Kuntsi J, Stevenson J
Behavioural Sciences Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London Medical School, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, England.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2000 Mar;3(1):1-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1009580718281.
Hyperactivity has attracted a large amount of research interest in recent years. Here we review developments in genetic research and in research testing psychological theories of the condition. Family, adoptee and twin studies indicate a strong role for genetic factors in the etiology of hyperactivity. Evidence is emerging also from molecular genetic studies, implicating specific genes that may be involved. At the level of cognitive functioning, a divided, focused or sustained attention deficit does not seem to be a 'core' deficit in hyperactivity. Although children with hyperactivity often perform poorly on certain executive function tasks, there is disagreement about the interpretation of these findings. The association reported in some studies between a slow inhibitory process and hyperactivity may reflect a generally slow, variable in speed and inaccurate pattern of responding. Hypotheses about psychological mechanisms such as state regulation or delay aversion provide alternative, and particularly encouraging, interpretations of the findings. We discuss the possible integration of the two lines of research--those of genetic research and research on psychological mechanisms.
近年来,多动行为吸引了大量的研究关注。在此,我们回顾一下在该病症的基因研究以及检验其心理学理论的研究方面的进展。家庭、领养及双胞胎研究表明,基因因素在多动行为的病因学中起着重要作用。分子遗传学研究也正在产生相关证据,表明某些特定基因可能与之有关。在认知功能层面,注意力分散、集中或持续方面的缺陷似乎并非多动行为的“核心”缺陷。尽管患有多动行为的儿童在某些执行功能任务上往往表现不佳,但对于这些研究结果的解读存在分歧。一些研究报告的缓慢抑制过程与多动行为之间的关联,可能反映出一种普遍缓慢、速度多变且反应不准确的模式。关于诸如状态调节或延迟厌恶等心理机制的假说,为这些研究结果提供了其他的、尤其令人鼓舞的解读。我们讨论了这两条研究路线——基因研究和心理机制研究——可能的整合情况。