Suppr超能文献

雾化吸入伊洛前列素疗法无法替代重度肺动脉高压患者长期静脉输注依前列醇(前列环素)。

Aerosolized iloprost therapy could not replace long-term IV epoprostenol (prostacyclin) administration in severe pulmonary hypertension.

作者信息

Schenk P, Petkov V, Madl C, Kramer L, Kneussl M, Ziesche R, Lang I

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine IV, University of Vienna, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Austria.

出版信息

Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1):296-300. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1.296.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To switch patients with severe pulmonary hypertension and previous life-threatening catheter-related complications from long-term IV epoprostenol therapy to aerosolized iloprost therapy.

DESIGN

Open, uncontrolled trial.

SETTING

Medical ICU of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Two patients with primary pulmonary hypertension and one patient with pulmonary hypertension after surgical closure of atrial septal defect (mean pulmonary artery pressure > or =50 mm Hg). All were classified as New York Heart Association class II under treatment with continuous IV epoprostenol for 4 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Stepwise reduction of IV epoprostenol (1 ng/kg/min steps every 3 to 10 h) during repeated inhalations of aerosolized iloprost (150 to 300 microg/d with 6 to 18 inhalations/d). Continuous pulmonary and systemic arterial monitoring were performed.

RESULTS

Aerosolized iloprost reduced pulmonary artery pressure by 49%, 49%, and 45%, respectively, and increased cardiac output by 70%, 75%, and 41% in the three patients. The effect lasted for 20 min and was similar at different doses of IV epoprostenol. Persistent treatment change to inhaled iloprost could not be achieved because all patients developed signs of right heart failure. After termination of iloprost inhalations, return to standard epoprostenol therapy led to clinical and hemodynamic restoration.

CONCLUSIONS

Although aerosolized iloprost demonstrated short-term hemodynamic effects, it could not be utilized as alternative chronic vasodilator in patients with severe pulmonary hypertension.

摘要

目的

将患有严重肺动脉高压且既往有危及生命的导管相关并发症的患者,从长期静脉注射依前列醇治疗转换为雾化吸入伊洛前列素治疗。

设计

开放性、非对照试验。

地点

大学医院的医疗重症监护病房。

患者

两名原发性肺动脉高压患者和一名房间隔缺损手术闭合后出现肺动脉高压的患者(平均肺动脉压≥50mmHg)。所有患者在持续静脉注射依前列醇治疗4年的情况下,均被分类为纽约心脏协会II级。

干预措施

在重复雾化吸入伊洛前列素(150至300微克/天,每天6至18次吸入)期间,逐步减少静脉注射依前列醇(每3至10小时以1纳克/千克/分钟的步长)。进行持续的肺动脉和体动脉监测。

结果

在三名患者中,雾化吸入伊洛前列素分别使肺动脉压降低了49%、49%和45%,心输出量增加了70%、75%和41%。效果持续20分钟,在不同剂量的静脉注射依前列醇时相似。由于所有患者均出现右心衰竭迹象,无法实现持续转换为吸入伊洛前列素治疗。伊洛前列素吸入终止后,恢复标准依前列醇治疗导致临床和血流动力学恢复。

结论

尽管雾化吸入伊洛前列素显示出短期血流动力学效应,但它不能用作重度肺动脉高压患者的替代慢性血管扩张剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验