Suppr超能文献

用于检测儿童呼吸道病毒的六重检测法评估

Evaluation of the Hexaplex assay for detection of respiratory viruses in children.

作者信息

Kehl S C, Henrickson K J, Hua W, Fan J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1696-701. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1696-1701.2001.

Abstract

The Hexaplex assay (Prodesse, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.) is a multiplex reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR assay for the detection of parainfluenza virus types 1, 2, and 3, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) types A and B, and influenza virus types A and B. We evaluated the Hexaplex assay in comparison with conventional viral cell cultures and rapid enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for RSV (Directigen; Becton Dickinson Inc., Cockeysville, Md.) and influenza A virus (Abbott Test Pack; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill.) for the detection of respiratory viruses from pediatric respiratory specimens obtained from children seen at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin from December 1997 through May 1998. A total of 363 respiratory specimens were evaluated. The tissue culture prevalence of parainfluenza virus during this period of time was low (1.1%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of Hexaplex compared to tissue culture for the detection of parainfluenza virus were 100, 95.8, 19.0, and 100%, respectively. Only one specimen was determined to contain influenza B virus by Hexaplex; it was tissue culture negative. A specimen was considered to contain RSV or influenza A virus when it was either culture positive or culture negative but Hexaplex and EIA positive. Prior to the analysis of discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of RSV were 91.2, 100, 100, and 98.0%, respectively, for tissue culture; 84.5, 100, 100, and 96.6% for EIA; and 98.5, 91.5, 72.8, and 99.6% for Hexaplex, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of influenza A virus prior to the analysis of discrepant results were 100, 100, 100, and 100%, respectively, for culture, 78.0, 100, 100, and 89.4% for EIA, respectively, and 95.1, 94.1, 67.2, and 99.3% for Hexaplex, respectively. Culture- and/or EIA-negative, Hexaplex-positive specimens were analyzed by a second RT-PCR assay which used primers specific for a different genomic region than that used in the Hexaplex assay. After analysis of these discrepant results, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of RSV were 74.3, 100, 100, and 93.5%, respectively, for tissue culture; 70.3, 100, 100, and 92.5% for EIA; and 98.6, 97.4, 91.2, and 99.6% for Hexaplex. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for the detection of influenza A virus were 83.3, 100, 100, and 97.4%, respectively, for tissue culture; 69.4, 100, 100, and 83.3% for EIA; and 95.8, 98.7, 92.0, and 99.3% for Hexaplex. Hexaplex is a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the detection of the seven most common respiratory viruses in children.

摘要

六联检检测法(Prodesse公司,威斯康星州密尔沃基)是一种多重逆转录酶(RT)-PCR检测法,用于检测1、2和3型副流感病毒、A和B型呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)以及A和B型流感病毒。我们将六联检检测法与传统病毒细胞培养法以及用于检测RSV(Directigen;Becton Dickinson公司,马里兰州科基斯维尔)和甲型流感病毒(Abbott Test Pack;雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州雅培公园)的快速酶免疫测定法(EIA)进行了比较,以检测1997年12月至1998年5月在威斯康星儿童医院就诊儿童的儿科呼吸道标本中的呼吸道病毒。共评估了363份呼吸道标本。在此期间,副流感病毒的组织培养流行率较低(1.1%)。与组织培养相比,六联检检测法检测副流感病毒的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%、95.8%、19.0%和100%。六联检检测法仅确定一份标本含有乙型流感病毒;该标本组织培养为阴性。当标本培养阳性或培养阴性但六联检检测法和EIA检测法为阳性时,则认为该标本含有RSV或甲型流感病毒。在分析不一致结果之前,组织培养检测RSV的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为91.2%、100%、100%和98.0%;EIA检测法分别为84.5%、100%、100%和96.6%;六联检检测法分别为98.5%、91.5%、72.8%和99.6%。在分析不一致结果之前,培养检测甲型流感病毒的敏感性、特异性分别为100%、100%、100%和100%,EIA检测法分别为78.0%、100%、100%和89.4%,六联检检测法分别为95.1%、94.1%、67.2%和99.3%。培养和/或EIA检测为阴性、六联检检测法为阳性的标本通过第二种RT-PCR检测法进行分析,该检测法使用的引物与六联检检测法中使用的引物针对不同的基因组区域。在分析这些不一致结果之后,组织培养检测RSV的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为74.3%、100%、100%和93.用EIA检测时分别为70.3%、100%、100%和92.5%;用六联检检测法时分别为98.6%、97.4%、91.2%和99.6%。组织培养检测甲型流感病毒的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为83.3%、100%、100%和97.4%;EIA检测法分别为69.4%、100%、100%和83.3%;六联检检测法分别为95.8%、98.用六联检检测法检测儿童中七种最常见的呼吸道病毒是一种快速、敏感且特异的方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
[Respiratory viruses: old and new. Review of diagnostic methods].[呼吸道病毒:新旧病毒。诊断方法综述]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2007 Oct;25:60-65. doi: 10.1157/13111839. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
4
Influenza and other respiratory viruses in children: prevalence and clinical features.儿童中的流感和其他呼吸道病毒:流行情况和临床特征。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;41(12):1445-1449. doi: 10.1007/s10096-022-04515-3. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Viral pneumonia in children.儿童病毒性肺炎
Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;9(3):217-233. doi: 10.1016/S1045-1870(98)80035-6. Epub 2006 Jun 3.
3
Discrepant analysis: how can we test a test?差异分析:我们如何检验一项检测?
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Jun;38(6):2027-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.6.2027-2029.2000.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验