Reinschmidt C, Nigg B M
Human Performance Laboratory, University of Calgary, Canada.
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2000 Sep;14(3):71-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-7866.
This review paper focuses on the three most important functional design factors for sport shoes: injury prevention, performance and comfort. Concepts for these design factors are discussed for running and court shoes. For running shoes, pronation control and cushioning are still considered to be the key concepts for injury prevention despite the fact that conclusive clinical and epidemiological evidence is missing to show the efficacy of these design strategies. Several design features have been proposed to be effective in controlling the amount of pronation. However, the kinematic effects of such features seem to be subject-specific and rather small especially when looking at the actual skeletal motion. Recent running shoe research suggests that cushioning may not or only marginally be related to injuries and that cushioning during the impact phase of running may be more related to aspects such as comfort, muscle tuning or fatigue. For court shoes, lateral stability, torsional flexibility, cushioning and traction control appear to be important design strategies to decrease the risk of injury. With respect to running performance, the shoe concepts of weight reduction, efficiency and energy return are discussed. The concept of energy return does not seem to be a feasible concept whereas concepts which aim to minimize energy loss appear to be more promising and successful, e.g. weight reduction, reduction of muscle energy required for stabilization. For court shoes, optimal traction seems to be the key factor for performance. Research in the area of shoe comfort is still sparse. Cushioning, fitting and climate concepts appear to improve the comfort of both running and court shoes. Many investigations in the area of sport shoe research have shown that subject-specific responses can be expected. Different groups of athletes may require different types of shoes. The definition of these grouping characteristics and their design needs seem to be the most important challenge for the sport shoe researchers and manufacturers for the near future.
预防损伤、性能和舒适度。针对跑鞋和场地运动鞋,讨论了这些设计因素的相关概念。对于跑鞋而言,尽管缺乏确凿的临床和流行病学证据来证明这些设计策略的有效性,但内旋控制和缓冲仍被视为预防损伤的关键概念。已经提出了几种设计特征,认为它们能有效控制内旋量。然而,这些特征的运动学效应似乎因个体而异,而且相当小,尤其是考虑到实际的骨骼运动时。最近的跑鞋研究表明,缓冲可能与损伤无关或仅有微弱关联,并且跑步冲击阶段的缓冲可能更多地与舒适度、肌肉调节或疲劳等方面相关。对于场地运动鞋,侧向稳定性、扭转灵活性、缓冲和牵引力控制似乎是降低损伤风险的重要设计策略。关于跑步性能,讨论了减轻重量、效率和能量回馈等鞋类概念。能量回馈概念似乎并不可行,而旨在最小化能量损失的概念似乎更有前景且更为成功,例如减轻重量、减少稳定所需的肌肉能量。对于场地运动鞋,最佳牵引力似乎是性能的关键因素。鞋类舒适度领域的研究仍然较少。缓冲、贴合度和气候相关概念似乎能提高跑鞋和场地运动鞋的舒适度。运动鞋研究领域的许多调查表明,个体特异性反应是可以预期的。不同群体的运动员可能需要不同类型的鞋子。对于运动鞋研究人员和制造商来说,在不久的将来,定义这些分组特征及其设计需求似乎是最重要的挑战。