Horn F K, Bergua A, Jünemann A, Korth M
Department of Ophthalmology and University Eye Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg at Erlangen, Germany.
J Glaucoma. 2000 Dec;9(6):428-37. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200012000-00003.
To evaluate the diagnostic value of visual evoked potential (VEP) assessment with luminance-contrast and color-contrast stimulation in the detection of glaucoma.
The study included 59 patients (96 eyes) with glaucomatous changes of the optic disc and visual field defects and 58 control eyes of 29 healthy patients. Four types of pattern VEP stimulation (0.9 cycle/degree) were performed in all patients: achromatic, alternating sine-wave stripe pattern: 6 reversals per second, contrast of 10% (activation of predominantly the magnocellular pathway); isoluminant, red-green stripe pattern: 83.3 milliseconds onset, 83.3 milliseconds offset, contrast of 30% and 80% (activation of predominantly the parvocellular pathway); and blue grating with yellow background adaptation: 200 milliseconds onset, 500 milliseconds offset (activation of the blue-sensitive pathway).
The glaucoma group and the control group differed significantly (P < 0.01) in the peak times of all chromatic VEP responses and to a lesser degree in the achromatic VEP. Considering the amplitudes, only the low-contrast red-green stimulus showed a statistically significant reduction in glaucoma. At a predefined specificity of 90%, in separating patients with glaucoma from healthy control subjects, the peak time of the blue-yellow VEP had a high sensitivity (90%), whereas the sensitivity of the achromatic VEP was low (31%). The red-green VEP showed a sensitivity of 73% using low contrast and 71% using high contrast. In a paired correlation analysis with visual field defects, all stimulations showed significant (P < 0.05) results. Correlation coefficients were highest (R = 0.79, P < 0.01) for the peak time of the blue-yellow VEP.
VEP measurements with presumable stimulation of single neuronal pathways can detect glaucomatous optic nerve damage in a considerable fraction of patients with visual field loss. Occipital responses to chromatic stimulation seem to be more sensitive to glaucoma damages than do responses to achromatic pattern reversal stimulation.
评估亮度对比和颜色对比刺激下视觉诱发电位(VEP)评估在青光眼检测中的诊断价值。
本研究纳入了59例(96只眼)存在视盘青光眼性改变和视野缺损的患者以及29例健康患者的58只对照眼。对所有患者进行了四种类型的图形VEP刺激(0.9周期/度):消色差、交替正弦波条纹图形:每秒6次反转,对比度为10%(主要激活大细胞通路);等亮度、红-绿条纹图形:起始83.3毫秒,结束83.3毫秒,对比度为30%和80%(主要激活小细胞通路);以及黄色背景适应下的蓝色光栅:起始200毫秒,结束500毫秒(激活蓝敏通路)。
青光眼组和对照组在所有彩色VEP反应的峰值时间上差异显著(P < 0.01),在消色差VEP方面差异较小。考虑振幅时,只有低对比度红-绿刺激在青光眼中显示出统计学上的显著降低。在预定义特异性为90%时,在区分青光眼患者与健康对照者时,蓝-黄VEP的峰值时间具有高敏感性(90%),而消色差VEP的敏感性较低(31%)。低对比度时红-绿VEP的敏感性为73%,高对比度时为71%。在与视野缺损的配对相关性分析中,所有刺激均显示出显著(P < 0.05)结果。蓝-黄VEP峰值时间与视野缺损的相关系数最高(R = 0.