Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.
作者信息
Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Entwistle V, Coulter A, O'Connor A, Rovner D R
机构信息
College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI 48823, USA.
出版信息
BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):664-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.664.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.临床疗效总结的患者选择模块：一项提议。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 17;322(7287):664-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.664.
2
Evidence-based medicine in practice: limiting or facilitating patient choice?实践中的循证医学：限制还是促进患者选择？
Health Expect. 2002 Jun;5(2):95-103. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00168.x.
3
Drive to improve patient choice within the UK NHS. More patient involvement in treatment decisions could lead to more efficient NHS, experts say.推动在英国国民医疗服务体系（NHS）内增加患者选择。专家表示，患者更多地参与治疗决策可能会使NHS更高效。
Lancet. 2004 Jan 24;363(9405):302. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15430-x.
4
How patients make treatment choices.患者如何做出治疗选择。
Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008 Aug;5(8):426-33. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1189.
5
6
Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age.互联网时代基于证据的患者选择与消费者健康信息学
J Med Internet Res. 2001 Apr-Jun;3(2):E19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e19.
7
[Rehabilitation of Alcoholaddiction].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2016 Aug;55(4):256-66. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107025. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
8
www.educatingpatients.com?www.educatingpatients.com?（此句中“?”并非完整句子内容，单独翻译不太符合正常语义，大致意思是“教育患者的网站（网址）？” 但严格按要求翻译是：“www.教育患者.com?” ）
Health Data Manag. 2000 Mar;8(3):99-100, 102, 104-6.
9
Patient information, risk and choice.
Anaesthesia. 2003 May;58(5):409-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03194.x.
10
Creating a conversation: insights from the development of a decision aid.开展对话：决策辅助工具开发的见解
PLoS Med. 2007 Aug;4(8):e233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040233.
引用本文的文献
1
The challenge of equipoise in trials with a surgical and non-surgical comparison: a qualitative synthesis using meta-ethnography.具有手术和非手术比较的试验中的均衡挑战：使用荟萃元分析的定性综合。
Trials. 2021 Oct 7;22(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05403-5.
2
Assessing attitudes of patient-centered care among chiropractic students at a South African university.评估南非一所大学整脊专业学生对以患者为中心的护理的态度。
J Chiropr Educ. 2022 Mar 1;36(1):94-102. doi: 10.7899/JCE-21-2.
3
Mental health pharmacists views on shared decision-making for antipsychotics in serious mental illness.心理健康药剂师对严重精神疾病中抗精神病药物共同决策的看法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Oct;38(5):1191-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0352-z. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
4
Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information: a content analysis of vaccination-related webpages.比较支持和反对疫苗接种的在线信息质量：疫苗接种相关网页的内容分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 15;16:38. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2722-9.
5
Qualitative Evaluation of Medical Information Processing Needs of 60 Women Choosing Ovarian Cancer Surveillance or Prophylactic Oophorectomy.60名选择卵巢癌监测或预防性卵巢切除术的女性的医疗信息处理需求的定性评估
J Genet Couns. 2002 Apr;11(2):81-96. doi: 10.1023/A:1014571420844.
6
Shared decision making: using health information technology to integrate patient choice into primary care.共同决策：利用健康信息技术将患者选择纳入初级保健。
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar;1(1):123-33. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0023-5.
7
Patient factors in the implementation of decision aids in general practice: a qualitative study.患者因素在一般实践中决策辅助工具的实施：一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):45-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00556.x. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
8
Considering 'balance' in information.考虑信息中的“平衡”。
Health Expect. 2007 Dec;10(4):307-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00469.x.
9
Decision aids in routine practice: lessons from the breast cancer initiative.常规实践中的决策辅助工具：乳腺癌倡议的经验教训。
Health Expect. 2006 Sep;9(3):255-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00393.x.
10
Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.整合决策与心理健康干预研究：研究方向
Clin Psychol (New York). 2006;13(1):9-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2006.00002.x.
本文引用的文献
1
Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities.在日常实践中实施共同决策：障碍与机遇
Health Expect. 2000 Sep;3(3):182-191. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00093.x.
2
Supporting and resourcing treatment decision-making: some policy considerations.支持治疗决策并提供相关资源：一些政策考量
Health Expect. 2000 Mar;3(1):77-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00087.x.
3
Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease.针对缺血性心脏病患者的交互式视盘决策辅助工具的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Oct;15(10):685-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91139.x.
4
Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications.为考虑影响癌症预后的治疗方案的患者提供的决策辅助工具：疗效证据及政策影响
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999(25):67-80. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024212.
5
Feasibility and effects of decision aids.决策辅助工具的可行性与效果
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):112-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000114.
6
National electronic Library for Health (NeLH).国家健康电子图书馆（NeLH）。
BMJ. 1999 Dec 4;319(7223):1476-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1476.
7
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.面向面临健康治疗或筛查决策的患者的决策辅助工具：系统评价
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):731-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731.
8
Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.医患互动中的决策：重新审视共同治疗决策模型。
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Sep;49(5):651-61. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00145-8.
9
Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.与患者的合作关系：共同临床决策的利弊
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997 Apr;2(2):112-21. doi: 10.1177/135581969700200209.
10
Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?与患者共同做决策：信息是否足够充分？
BMJ. 1999 Jan 30;318(7179):318-22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7179.318.
Zotero 插件