Hoare D G
Division of Sport Sciences, Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra.
J Sci Med Sport. 2000 Dec;3(4):391-405. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(00)80006-7.
Talent identification programs have traditionally focused on individual sports with discrete physical and physiological characteristics. Limited attention has been directed toward predicting performance in team sports. This study measured anthropometric and physiological attributes of 125 male and 123 female junior basketball players competing at the Australian Under 16 championships in 1998. In addition, experienced coaches rated the performance of players during the championships. Performance profiles were compared across playing positions and by playing performance ('Best versus Rest'). Differences in anthropometric characteristics were present across some playing positions for both males and females. Speed and agility differences between some playing positions were also present. Best players differed to Rest players on a number of anthropometric and physiological variables for both males and females. Regression analyses indicated the test variables accounted for a significant proportion of variance in playing performance for both females (41.3%) and males (38.3%). A Z score analysis indicated good alignment between the test and coach ranking of the Best player in four out of five positions for females and two out of five positions for males. Anthropometric and physiological profiling can contribute to selection procedures in junior basketball, however determinants of success are multi-factorial.
传统上,人才识别项目主要关注具有离散身体和生理特征的个人运动项目。对于团队运动项目中运动员表现的预测,人们关注较少。本研究测量了1998年参加澳大利亚16岁以下锦标赛的125名男性和123名女性青少年篮球运动员的人体测量学和生理学特征。此外,经验丰富的教练对锦标赛期间运动员的表现进行了评分。对不同比赛位置和比赛表现(“最佳球员与其他球员”)的表现特征进行了比较。男性和女性在一些比赛位置上的人体测量学特征存在差异。一些比赛位置之间的速度和敏捷性也存在差异。在许多人体测量学和生理学变量方面,最佳球员与其他球员存在差异,无论男性还是女性皆是如此。回归分析表明,测试变量在女性(41.3%)和男性(38.3%)的比赛表现差异中占了很大比例。Z分数分析表明,在女性的五个位置中有四个位置以及男性的五个位置中有两个位置上,测试结果与教练对最佳球员的排名具有良好的一致性。人体测量学和生理学特征分析有助于青少年篮球的选拔程序,然而,成功的决定因素是多方面的。