Jones R A
Agriculture Western Australia (AGWEST), Locked Bag No. 4., Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983, Australia.
Virus Res. 2000 Nov;71(1-2):171-83. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(00)00197-0.
There have been many advances in testing procedures to detect seed-borne virus infection in seed samples. However, scant attention has been given to the implications of improved test results in terms of the economic losses resulting from sowing seed stocks with different amounts of infection. For agricultural and horticultural industries to use the results of tests on representative samples, defined 'threshold' values for percentage seed infection are required that identify acceptable levels of risk of economic losses resulting from sowing the virus-infected seed stocks. Such information is provided by field experiments in which infected seed is sown and the consequences are followed in terms of virus spread, yield losses and infection of newly produced seed. These field experiments need to continue over several years at diverse sites so that they represent a wide range of infection scenarios. Extensive surveys to determine seed-borne virus occurrence in different regions are also required to define areas of greater or lesser risk of economic losses. In this paper, an example is described of how field experiments and surveys were used to define 'threshold' values of seed-borne Cucumber mosaic virus infection in an annual crop (lupin: Lupinus angustifolius) and two such examples are given for pasture species: Cucumber mosaic virus in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum), and Alfalfa mosaic virus in annual burr medic (Medicago polymorpha). The aim of this paper is to encourage others to address the urgent need for similar 'threshold' information with other economically important combinations of seed-borne viruses and host plant.
在检测种子样本中种传病毒感染的检测程序方面已经取得了许多进展。然而,对于改进检测结果在播种不同感染量种子库存所导致的经济损失方面的影响,却很少有人关注。为了农业和园艺产业能够使用对代表性样本的检测结果,需要确定种子感染百分比的定义“阈值”,以识别播种受病毒感染种子库存所导致的经济损失的可接受风险水平。此类信息由田间试验提供,在田间试验中播种受感染种子,并跟踪病毒传播、产量损失和新生产种子感染方面的后果。这些田间试验需要在不同地点持续数年,以便它们代表广泛的感染情况。还需要进行广泛的调查以确定不同地区种传病毒的发生情况,从而界定经济损失风险较大或较小的区域。本文描述了一个例子,说明如何利用田间试验和调查来确定一年生作物(羽扇豆:窄叶羽扇豆)中种传黄瓜花叶病毒感染的“阈值”,并给出了两个牧草物种的此类例子:地下三叶草(三叶草)中的黄瓜花叶病毒,以及一年生多刺苜蓿(多形苜蓿)中的苜蓿花叶病毒。本文的目的是鼓励其他人针对种传病毒与寄主植物的其他具有经济重要性的组合,迫切需要类似的“阈值”信息。