Chan I S, Zhang Z
Clinical Biostatistics, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA.
Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):1202-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.01202.x.
Confidence intervals are often provided to estimate a treatment difference. When the sample size is small, as is typical in early phases of clinical trials, confidence intervals based on large sample approximations may not be reliable. In this report, we propose test-based methods of constructing exact confidence intervals for the difference in two binomial proportions. These exact confidence intervals are obtained from the unconditional distribution of two binomial responses, and they guarantee the level of coverage. We compare the performance of these confidence intervals to ones based on the observed difference alone. We show that a large improvement can be achieved by using the standardized Z test with a constrained maximum likelihood estimate of the variance.
通常会提供置信区间来估计治疗差异。当样本量较小时,如在临床试验的早期阶段很常见,基于大样本近似的置信区间可能不可靠。在本报告中,我们提出了基于检验的方法来构建两个二项比例差异的精确置信区间。这些精确置信区间是从两个二项反应的无条件分布中获得的,并且它们保证了覆盖水平。我们将这些置信区间的性能与仅基于观察到的差异的置信区间进行比较。我们表明,通过使用具有方差的约束最大似然估计的标准化Z检验,可以实现很大的改进。