• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为父母提供的基于工作的反贫困项目可以提高孩子的学业成绩和社会行为表现。

Work-based antipoverty programs for parents can enhance the school performance and social behavior of children.

作者信息

Huston A C, Duncan G J, Granger R, Bos J, McLoyd V, Mistry R, Crosby D, Gibson C, Magnuson K, Romich J, Ventura A

机构信息

University of Texas, Department of Human Ecology, Austin 78712, USA.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):318-36. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00281.

DOI:10.1111/1467-8624.00281
PMID:11280487
Abstract

We assess the impact of the New Hope Project, an antipoverty program tested in a random assignment experimental design, on family functioning and developmental outcomes for preschool- and school-aged children (N = 913). New Hope offered wage supplements sufficient to raise family income above the poverty threshold and subsidies for child care and health insurance to adults who worked full-time. New Hope had strong positive effects on boys' academic achievement, classroom behavior skills, positive social behavior, and problem behaviors, as reported by teachers, and on boys' own expectations for advanced education and occupational aspirations. There were not corresponding program effects for girls. The child outcomes may have resulted from a combination of the following: Children in New Hope families spent more time in formal child care programs and other structured activities away from home than did children in control families. New Hope parents were employed more, had more material resources, reported more social support, and expressed less stress and more optimism about achieving their goals than did parents in the control sample. The results suggest that an anti-poverty program that provides support for combining work and family responsibilities can have beneficial effects on the development of school-age children.

摘要

我们评估了“新希望项目”(一项采用随机分配实验设计进行测试的反贫困项目)对学龄前和学龄儿童家庭功能及发展成果的影响(样本量N = 913)。“新希望项目”为全职工作的成年人提供足以使家庭收入高于贫困线的工资补贴,以及儿童保育和医疗保险补贴。教师报告称,“新希望项目”对男孩的学业成绩、课堂行为技能、积极社交行为和问题行为产生了强烈的积极影响,对男孩自己接受高等教育的期望和职业抱负也有积极影响。但该项目对女孩没有产生相应的效果。儿童的这些成果可能是由以下因素共同导致的:与对照组家庭的孩子相比,参与“新希望项目”家庭的孩子在正规儿童保育项目和其他离家的结构化活动中花费的时间更多。与对照组样本中的父母相比,参与“新希望项目”的父母就业更多,拥有更多物质资源,报告的社会支持更多,并且在实现目标方面表现出更少的压力和更多的乐观情绪。结果表明,一个为兼顾工作和家庭责任提供支持的反贫困项目能够对学龄儿童的发展产生有益影响。

相似文献

1
Work-based antipoverty programs for parents can enhance the school performance and social behavior of children.为父母提供的基于工作的反贫困项目可以提高孩子的学业成绩和社会行为表现。
Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):318-36. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00281.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
The effects of antipoverty programs on children's cumulative level of poverty-related risk.反贫困项目对儿童与贫困相关风险累积水平的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2006 Nov;42(6):981-99. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.981.
4
Impacts on children of a policy to promote employment and reduce poverty for low-income parents: new hope after 5 years.一项促进低收入父母就业和减贫政策对儿童的影响:5年后的新希望
Dev Psychol. 2005 Nov;41(6):902-18. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.902.
5
Income poverty, poverty co-factors, and the adjustment of children in elementary school.收入贫困、贫困相关因素与小学儿童的适应情况
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:91-129. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80005-4.
6
Project Redirection: making and measuring a difference.项目转向:创造并衡量影响。
Adv Adolesc Mental Health. 1990;4:137-57.
7
Assessing the effects of a work-based antipoverty program for parents on youth's future orientation and employment experiences.评估基于工作的扶贫项目对父母的影响,以了解其对年轻人未来定位和就业经验的影响。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):113-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01544.x.
8
Parents' participation in a work-based anti-poverty program can enhance their children's future orientation: understanding pathways of influence.父母参与以工作为基础的扶贫项目可以增强他们孩子的未来取向:理解影响途径。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Jun;42(6):777-91. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9802-7. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
9
The long-term effects on children and adolescents of a policy providing work supports for low-income parents.一项为低收入父母提供工作支持的政策对儿童和青少年的长期影响。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2011 Fall;30(4):729-754. doi: 10.1002/pam.20613.
10
Developmental changes in impacts of an antipoverty experiment on low-income children's structured out-of-school time.扶贫实验对低收入儿童校外结构化时间的影响的发展变化。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Sep;49(9):1763-74. doi: 10.1037/a0030978. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Unconditional Cash Transfers for Families with Children in the U.S.: A Scoping Review.美国针对有子女家庭的无条件现金转移:一项范围综述
Rev Econ Househ. 2024 Jun;22(2):415-450. doi: 10.1007/s11150-023-09672-8. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
The Influence of Family-Based Social Assistance Programs and Parenting on Child Development: A Conceptual Framework for Research with U.S. Families in Poverty.基于家庭的社会援助项目和育儿方式对儿童发展的影响:针对美国家庭贫困状况的研究概念框架
J Fam Theory Rev. 2024 Jun;16(2):255-271. doi: 10.1111/jftr.12560. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Does adding parent education and workforce training to Head Start promote or interfere with children's development?
增加家长教育和劳动力培训到“开端计划”中是否会促进或干扰儿童的发展?
Child Dev. 2024 Nov-Dec;95(6):2102-2118. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14141. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Early childhood education and care policies in the U.S. and their impact on family violence.美国的幼儿教育与照料政策及其对家庭暴力的影响。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022 Nov;142. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106653.
5
It's All in the Family: Parents' Economic Worries and Youth's Perceptions of Financial Stress and Educational Outcomes.家庭的影响:父母的经济忧虑与青少年对经济压力和教育成果的认知。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Apr;50(4):724-738. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01393-4. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
6
Poverty, Caregiving, and HPA-Axis Activity in Early Childhood.贫困、照料与幼儿期的下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴活动
Dev Rev. 2020 Jun;56. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2020.100898. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
7
Welfare-to-work interventions and their effects on the mental and physical health of lone parents and their children.从福利到工作的干预措施及其对单亲父母及其子女身心健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 26;2(2):CD009820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009820.pub3.
8
Welfare-to-work interventions and their effects on the mental and physical health of lone parents and their children.从福利到工作的干预措施及其对单亲父母及其子女身心健康的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 20;8(8):CD009820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009820.pub2.
9
Can Targeted Intervention Mitigate Early Emotional and Behavioral Problems?: Generating Robust Evidence within Randomized Controlled Trials.靶向干预能否减轻早期情绪和行为问题?:在随机对照试验中生成有力证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2;11(6):e0156397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156397. eCollection 2016.
10
Mothering Experiences: How Single Parenthood and Employment Structure the Emotional Valence of Parenting.育儿经历:单亲家庭与就业如何塑造育儿的情感倾向
Demography. 2016 Jun;53(3):649-74. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0474-x.