Franz V H, Gegenfurtner K R, Bülthoff H H, Fahle M
Max-Planck-Institut für Biologische Kybernetik, Spemannstr. 38, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Psychol Sci. 2000 Jan;11(1):20-5. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00209.
Neuropsychological studies prompted the theory that the primate visual system might be organized into two parallel pathways, one for conscious perception and one for guiding action. Supporting evidence in healthy subjects seemed to come from a dissociation in visual illusions: In previous studies, the Ebbinghaus (or Titchener) illusion deceived perceptual judgments of size, but only marginally influenced the size estimates used in grasping. Contrary to those results, the findings from the present study show that there is no difference in the sizes of the perceptual and grasp illusions if the perceptual and grasping tasks are appropriately matched. We show that the differences found previously can be accounted for by a hitherto unknown, nonadditive effect in the illusion. We conclude that the illusion does not provide evidence for the existence of two distinct pathways for perception and action in the visual system.
神经心理学研究催生了这样一种理论,即灵长类动物的视觉系统可能被组织成两条平行的通路,一条用于意识感知,另一条用于指导行动。健康受试者的支持性证据似乎来自视觉错觉中的一种分离现象:在先前的研究中,埃宾浩斯(或铁钦纳)错觉会误导大小的感知判断,但对抓握时使用的大小估计影响甚微。与这些结果相反,本研究的发现表明,如果感知任务和抓握任务适当匹配,感知错觉和抓握错觉的大小没有差异。我们表明,先前发现的差异可以由错觉中一种迄今未知的非累加效应来解释。我们得出结论,该错觉并不能为视觉系统中存在两条不同的感知和行动通路提供证据。