de Minzi M C, Sacchi C
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científícas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Psychol Rep. 2001 Feb;88(1):115-22. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.1.115.
The aim of this work was to examine how the presence of inapplicable items might change the factor structure of the 1984 Ways of Coping Questionnaire by Lazarus and Folkman. The Spanish version of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire was administered to 156 subjects with university degrees. The 95 women and 61 men whose ages were from 18 and 45 years (M = 27.8, SD = 12.1) were of middle socioeconomic status. All were residents of Buenos Aires. To study whether relevant items modify the factor structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire, two factor analyses were carried out, one with items rated as not relevant (Item Mean) and the other with the same items rated as not chosen. In both factor analyses, principal axes method and oblimin rotation were performed, and five factors were considered. Congruence indexes were performed. Analysis showed that not choosing an item because it does not coincide with one's behavior or ideas is not the same as not selecting that item because it does not apply to the current threatening situation. Lack of discrimination between situations when analyzing data leads to a distorted interpretation of the way in which the subject actually behaves or copes with the situation.
这项工作的目的是研究不适用项目的存在如何改变拉扎勒斯和福克曼1984年的应对方式问卷的因子结构。应对方式问卷的西班牙语版本被施测于156名拥有大学学位的受试者。95名女性和61名男性,年龄在18至45岁之间(M = 27.8,SD = 12.1),社会经济地位处于中等。他们均为布宜诺斯艾利斯的居民。为研究相关项目是否会改变应对方式问卷的因子结构,进行了两项因子分析,一项是对被评定为不相关的项目(项目均值)进行分析,另一项是对被评定为未被选中的相同项目进行分析。在两项因子分析中,均采用主成分分析法和斜交旋转法,并考虑五个因子。进行了一致性指数分析。分析表明,因项目与自身行为或想法不符而不选择该项目,与因项目不适用于当前威胁情境而不选择该项目是不同的。在分析数据时缺乏对不同情境的区分会导致对受试者实际行为或应对情境方式的扭曲解读。