• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲国家职业安全与健康研究所的研究人员对推动欧洲研究议程的看法:一项改进的德尔菲研究。

The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study.

作者信息

Gagliardi Diana, Rondinone Bruna M, Mirabile Marco, Buresti Giuliana, Ellwood Peter, Hery Michel, Paszkiewicz Peter, Valenti Antonio, Iavicoli Sergio

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, National Institute for the Insurance against Work Accidents (INAIL), Monteporzio Catone, Italy.

Foresight Centre, Health and Safety Executive, Buxton, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e015336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336
PMID:28645965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5734473/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study, developed within the frame of the Partnership for European Research on Occupational Safety and Health joint research activities and based on the frame designed by the 2013 European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) study, is the first example of using the points of view of European occupational safety and health (OSH) researchers.The objective is to identify priorities for OSH research that may contribute to the achievement of present and future sustainable growth objectives set by the European strategies.

METHODS

The study was carried out using a modified Delphi method with a two-round survey. Each round involved a panel of about 110 researchers representing the network member institutes was selected according to specific criteria, including the ownership of research expertise in at least one of the four macroareas identified by the reference report developed by EU-OSHA in 2013.

RESULTS

The study identified some innovative research topics (for example, 'Emerging technological devices' and 'OSH consequences of markets integration') and research priorities (ie, crowdsourcing, e-work, zero-hours contract) that are not reflected in previous studies of this nature.The absence of any reference to violence and harassment at work among the researchers' proposals is a major difference from previous similar studies, while topics related to gender issues and electromagnetic fields show a lower importance.

CONCLUSIONS

The innovative design of a research priorities identification process, which takes advantage of a large, representative and qualified panel of European researchers allowed the definition of a number of research priorities able to support the inclusion of innovative OSH research issues in the scope of the next European research agenda.

摘要

目标

本研究是在欧洲职业安全与健康研究合作组织联合研究活动框架内开展的,基于2013年欧洲工作安全与健康局(欧盟职业安全与健康局)研究所设计的框架,是首个运用欧洲职业安全与健康(OSH)研究人员观点的实例。其目的是确定职业安全与健康研究的优先事项,这些事项可能有助于实现欧洲战略设定的当前和未来可持续增长目标。

方法

该研究采用了经过改进的德尔菲法,进行两轮调查。每一轮都有一个由约110名研究人员组成的小组参与,这些研究人员代表网络成员机构,是根据特定标准挑选出来的,包括在欧盟职业安全与健康局2013年编写的参考报告确定的四个宏观领域中至少一个领域拥有研究专长。

结果

该研究确定了一些创新研究主题(例如,“新兴技术设备”和“市场整合的职业安全与健康后果”)以及研究优先事项(即众包、电子工作、零时工合同),这些在以往此类性质的研究中并未体现。研究人员的提议中未提及工作场所的暴力和骚扰,这与以往类似研究存在重大差异,而与性别问题和电磁场相关的主题重要性较低。

结论

研究优先事项识别过程的创新设计利用了大量具有代表性且资质合格的欧洲研究人员小组,从而能够确定一些研究优先事项,有助于将创新的职业安全与健康研究问题纳入下一个欧洲研究议程的范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/5734473/be050318b073/bmjopen-2016-015336f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/5734473/be050318b073/bmjopen-2016-015336f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a5/5734473/be050318b073/bmjopen-2016-015336f01.jpg

相似文献

1
The perspective of European researchers of national occupational safety and health institutes for contributing to a European research agenda: a modified Delphi study.欧洲国家职业安全与健康研究所的研究人员对推动欧洲研究议程的看法:一项改进的德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e015336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015336.
2
Trends and priorities in occupational health research and knowledge transfer in Italy.意大利职业健康研究和知识转移的趋势与重点。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010 Jun;36(4):339-48. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2892. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
3
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
4
Understanding occupational safety and health surveillance: expert consensus on components, attributes and example measures for an evaluation framework.理解职业安全与健康监测:关于评估框架的组成部分、属性及示例措施的专家共识
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12895-6.
5
A national research agenda for pre-hospital emergency medical services in the Netherlands: a Delphi-study.荷兰院前紧急医疗服务的国家研究议程:一项德尔菲研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jan 8;24:2. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0195-y.
6
Developing a Health Services Research Agenda in Nurse Anesthesia Using a Modified Delphi Method.运用改良德尔菲法制定麻醉护理中的卫生服务研究议程。
AANA J. 2016 Aug;84(4):234-8.
7
Research priorities in occupational safety and health: a review.职业安全与健康领域的研究重点:综述
Ind Health. 2006 Jan;44(1):169-78. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.44.169.
8
Priorities in occupational health research: a Delphi study in The Netherlands.职业健康研究的优先事项:荷兰的一项德尔菲研究。
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jul;54(7):504-10. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.7.504.
9
Current research priorities for UK occupational physicians and occupational health researchers: a modified Delphi study.英国职业医师和职业健康研究人员的当前研究重点:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Nov;75(11):830-836. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105114. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
10
[European perspectives on occupational safety and health: Stimulations for ergonomics].[欧洲对职业安全与健康的观点:对人体工程学的激励]
Z Arbeitswiss. 2021;75(2):162-167. doi: 10.1007/s41449-021-00251-0. Epub 2021 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a professional competency framework for general practitioners in tertiary hospitals in China: a modified Delphi study.构建中国三级医院全科医生专业能力框架:一项改良德尔菲研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 4;15(3):e082736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082736.
2
Development of family resource indicators for people with schizophrenic disorder in community by modified Delphi method in Beijing, China.中国北京采用改良 Delphi 法为社区精神分裂症患者制定家庭资源指标。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 7;14(5):e076838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076838.
3
Partnership for European Research in Occupational Safety and Health (PEROSH) - Celebrating 20 years of collaboration.

本文引用的文献

1
The new EU occupational safety and health strategic framework 2014-2020: objectives and challenges.2014 - 2020年欧盟新的职业安全与健康战略框架:目标与挑战
Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Apr;66(3):180-2. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw010.
2
A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice.健康研究优先事项设定清单:九条良好实践的常见主题。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Dec 15;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-36.
3
Priority setting and health policy and systems research.优先事项设定与卫生政策和体系研究。
欧洲职业安全与健康研究合作组织(PEROSH)——庆祝合作20周年。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Sep 1;49(6):363-365. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4110. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
Health research priorities for wildland firefighters: a modified Delphi study with stakeholder interviews.荒野消防员健康研究重点:一项结合利益相关者访谈的改良德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 3;12(2):e051227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051227.
5
Development of a competency model for general practitioners after standardized residency training in China by a modified Delphi method.运用改良 Delphi 法构建我国规范化住院医师培训后全科医生胜任力模型
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Aug 26;22(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01508-7.
6
Contribution of ICOH to Address the Different OSH Needs among Countries: Results of a Survey.ICOH 在满足不同国家职业健康需求方面的贡献:一项调查结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4665. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094665.
7
Exploring prevention and mitigation strategies to reduce the health impacts of occupational exposure to wildfires for wildland firefighters and related personnel: protocol of a scoping study.探索预防和缓解策略,以减少野外消防员和相关人员职业暴露于野火对健康的影响:范围研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 May 29;9(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01381-y.
8
Current research priorities for UK occupational physicians and occupational health researchers: a modified Delphi study.英国职业医师和职业健康研究人员的当前研究重点:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Nov;75(11):830-836. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105114. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2009 Dec 4;7:27. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-27.
4
Research priorities in occupational safety and health: a review.职业安全与健康领域的研究重点:综述
Ind Health. 2006 Jan;44(1):169-78. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.44.169.
5
Occupational health research priorities in Malaysia: a Delphi study.马来西亚的职业健康研究重点:一项德尔菲研究。
Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jul;58(7):426-31. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.7.426.
6
Research priorities in occupational health in Italy.意大利职业健康领域的研究重点。
Occup Environ Med. 2001 May;58(5):325-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.5.325.
7
Research challenges arising from changes in worklife.工作生活变化带来的研究挑战。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Dec;25(6):473-83. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.469.
8
The National Occupational Research Agenda: a model of broad stakeholder input into priority setting.《国家职业研究议程:广泛利益相关者参与确定优先事项的模式》
Am J Public Health. 1998 Mar;88(3):353-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.353.
9
Priorities in occupational health research: a Delphi study in The Netherlands.职业健康研究的优先事项:荷兰的一项德尔菲研究。
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jul;54(7):504-10. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.7.504.
10
Research priorities in occupational medicine: a survey of United Kingdom personnel managers.职业医学的研究重点:对英国人事经理的一项调查
Occup Environ Med. 1996 Sep;53(9):642-4. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.9.642.