Kielbassa A M, Shohadai S P, Schulte-Mönting J
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Support Care Cancer. 2001 Jan;9(1):40-7. doi: 10.1007/s005200000148.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of commercially available saliva substitutes on the mineral content of pre-demineralized and sound enamel. From 56 bovine incisors 224 enamel specimens were prepared and hand-polished. The specimens were partially covered with nail varnish (control of sound enamel). In group 1, 112 samples were demineralized (18 days; 37 degrees C; pH 5.0) and a portion of the demineralized area was likewise covered with nail varnish. Subsequently, 16 specimens were exposed (14 days; 37 degrees C) to 10 ml of each of several different saliva substitutes (Artisial; Glandosane; Oralube; Saliva medac), or mouthwash solutions (Biotène; Meridol), respectively. Non-carbonated, fluoride-containing mineral water (Eptinger) was used as control. In group 2, the 112 sound enamel specimens were immersed directly in the solutions (without a demineralization period). After immersion, the specimens were cut perpendicular to the surface, and slabs (110 microns) were ground. Contact microradiographs were obtained and studied with a digital image-analyzing system. A dedicated software (TMR 1.24) was used to calculate the mineral content. Sound enamel (group 2) was significantly demineralized after immersion in Biotène and Glandosane (P < 0.001; Kruskal-Wallis). In group 1, mineral loss after storage in Biotène and Glandosane was significantly increased (P < 0.001), compared with the mineral content after demineralization. All other solutions revealed a significant mineral gain (P < 0.01; Wilcoxon), with the most pronounced effects after use of Oralube and mineral water (both containing calcium, phosphates, and fluorides). Therefore, administration of products similar to the last named can be recommended for dentate patients with salivary gland hypofunction.
本体外研究的目的是评估市售唾液替代品对预脱矿和完好牙釉质矿物质含量的影响。从56颗牛切牙制备了224个牙釉质标本并进行手工抛光。标本用指甲油部分覆盖(完好牙釉质的对照)。在第1组中,112个样本进行脱矿处理(18天;37℃;pH 5.0),脱矿区域的一部分同样用指甲油覆盖。随后,16个标本分别暴露于(14天;37℃)几种不同的唾液替代品(Artisial、Glandosane、Oralube、Saliva medac)或漱口水溶液(Biotène、Meridol)各10毫升中。不含碳酸的含氟矿泉水(Eptinger)用作对照。在第2组中,112个完好牙釉质标本直接浸入溶液中(无脱矿期)。浸泡后,将标本垂直于表面切割,磨制薄片(110微米)。获得接触式显微放射照片并用数字图像分析系统进行研究。使用专用软件(TMR 1.24)计算矿物质含量。完好牙釉质(第2组)在浸入Biotène和Glandosane后显著脱矿(P < 0.001;Kruskal-Wallis检验)。在第1组中,与脱矿后的矿物质含量相比,储存在Biotène和Glandosane中的矿物质损失显著增加(P < 0.001)。所有其他溶液均显示矿物质增加显著(P < 0.01;Wilcoxon检验),使用Oralube和矿泉水(均含钙、磷酸盐和氟化物)后效果最为明显。因此,对于唾液腺功能减退的有牙患者,可推荐使用与最后提到的产品类似的产品。