• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peak flow diaries in childhood asthma are unreliable.儿童哮喘的峰流速日记不可靠。
Thorax. 2001 Mar;56(3):180-2. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.3.180.
2
[The peak flow meter: limited role in the diagnosis and follow-up of children with asthma].[峰值流量计:在儿童哮喘诊断和随访中的作用有限]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 May 4;146(18):842-6.
3
Diary keeping in asthma: comparison of written and electronic methods.哮喘患者的日记记录:书面记录与电子记录方法的比较
BMJ. 1993 Feb 20;306(6876):487-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6876.487.
4
Short-term compliance with peak flow monitoring: results from a study of inner city children with asthma.峰值流量监测的短期依从性:一项针对城市中心哮喘儿童的研究结果
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996 Apr;21(4):203-10. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199604)21:4<203::AID-PPUL1>3.0.CO;2-P.
5
Compliance with and accuracy of daily self-assessment of peak expiratory flows (PEF) in asthmatic subjects over a three month period.哮喘患者在三个月期间每日呼气峰值流量(PEF)自我评估的依从性和准确性。
Eur Respir J. 1996 May;9(5):880-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09050880.
6
Patient compliance with assessing and monitoring of asthma.患者对哮喘评估和监测的依从性。
J Asthma. 2009 Dec;46(10):1027-31. doi: 10.3109/02770900903229685.
7
Objective measurements of compliance in asthma treatment.哮喘治疗依从性的客观测量。
Ann Allergy. 1994 Dec;73(6):527-32.
8
Accuracy of mini peak flow meters in indicating changes in lung function in children with asthma.迷你峰流速仪在指示哮喘儿童肺功能变化方面的准确性。
BMJ. 1994 Feb 26;308(6928):572-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6928.572.
9
The quality of home spirometry in school children with asthma.哮喘学龄儿童家庭肺功能测定的质量
Thorax. 2001 Mar;56(3):183-5. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.3.183.
10
[Compliance with and acceptability of a new electronic peak flow meter, the PiKo-1].[新型电子呼气峰值流量计PiKo-1的依从性与可接受性]
Rev Mal Respir. 2005 Dec;22(6 Pt 1):935-41. doi: 10.1019/200530118.

引用本文的文献

1
Asthma Symptom Self-Monitoring Methods for Children and Adolescents: Present and Future.儿童和青少年哮喘症状自我监测方法:现状与未来
Children (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;12(8):997. doi: 10.3390/children12080997.
2
eHealth Technologies for Monitoring Pediatric Asthma at Home: Scoping Review.家庭监测小儿哮喘的电子健康技术:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 21;25:e45896. doi: 10.2196/45896.
3
Pulmonary Function Testing in Asthmatic Children. Tests to Assess Outpatients During the Covid-19 Pandemic.哮喘儿童的肺功能测试。在新冠疫情期间评估门诊患者的测试。
Front Pediatr. 2020 Nov 17;8:571112. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.571112. eCollection 2020.
4
Lung Function Variability in Children and Adolescents With and Without Asthma (LUV Study): Protocol for a Prospective, Nonrandomized, Clinical Trial.有和无哮喘的儿童及青少年的肺功能变异性(LUV研究):一项前瞻性、非随机临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Aug 7;9(8):e20350. doi: 10.2196/20350.
5
Addressing Reduced Laboratory-Based Pulmonary Function Testing During a Pandemic.应对大流行期间基于实验室的肺功能测试减少的问题。
Chest. 2020 Dec;158(6):2502-2510. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.065. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Design and Benchmark Testing for Open Architecture Reconfigurable Mobile Spirometer and Exhaled Breath Monitor with GPS and Data Telemetry.具有GPS和数据遥测功能的开放式架构可重构移动肺活量计和呼气监测仪的设计与基准测试。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Aug 21;9(3):100. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9030100.
7
Vortex Whistle and Smart Phone Application for Peak Flow Recordings in Asthmatic Children: A Feasibility Study.涡旋哨和智能手机应用程序在哮喘儿童中的峰流速记录:一项可行性研究。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Nov;25(11):1077-1082. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0270. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
8
Tools in Asthma Evaluation and Management: When and How to Use Them?哮喘评估和管理中的工具:何时以及如何使用它们?
Indian J Pediatr. 2018 Aug;85(8):651-657. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2462-6. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Diagnosis of asthma in symptomatic children based on measures of lung function: an analysis of data from a population-based birth cohort study.基于肺功能测量对有症状儿童哮喘的诊断:一项基于人群的出生队列研究数据分析
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017 Oct;1(2):114-123. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30008-1.
10
Randomized Trial of Interventions to Improve Childhood Asthma in Homes with Wood-burning Stoves.在使用燃木炉灶的家庭中改善儿童哮喘的干预措施随机试验。
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 13;125(9):097010. doi: 10.1289/EHP849.

本文引用的文献

1
Compliance with peak expiratory flow monitoring in home management of asthma.哮喘居家管理中呼气峰值流量监测的依从性。
Chest. 1998 Apr;113(4):968-72. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.4.968.
2
Medications used by children with asthma living in the inner city.居住在市中心的哮喘儿童所使用的药物。
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3 Pt 1):349-54. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.349.
3
Short-term compliance with peak flow monitoring: results from a study of inner city children with asthma.峰值流量监测的短期依从性:一项针对城市中心哮喘儿童的研究结果
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996 Apr;21(4):203-10. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199604)21:4<203::AID-PPUL1>3.0.CO;2-P.
4
Impact of a nurse-led home management training programme in children admitted to hospital with acute asthma: a randomised controlled study.护士主导的家庭管理培训计划对急性哮喘住院儿童的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Thorax. 1997 Mar;52(3):223-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.52.3.223.
5
Compliance with and accuracy of daily self-assessment of peak expiratory flows (PEF) in asthmatic subjects over a three month period.哮喘患者在三个月期间每日呼气峰值流量(PEF)自我评估的依从性和准确性。
Eur Respir J. 1996 May;9(5):880-5. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09050880.
6
Diary keeping in asthma: comparison of written and electronic methods.哮喘患者的日记记录:书面记录与电子记录方法的比较
BMJ. 1993 Feb 20;306(6876):487-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6876.487.
7
Asthma at the interface: bridging the gap between general practice and a district general hospital.哮喘的衔接:弥合全科医疗与地区综合医院之间的差距
Arch Dis Child. 1994 Apr;70(4):313-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.70.4.313.
8
Do subjects investigated for occupational asthma through serial peak expiratory flow measurements falsify their results?通过连续呼气峰值流量测量来调查职业性哮喘的受试者会伪造他们的结果吗?
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):601-7. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70258-x.

儿童哮喘的峰流速日记不可靠。

Peak flow diaries in childhood asthma are unreliable.

作者信息

Kamps A W, Roorda R J, Brand P L

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Pulmonology, Isala Klinieken, Weezenlanden Hospital, PO Box 10500, 8000 GM Zwolle, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Thorax. 2001 Mar;56(3):180-2. doi: 10.1136/thorax.56.3.180.

DOI:10.1136/thorax.56.3.180
PMID:11182008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1758788/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A study was undertaken to investigate the compliance with and accuracy of peak flow diaries in childhood asthma.

METHODS

Forty asthmatic children (5-16 years) were asked to perform peak flow measurements twice daily for 4 weeks by means of an electronic peak flow meter and to record values in a written diary. Patients and parents were unaware that the device stored the peak flow values on a microchip. In random order, half of the patients were only told that the device allowed for more accurate assessment of peak flow while the other half were told that accurate recording of peak flow was important because the results would be used in guiding adjustments to treatment. Data in the written diary (reported data) were compared with those from the electronic diary (actual data).

RESULTS

In the entire study population the mean (SD) actual compliance (77.1 (20.5)%) was much lower than the mean reported compliance (95.7 (9.1)%) (95% CI for difference 12.7% to 24.4%) The percentage of correct peak flow entries decreased from 56% to <50% from the first to the last study week (p<0.04), mainly as a result of an increase in self-invented peak flow entries. Results were comparable for both groups. For incorrect peak flow entries the mean difference between written and electronically recorded entries ranged from -72 to 34 l/min per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Peak flow diaries kept by asthmatic children are unreliable. Electronic peak flow meters should be used if peak flow monitoring is required in children with asthma.

摘要

背景

开展了一项研究,以调查儿童哮喘患者峰流速日记的依从性和准确性。

方法

40名哮喘儿童(5 - 16岁)被要求使用电子峰流速仪每天进行两次峰流速测量,持续4周,并在书面日记中记录测量值。患者及其家长并不知道该设备会将峰流速值存储在微芯片上。随机安排,一半患者仅被告知该设备能更准确地评估峰流速,而另一半患者被告知准确记录峰流速很重要,因为结果将用于指导治疗调整。将书面日记中的数据(报告数据)与电子日记中的数据(实际数据)进行比较。

结果

在整个研究人群中,实际平均依从性(标准差)为77.1(20.5)%,远低于报告的平均依从性(95.7(9.1)%)(差异的95%置信区间为12.7%至24.4%)。从研究的第一周到最后一周,正确的峰流速记录百分比从56%降至<50%(p<0.04),主要原因是自行编造的峰流速记录增加。两组结果具有可比性。对于错误的峰流速记录,每位患者书面记录与电子记录之间的平均差异在-72至34升/分钟之间。

结论

哮喘儿童所记的峰流速日记不可靠。如果哮喘儿童需要进行峰流速监测,应使用电子峰流速仪。