• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

梅奥肺部项目:一种观点。

The Mayo Lung Project: a perspective.

作者信息

Fontana R S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11 Suppl):2352-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2352::aid-cncr7>3.3.co;2-x.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2352::aid-cncr7>3.3.co;2-x
PMID:11147611
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Mayo Lung Project (MLP) was a randomized, controlled, clinical trial designed to determine whether intensive radiologic and cytologic screening for lung carcinoma could reduce lung carcinoma mortality significantly.

METHODS

Half the MLP population was encouraged (and reminded) to undergo free chest X-rays and free sputum cytology tests every 4 months for 6 years, whereas the other half of the population was advised to undergo the 2 tests yearly.

RESULTS

Lung carcinoma incidence rate, resectability, and survivorship were greater in the intensively screened group compared with the control group, but there was no significant difference in the lung carcinoma mortality rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The intensive screening program cannot be recommended as a public health measure because it did not appear to result in decreased lung carcinoma mortality, even though it did yield an increased rate of incidence of apparently indolent tumors.

摘要

背景

梅奥肺癌项目(MLP)是一项随机对照临床试验,旨在确定针对肺癌的强化放射学和细胞学筛查是否能显著降低肺癌死亡率。

方法

MLP人群的一半被鼓励(并得到提醒)每4个月接受一次免费胸部X光检查和免费痰细胞学检查,持续6年,而另一半人群则被建议每年进行这两项检查。

结果

与对照组相比,强化筛查组的肺癌发病率、可切除性和生存率更高,但两组之间的肺癌死亡率没有显著差异。

结论

强化筛查项目不能作为一项公共卫生措施被推荐,因为它似乎并未导致肺癌死亡率下降,尽管它确实使明显惰性肿瘤的发病率有所增加。

相似文献

1
The Mayo Lung Project: a perspective.梅奥肺部项目:一种观点。
Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11 Suppl):2352-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2352::aid-cncr7>3.3.co;2-x.
2
Lung cancer screening results in the National Cancer Institute New York study.美国国立癌症研究所纽约研究中的肺癌筛查结果。
Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11 Suppl):2356-62. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2356::aid-cncr8>3.3.co;2-q.
3
Screening for lung cancer re-examined. A reinterpretation of the Mayo Lung Project randomized trial on lung cancer screening.重新审视肺癌筛查。对梅奥肺癌项目肺癌筛查随机试验的重新解读。
Chest. 1993 Apr;103(4 Suppl):337S-341S.
4
The Mayo Lung Project for early detection and localization of bronchogenic carcinoma: a status report.梅奥肺癌早期检测与定位项目:现状报告
Chest. 1975 May;67(5):511-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.67.5.511.
5
Czech Study on Lung Cancer Screening: post-trial follow-up of lung cancer deaths up to year 15 since enrollment.捷克肺癌筛查研究:自入组以来长达15年的肺癌死亡病例试验后随访。
Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11 Suppl):2363-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11+<2363::aid-cncr9>3.3.co;2-n.
6
Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.肺癌筛查。对梅奥肺癌项目的批判。
Cancer. 1991 Feb 15;67(4 Suppl):1155-64. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4+<1155::aid-cncr2820671509>3.0.co;2-0.
7
Chest X-ray screening improves outcome in lung cancer. A reappraisal of randomized trials on lung cancer screening.胸部X光筛查可改善肺癌治疗结果。对肺癌筛查随机试验的重新评估。
Chest. 1995 Jun;107(6 Suppl):270S-279S. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.6_supplement.270s.
8
Screening for lung cancer. Another look; a different view.肺癌筛查:新视角,别样观。
Chest. 1997 Mar;111(3):754-68. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.3.754.
9
Screening for lung cancer. The Mayo Lung Project revisited.肺癌筛查。梅奥肺癌项目再探讨。
Cancer. 1993 Sep 1;72(5):1573-80. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930901)72:5<1573::aid-cncr2820720514>3.0.co;2-9.
10
Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study.早期肺癌检测:梅奥诊所研究中首次(患病率)放射学和细胞学筛查的结果
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Oct;130(4):561-5. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.4.561.

引用本文的文献

1
The Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms on Automatic Pulmonary Nodule Detection and Classification Tested on Different Datasets That Are Not Derived from LIDC-IDRI: A Systematic Review.深度学习算法在非源自LIDC-IDRI的不同数据集上进行自动肺结节检测和分类的性能:一项系统评价。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Nov 29;9(4):207. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040207.
2
Challenges in Lung Cancer Screening in Latin America.拉丁美洲肺癌筛查面临的挑战。
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-10. doi: 10.1200/JGO.17.00040.
3
Implementing lung cancer screening in the real world: opportunity, challenges and solutions.
在现实世界中实施肺癌筛查:机会、挑战和解决方案。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015 Aug;4(4):353-64. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2015.07.14.
4
Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer.肺癌初始低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查结果。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):1980-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209120.
5
Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.肺癌筛查:肺癌的诊断与管理,第 3 版:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南。
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e78S-e92S. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2350.
6
"Risk homeostasis"or "teachable moment"? the interaction between smoking behavior and lung cancer screening in the Mayo Lung Project.“风险稳态”还是“可教时刻”?梅奥肺癌项目中吸烟行为与肺癌筛查之间的相互作用
Tob Induc Dis. 2011 Jan 24;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-9-2.
7
Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the baseline findings of randomized controlled trials.低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌:随机对照试验基线研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Aug;5(8):1233-9. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e0b977.
8
Integrated CT/bronchoscopy in the central airways: preliminary results.中央气道的CT/支气管镜联合检查:初步结果
Acad Radiol. 2008 Jun;15(6):786-98. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.03.001.
9
Cancer screening in renal transplant recipients: what is the evidence?肾移植受者的癌症筛查:证据是什么?
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Mar;3 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S87-S100. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03320807.