Suppr超能文献

欧洲国家职业安全与健康研究所的研究人员对推动欧洲研究议程的看法:一项改进的德尔菲研究。

The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study.

作者信息

Gagliardi Diana, Rondinone Bruna M, Mirabile Marco, Buresti Giuliana, Ellwood Peter, Hery Michel, Paszkiewicz Peter, Valenti Antonio, Iavicoli Sergio

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, National Institute for the Insurance against Work Accidents (INAIL), Monteporzio Catone, Italy.

Foresight Centre, Health and Safety Executive, Buxton, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e015336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points of view of European occupational safety and health (OSH) researchers.The objective is to identify priorities for OSH research that may contribute to the achievement of present and future sustainable growth objectives set by the European strategies.

METHODS

The study was carried out using a modified Delphi method with a two-round survey. Each round involved a panel of about 110 researchers representing the network member institutes was selected according to specific criteria, including the ownership of research expertise in at least one of the four macroareas identified by the reference report developed by EU-OSHA in 2013.

RESULTS

The study identified some innovative research topics (for example, 'Emerging technological devices' and 'OSH consequences of markets integration') and research priorities (ie, crowdsourcing, e-work, zero-hours contract) that are not reflected in previous studies of this nature.The absence of any reference to violence and harassment at work among the researchers' proposals is a major difference from previous similar studies, while topics related to gender issues and electromagnetic fields show a lower importance.

CONCLUSIONS

The innovative design of a research priorities identification process, which takes advantage of a large, representative and qualified panel of European researchers allowed the definition of a number of research priorities able to support the inclusion of innovative OSH research issues in the scope of the next European research agenda.

摘要

目标

本研究是在欧洲职业安全与健康研究合作组织联合研究活动框架内开展的,基于2013年欧洲工作安全与健康局(欧盟职业安全与健康局)研究所设计的框架,是首个运用欧洲职业安全与健康(OSH)研究人员观点的实例。其目的是确定职业安全与健康研究的优先事项,这些事项可能有助于实现欧洲战略设定的当前和未来可持续增长目标。

方法

该研究采用了经过改进的德尔菲法,进行两轮调查。每一轮都有一个由约110名研究人员组成的小组参与,这些研究人员代表网络成员机构,是根据特定标准挑选出来的,包括在欧盟职业安全与健康局2013年编写的参考报告确定的四个宏观领域中至少一个领域拥有研究专长。

结果

该研究确定了一些创新研究主题(例如,“新兴技术设备”和“市场整合的职业安全与健康后果”)以及研究优先事项(即众包、电子工作、零时工合同),这些在以往此类性质的研究中并未体现。研究人员的提议中未提及工作场所的暴力和骚扰,这与以往类似研究存在重大差异,而与性别问题和电磁场相关的主题重要性较低。

结论

研究优先事项识别过程的创新设计利用了大量具有代表性且资质合格的欧洲研究人员小组,从而能够确定一些研究优先事项,有助于将创新的职业安全与健康研究问题纳入下一个欧洲研究议程的范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/5734473/be050318b073/bmjopen-2016-015336f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验