Iavicoli S, Marinaccio A, Vonesch N, Ursini C L, Grandi C, Palmi S
ISPESL National Institute for Occupational Safety and Prevention, Department of Occupational Health, Via Fontana Candida, 1 00040 Monteporzio Catone, Roma, Italy.
Occup Environ Med. 2001 May;58(5):325-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.5.325.
To find a broad consensus on research priorities and strategies in the field of occupational health and safety in Italy.
A two phase questionnaire survey was based on the Delphi technique previously described in other reports. 310 Occupational safety and health specialists (from universities and local health units) were given an open questionnaire (to identify three priority research areas). The data obtained from respondents (175, 56.4%) were then used to draw up a list of 27 priority topics grouped together into five macrosectors. Each of these was given a score ranging from 1 (of little importance) to 5 (extremely important). With the mean scores obtained from a total of 203 respondents (65.4%), it was possible to place the 27 topics in rank order according to a scale of priorities.
Among the macrosectors, first place was given to the question of methodological approach to research in this field, and for individual topics, occupational carcinogenesis and quality in occupational medicine were ranked first and second, respectively. The question of exposure to low doses of environmental pollutants and multiple exposures ranked third among the priorities; the development of adequate and effective approaches and methods for worker education and participation in prevention was also perceived as being an important issue (fourth place).
This study (the first of its kind in Italy) enabled us to achieve an adequate degree of consensus on research priorities related to the protection of occupational health and safety. Disparities in the mean scores of some of the issues identified overall as being research priorities, seem to be linked both to geographical area and to whether respondents worked in local health units or universities. This finding requires debate and further analysis.
就意大利职业健康与安全领域的研究重点和策略达成广泛共识。
基于先前其他报告中描述的德尔菲技术进行了两阶段问卷调查。向310名职业安全与健康专家(来自大学和地方卫生单位)发放了开放式问卷(以确定三个优先研究领域)。然后,将从175名受访者(56.4%)那里获得的数据用于制定一份包含27个优先主题的清单,这些主题被归为五个宏观领域。每个主题都被赋予一个从1分(不太重要)到5分(极其重要)的分数。根据从总共203名受访者(65.4%)那里获得的平均分数,有可能按照优先顺序对这27个主题进行排名。
在宏观领域中,该领域研究方法的问题位居榜首,就单个主题而言,职业致癌作用和职业医学质量分别排名第一和第二。低剂量环境污染物暴露和多重暴露问题在优先事项中排名第三;制定适当且有效的工人教育方法以及让工人参与预防也被视为一个重要问题(排名第四)。
这项研究(意大利首次开展此类研究)使我们能够就与职业健康与安全保护相关的研究重点达成足够程度的共识。总体上被确定为研究重点的一些问题的平均分数差异,似乎既与地理区域有关,也与受访者是在地方卫生单位还是大学工作有关。这一发现需要进行辩论和进一步分析。