Ringash J
Departments of Radiation Oncology and Health Administration, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2001 Feb 20;164(4):469-76.
A previous review by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination (now the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care) in 1994 indicated fair evidence to exclude mammographic breast cancer screening of women aged 40-49 from the periodic health examination. This current review considers the available new and updated evidence regarding the effect of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality among women in this age group at average risk of breast cancer.
Screening mammography starting at either age 40 or age 50.
Reduction in breast cancer mortality.
The MEDLINE and CANCERLIT databases were searched for relevant articles published from 1966 to January 2000. Of 68 references obtained, at least 22 were published after the 1994 review. To date, the only trial designed to assess the mortality benefits of screening mammography among women aged 40-49 did not have adequate power to exclude a clinically significant benefit. Other results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are post-hoc subgroup analyses of larger trials.
BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Screening mammography offers the potential for significant benefits in addition to mortality reduction, including early diagnosis, less aggressive therapy and improved cosmetic results. However, the risks of screening include increased biopsy rates and the psychological effects of false reassurance or false-positive results. Although several of the trials reviewed constitute level I evidence (RCT), at present their conflicting results, methodologic differences and, most important, uncertainty about the risk:benefit ratio of screening precludes the assignment of a "good" or "fair" rating to recommendations drawn from them.
The strength of evidence was evaluated using the methods of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. A high value was placed on changes in survival. When evidence was available, value was also placed on potential quality-of-life implications.
Current evidence regarding the effectiveness of screening mammography does not suggest the inclusion of the manoeuvre in, or its exclusion from, the periodic health examination of women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer (grade C recommendation). Upon reaching the age of 40, Canadian women should be informed of the potential benefits and risks of screening mammography and assisted in deciding at what age they wish to initiate the manoeuvre.
The findings of this analysis were reviewed through an iterative process by the members of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care is funded through a partnership between the Provincial and Territorial Ministries of Health and Health Canada.
加拿大定期健康检查特别工作组(现更名为加拿大预防性医疗特别工作组)1994年的一项既往综述表明,有一定证据支持在定期健康检查中不将40 - 49岁女性的乳腺钼靶乳腺癌筛查纳入其中。本次综述考量了关于乳腺钼靶筛查对该年龄段患乳腺癌平均风险女性乳腺癌死亡率影响的最新可得证据。
从40岁或50岁开始进行乳腺钼靶筛查。
降低乳腺癌死亡率。
检索了MEDLINE和CANCERLIT数据库中1966年至2000年1月发表的相关文章。在获取的68篇参考文献中,至少有22篇是在1994年综述之后发表的。迄今为止,唯一一项旨在评估40 - 49岁女性乳腺钼靶筛查死亡率获益的试验,其检验效能不足以排除具有临床意义的获益。随机对照试验(RCT)的其他结果是对大型试验的事后亚组分析。
益处、危害和成本:乳腺钼靶筛查除了能降低死亡率外,还可能带来显著益处,包括早期诊断、采用侵袭性较小的治疗方法以及改善美容效果。然而,筛查的风险包括活检率增加以及错误安心或假阳性结果带来的心理影响。尽管所综述的几项试验构成了I级证据(RCT),但目前它们相互矛盾的结果、方法学差异,以及最重要的是筛查风险效益比的不确定性,使得无法对从中得出的建议给予“好”或“中等”的评级。
采用加拿大预防性医疗特别工作组的方法评估证据强度。对生存率的变化给予高度重视。如有证据,也会考量对潜在生活质量的影响。
关于乳腺钼靶筛查有效性的现有证据并不支持将其纳入或排除在40 - 49岁患乳腺癌平均风险女性的定期健康检查中(C级推荐)。年满40岁时,应告知加拿大女性乳腺钼靶筛查的潜在益处和风险,并协助她们决定希望在什么年龄开始进行该项检查。
加拿大预防性医疗特别工作组的成员通过反复过程对该分析结果进行了审查。
加拿大预防性医疗特别工作组由各省和地区卫生部与加拿大卫生部合作资助。