Boboridis K, Assi A, Indar A, Bunce C, Tyers A G
Adnexal Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London EC1V 2PD, UK.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jan;85(1):99-101. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.1.99.
The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability and reproducibility by physicians of upper lid measurements and to investigate the influence of clinical experience on the learning curve effect.
Both eyes of 22 outpatients were assessed for three basic measures of ptosis: marginal reflex distance (MRD) for upper and lower lids, upper lid skin crease (SC), and levator function (LF). Patients with variable eyelid positions were excluded. The patients were measured twice by a consultant and once by each of a clinical fellow, a specialist registrar, and a senior house officer in random order. Each observer was masked to their colleagues' results and followed a standard measurement protocol. Data were analysed using Bland-Altman plots.
Consultant repeatability was high and consistent, the median difference between measures being 0 for each of the four parameters. Clinically acceptable reproducibility was shown in all measurements for even the least experienced physician and was particularly consistent for extreme observations. There was evidence of a learning curve effect.
These results suggest that interobserver and intraobserver variability in assessment of upper lid ptosis using a standard measurement protocol is low and clinically acceptable when the technique of assessment is standardised.
本研究旨在评估医生对上睑测量的可重复性和再现性,并调查临床经验对学习曲线效应的影响。
对22名门诊患者的双眼进行上睑下垂的三项基本测量:上下睑缘反射距离(MRD)、上睑皮肤皱褶(SC)和提上睑肌功能(LF)。排除眼睑位置可变的患者。由一名会诊医生对患者进行两次测量,临床住院医师、专科住院医师和高级住院医师各对患者进行一次测量,测量顺序随机。每位观察者对其同事的测量结果不知情,并遵循标准测量方案。使用Bland-Altman图分析数据。
会诊医生的测量具有较高的可重复性且结果一致,四个参数每次测量之间的中位数差异均为0。即使是经验最少的医生,所有测量结果的再现性在临床上也是可接受的,对于极端观察结果尤其一致。有证据表明存在学习曲线效应。
这些结果表明,当评估技术标准化时,使用标准测量方案评估上睑下垂时,观察者间和观察者内的变异性较低且在临床上是可接受的。