Shaw M J, Beebe T J, Tomshine P A, Adlis S A, Cass O W
Health Research Center, Park Nicollet Clinic, HealthSystem, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, USA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Feb;32(2):142-7. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200102000-00010.
The purpose of our study was to assess the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) in patients having colonoscopies. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in large, multispecialty clinic. Eighty-six patients were referred for colonoscopies. The interventions were standard education versus standard education plus CAI, and the outcome measures were anxiety, comprehension, and satisfaction. Computer-assisted instruction had no effect on patients' anxiety. The group receiving CAI demonstrated better overall comprehension (p < 0.001). However, Comprehension of certain aspects of serious complications and appropriate postsedation behavior were unaffected by educational method. Patients in the CAI group were more likely to indicate satisfaction with the amount of information provided when compared with the standard education counterparts (p = 0.001). Overall satisfaction was unaffected by educational method. Computer-assisted instruction for colonoscopy provided better comprehension and greater satisfaction with the adequacy of education than standard education. Computer-assisted instruction helps physicians meet their educational responsibilities with no decrement to the interpersonal aspects of the patient-physician relationship.
我们研究的目的是评估计算机辅助教学(CAI)在接受结肠镜检查患者中的有效性。我们在一家大型多专科诊所进行了一项随机对照试验。86名患者被转诊接受结肠镜检查。干预措施为标准教育与标准教育加CAI,结果指标为焦虑、理解和满意度。计算机辅助教学对患者的焦虑没有影响。接受CAI的组总体理解能力更好(p<0.001)。然而,对严重并发症某些方面的理解以及适当的镇静后行为不受教育方法的影响。与接受标准教育的患者相比,CAI组的患者更有可能对所提供信息的数量表示满意(p = 0.001)。总体满意度不受教育方法的影响。与标准教育相比,结肠镜检查的计算机辅助教学能提供更好的理解,并对教育的充分性有更高的满意度。计算机辅助教学有助于医生履行其教育职责,而不会削弱医患关系中的人际方面。