• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9)和糖类抗原72-4(CA 72-4)在可切除胃癌患者随访中的临床应用价值

Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer.

作者信息

Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Roviello F

机构信息

Istituto di Scienze Chirurgiche, U.O. Chirurgia Oncologica, University of Siena, 53100, Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2001 Jan;181(1):16-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00549-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00549-3
PMID:11248169
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this longitudinal study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the serum tumor markers CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the early diagnosis of recurrence of gastric cancer.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-three patients who had undergone potentially curative surgery were considered. Serum samples were obtained preoperatively, 1 week after surgery, and at every follow-up examination. Mean follow-up time for the entire patient population was 41 +/- 33 months, and 71 +/- 27 months for patients classified as disease-free.

RESULTS

Preoperative positivity was 16% for CEA, 35% for CA 19-9, and 20% for CA 72-4. Recurrence of disease was found in 75 patients (56%). Marker sensitivity in recurrent cases was 44% for CEA, 56% for CA 19-9, and 51% for CA 72-4; the combined use of the three markers increased sensitivity to 87%, which reached 100% in patients with positive preoperative levels. Marker specificity, evaluated in 58 disease-free patients, was 79% for CEA, 74% for CA 19-9, and 97% for CA 72-4.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined assay of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 may be useful for early diagnosis of recurrence of gastric cancer; however, only CA 72-4 positivity should be considered a specific predictor of tumor recurrence.

摘要

背景

本纵向研究的目的是评估血清肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9)和糖类抗原72-4(CA 72-4)在胃癌复发早期诊断中的有效性。

方法

研究纳入了133例接受了根治性手术的患者。术前、术后1周以及每次随访检查时采集血清样本。全体患者的平均随访时间为41±33个月,无病患者的平均随访时间为71±27个月。

结果

术前CEA阳性率为16%,CA 19-9为35%,CA 72-4为20%。75例患者(56%)出现疾病复发。复发病例中,CEA的标志物敏感性为44%,CA 19-9为56%,CA 72-4为51%;三种标志物联合使用可将敏感性提高至87%,术前水平阳性的患者中该敏感性达到100%。在58例无病患者中评估的标志物特异性,CEA为79%,CA 19-9为74%,CA 72-4为97%。

结论

CEA、CA 19-9和CA 72-4联合检测可能有助于胃癌复发的早期诊断;然而,只有CA 72-4阳性应被视为肿瘤复发的特异性预测指标。

相似文献

1
Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer.癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA 19-9)和糖类抗原72-4(CA 72-4)在可切除胃癌患者随访中的临床应用价值
Am J Surg. 2001 Jan;181(1):16-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00549-3.
2
Preoperative positivity of serum tumor markers is a strong predictor of hematogenous recurrence of gastric cancer.血清肿瘤标志物术前呈阳性是胃癌血行复发的有力预测指标。
J Surg Oncol. 2001 Dec;78(4):253-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.1163.
3
Tumor markers for diagnosis, monitoring of recurrence and prognosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.用于上消化道癌患者诊断、复发监测及预后评估的肿瘤标志物。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(23):10267-72. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.23.10267.
4
Comparison of CA 72-4, CA 19-9 and CEA in the diagnosis and monitoring of gastric cancer.CA 72-4、CA 19-9和癌胚抗原在胃癌诊断及监测中的比较
Int J Biol Markers. 1995 Apr-Jun;10(2):100-6. doi: 10.1177/172460089501000206.
5
Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence.胃癌患者血清CA72-4、CEA、TPA、CA19-9和CA125水平的比较及其与复发的相关性
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jul-Aug;49(46):1157-60.
6
CEA, CA 19-9, and CA-50 in monitoring gastric carcinoma.癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9及糖类抗原50在胃癌监测中的应用
Am J Clin Oncol. 1997 Aug;20(4):348-53. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199708000-00005.
7
Combined detection of CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 in the diagnosis and prognosis of resectable gastric cancer.联合检测癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9、糖类抗原242和糖类抗原50在可切除胃癌诊断及预后评估中的应用
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(15):6295-300. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.15.6295.
8
Clinical significance and prognostic value of CA72-4 compared with CEA and CA19-9 in patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者中CA72-4与CEA和CA19-9相比的临床意义及预后价值
Dis Markers. 2000;16(3-4):105-10. doi: 10.1155/2000/595492.
9
Risk factors for liver metastases after curative surgical procedures for gastric cancer: a prospective study of 208 patients treated with surgical resection.胃癌根治性手术后肝转移的危险因素:对208例行手术切除患者的前瞻性研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Jan;198(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.08.013.
10
Cutoff value of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 elevation levels for monitoring recurrence in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.癌胚抗原和糖类抗原 19-9 升高水平的截断值用于监测可切除胃腺癌患者的复发。
Int J Biol Markers. 2009 Oct-Dec;24(4):258-64. doi: 10.1177/172460080902400407.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-based dynamic CEA trajectory and prognosis in gastric cancer.基于机器学习的胃癌动态癌胚抗原轨迹与预后
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1221. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14623-w.
2
Diagnostic Significance in Estimating Tumor Burden Using Extracellular Salivary Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer Patients.利用细胞外唾液生物标志物评估胃癌患者肿瘤负荷的诊断意义
J Clin Med. 2025 May 21;14(10):3596. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103596.
3
Promising Gastric Cancer Biomarkers-Focus on Tryptophan Metabolism via the Kynurenine Pathway.有前景的胃癌生物标志物——聚焦于通过犬尿氨酸途径的色氨酸代谢
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 14;26(8):3706. doi: 10.3390/ijms26083706.
4
Global progress and future prospects of early gastric cancer screening.早期胃癌筛查的全球进展与未来前景
J Cancer. 2024 Apr 8;15(10):3045-3064. doi: 10.7150/jca.95311. eCollection 2024.
5
Plasma EBV DNA as a prognostic factor in EBV associated gastric cancer: a multicenter, prospective study (EBV PRESAGE study).血浆EBV DNA作为EBV相关胃癌的预后因素:一项多中心前瞻性研究(EBV PRESAGE研究)
Front Oncol. 2023 Oct 24;13:1276138. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276138. eCollection 2023.
6
Molecular Targets of Aptamers in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Cancer Detection, Therapeutic Applications, and Associated Mechanisms.适体在胃肠道癌症中的分子靶点:癌症检测、治疗应用及相关机制
J Cancer. 2023 Aug 6;14(13):2491-2516. doi: 10.7150/jca.85260. eCollection 2023.
7
Capitalizing glycomic changes for improved biomarker-based cancer diagnostics.利用糖组学变化改进基于生物标志物的癌症诊断
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2023;4(3):366-395. doi: 10.37349/etat.2023.00140. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
8
A Novel Gene List Identifies Tumors with a Stromal-Mesenchymal Phenotype and Worse Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.一个新的基因列表可识别具有基质-间充质表型且预后较差的胃癌肿瘤。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;15(11):3035. doi: 10.3390/cancers15113035.
9
Recent Trends and Advancements in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastric Cancer.胃癌诊断与治疗的最新趋势及进展
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 15;14(22):5615. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225615.
10
Novel Drug Delivery Systems as an Emerging Platform for Stomach Cancer Therapy.新型药物递送系统作为胃癌治疗的新兴平台
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 29;14(8):1576. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081576.