Suppr超能文献

高血压的治疗研究与动脉僵硬度:欧洲高血压学会建议。动脉结构与功能临床委员会。欧洲高血压学会血管结构与功能工作组。

Therapeutic studies and arterial stiffness in hypertension: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. The Clinical Committee of Arterial Structure and Function. Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function of the European Society of Hypertension.

作者信息

Safar M E, London G M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Broussais, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2000 Nov;18(11):1527-35. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018110-00001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increased pulse pressure and arterial stiffness are identified as predictors of cardiovascular risk in older hypertensive populations, particularly that of myocardial infarction. Because increased pulse pressure involves an increase in systolic (SBP) and a decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and because the former promotes cardiac hypertrophy and the latter alters coronary perfusion, a drug regimen reducing pulse pressure and decreasing arterial stiffness might further reduce cardiovascular risk. Under conventional treatment, normalization of DBP (< or = 90 mmHg) is not consistently associated with normalization of SBP (< or = 140 mmHg).

THERAPEUTIC DESIGNS

In individuals older than 50 years, the goal of antihypertensive treatment should be, not only to decrease mean blood pressure (to less than 100 mmHg), but also to decrease pulse pressure (to less than 50 mmHg). Using appropriate pharmacological tools, trials should test whether an active decrease in arterial stiffness might produce an attenuation of the age-related increase in SBP and decrease in DBP, thus delaying the age-related increase in pulse pressure and decreasing further cardiovascular risk. This procedure requires concomitant non-invasive evaluations of aortic stiffness.

CONCLUSION

The studies that are required in hypertension should use two different approaches: novel titrations of conventional drugs to achieve a decrease in either SBP or pulse pressure, and development of new drugs acting selectively on the large artery wall, to facilitate the conduct of subsequent controlled trials.

摘要

背景

脉压升高和动脉僵硬度增加被认为是老年高血压人群心血管风险的预测因素,尤其是心肌梗死风险。由于脉压升高涉及收缩压(SBP)升高和舒张压(DBP)降低,且前者促进心脏肥大,后者改变冠状动脉灌注,因此一种能降低脉压和减轻动脉僵硬度的药物治疗方案可能会进一步降低心血管风险。在传统治疗下,DBP正常化(≤90 mmHg)与SBP正常化(≤140 mmHg)并不总是相关。

治疗设计

对于50岁以上的个体,降压治疗的目标不仅应是降低平均血压(至低于100 mmHg),还应是降低脉压(至低于50 mmHg)。利用适当的药理学手段,试验应测试主动减轻动脉僵硬度是否可能减弱与年龄相关的SBP升高和DBP降低,从而延缓与年龄相关的脉压升高并进一步降低心血管风险。该过程需要同时对主动脉僵硬度进行非侵入性评估。

结论

高血压研究应采用两种不同方法:对传统药物进行新的滴定以降低SBP或脉压,以及开发选择性作用于大动脉壁的新药,以便于开展后续对照试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验