DOI:10.1136/ip.9.3.261
PMID:12966017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1730977/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Home delivery of counselling and safety devices to prevent child injuries could help parents to adopt safe behaviour. The aim of this study was to test a safety kit designed and used in Quebec (Canada).

DESIGN AND SUBJECTS

One hundred families from four towns in the Paris suburbs were visited at home by nurses or doctors when their child reached 6-9 months. Selection criteria were: primipara, medical problem, psychological, and/or socioeconomic difficulties.

INTERVENTIONS

During the first visit, 50 families (group 1) received counselling and a kit including preventive devices and pamphlets about indoor injuries and ways to avoid them. The other 50 families (group 2) received counselling but not the kit. A second home visit was made 6-8 weeks later.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of safety improvements was calculated 6-8 weeks after a first home visit. Perceived usefulness of the kit was collected from families and from interviewers.

RESULTS

Between the first and the second visits, safety improvement was significantly higher in the group with the kit. This was mainly related to the risk of fall (p<0.02), fire and burns (p<0.001), poisoning (p<0.01), and suffocation (p<0.001). For improvement related to devices provided in the kit, the difference between the groups was significant: 64.4% improvement in group 1 versus 41.2% in group 2 (p<0.01). The relative risk (RR) of safety improvement between groups was 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35 to 1.80). Even for improvements not related to the kit the difference remained significant: 31.2% in group 1 versus 20.2% in group 2 (p<0.05); RR = 1.54 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.93).

CONCLUSION

Routine home visits by social services offer a good opportunity to tackle child injury prevention. Free delivery of prevention kits and counselling allow families to modify their behaviour and homes so as to reduce risks.

摘要

目的

上门提供咨询服务及安全设备以预防儿童受伤,这有助于家长采取安全行为。本研究旨在测试一款在加拿大魁北克设计并使用的安全包。

设计与研究对象

当孩子6至9个月大时,护士或医生对巴黎郊区四个城镇的100个家庭进行了家访。入选标准为:初产妇、有医疗问题、心理和/或社会经济困难。

干预措施

在首次家访期间,50个家庭(第1组)接受了咨询服务,并收到一个包含预防设备以及有关室内伤害及其避免方法的宣传册的安全包。另外50个家庭(第2组)接受了咨询服务,但未收到安全包。6至8周后进行了第二次家访。

主要观察指标

首次家访6至8周后计算安全改善的数量。从家庭和访视人员处收集对安全包的感知有用性。

结果

在首次和第二次家访之间,收到安全包的组安全改善情况明显更好。这主要与跌倒风险(p<0.02)、火灾和烧伤风险(p<0.001)、中毒风险(p<0.01)以及窒息风险(p<0.001)有关。对于与安全包中提供的设备相关的改善,两组之间的差异显著:第1组改善了64.4%,而第2组为41.2%(p<0.01)。两组之间安全改善的相对风险(RR)为1.56(95%置信区间(CI)为1.35至1.80)。即使对于与安全包无关的改善,差异仍然显著:第1组为31.2%,第2组为20.2%(p<0.05);RR = 1.54(95%CI为1.22至1.93)。

结论

社会服务部门进行的常规家访为预防儿童受伤提供了一个很好的契机。免费提供预防包和咨询服务能让家庭改变其行为和家庭环境,从而降低风险。