Suppr超能文献

高剂量吸入布地奈德治疗儿童急性哮喘发作的疗效

The effectiveness of high-dose inhaled budesonide therapy in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in children.

作者信息

Nuhoğlu Y, Bahçeciler N N, Barlan I B, Müjdat Başaran M

机构信息

Marmara University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Mar;86(3):318-22. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63306-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend the use of systemic steroids for the treatment of acute asthma attack if it has not been resolved within 24 to 36 hours of home management with regular beta2 mimetic inhalation. Such therapy for infrequent exacerbations is unlikely to have serious systemic effects. Unfortunately, many patients receiving frequent courses are potentially at risk for corticosteroid-induced side effects such as adrenal suppression, depression of linear growth, and osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE

To decrease the use of frequent oral corticosteroid courses in children, this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose inhaled steroids in comparison with oral steroids, in the therapy of acute asthma exacerbations in children.

METHODS

Sixty children who have experienced an acute exacerbation of asthma unresponsive to home management with regular use of inhaled beta2 mimetics, yet not severe enough to hospitalize, were randomized to be treated with either high-dose inhaled budesonide (1,600 microg daily) or oral methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg daily) plus medium-dose inhaled budesonide (800 microg daily, both in addition to inhaled terbutaline, 2,000 microg daily). Pre- and posttreatment pulmonary index scores, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC and forced expiratory flow 25% to 75% (FEF25%-75%) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean number of decrease in pulmonary index score was 2.61 +/- 1.12 in the high-dose budesonide-receiving group (group I) and 1.90 +/- 1.08 in the oral steroid-receiving group (group II). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups, in favor of group I (P = .038). No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups with respect to the increase in lung function test measurements (FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25%-75%; P = .790, .959, .819, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term high-dose budesonide therapy can be considered an alternative for children who are experiencing an acute asthma attack that is unresponsive to home management with regular use of an inhaled beta2 mimetic, yet who are not severe enough to hospitalize.

摘要

背景

国际指南建议,如果在家中使用常规β2激动剂吸入治疗24至36小时后急性哮喘发作仍未缓解,则应使用全身性类固醇进行治疗。这种用于不频繁发作的治疗不太可能产生严重的全身影响。不幸的是,许多接受频繁疗程治疗的患者可能面临皮质类固醇诱导的副作用风险,如肾上腺抑制、线性生长抑制和骨质疏松症。

目的

为了减少儿童频繁口服皮质类固醇疗程的使用,本研究旨在评估高剂量吸入类固醇与口服类固醇相比,在治疗儿童急性哮喘发作中的疗效。

方法

60名经历过急性哮喘发作且对在家中常规使用吸入β2激动剂治疗无反应但病情又不足以住院的儿童,被随机分为两组,分别接受高剂量吸入布地奈德(每日1600微克)或口服甲泼尼龙(每日1毫克/千克)加中剂量吸入布地奈德(每日800微克,两组均加用每日2000微克吸入特布他林)治疗。评估治疗前后的肺指数评分、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、FEV1/FVC以及25%至75%用力呼气流量(FEF25%-75%)。

结果

接受高剂量布地奈德治疗的组(I组)肺指数评分平均下降值为2.61±1.12,接受口服类固醇治疗的组(II组)为1.90±1.08。两组之间存在统计学显著差异,I组更优(P = 0.038)。两组在肺功能测试指标(FEV1、FEV1/FVC、FEF25%-75%)的增加方面未检测到统计学显著差异(P分别为0.790、0.959、0.819)。

结论

对于经历急性哮喘发作且对在家中常规使用吸入β2激动剂治疗无反应但病情又不足以住院的儿童,短期高剂量布地奈德治疗可被视为一种替代治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验