Strachan D P
Department of Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Br Med Bull. 2000;56(4):865-82. doi: 10.1258/0007142001903562.
Although the everyday experience of asthmatic patients provides ample anecdotal evidence that environmental exposures provoke bronchospasm, it has proved more difficult to assess the impact of air quality on the timing of asthma attacks and the prevalence of asthma in populations. Spectacular 'asthma epidemic days' are sometimes attributable to exceptional outdoor aero-allergen exposures. By comparison, effects of inorganic particles and gaseous pollutants in outdoor air on the incidence of asthma attacks are subtle and poorly quantified. Environmental tobacco smoke and mould growth are the indoor factors most consistently associated with respiratory morbidity, but their roles in initiating allergic asthma remain uncertain. Evidence relating asthma risk to fumes from gas cooking, and to allergens from dust mites and household pets remains confused and controversial. It is unlikely that trends in either outdoor or indoor air pollution have contributed substantially to the rise in prevalence of asthma and allergic disease in recent decades.
尽管哮喘患者的日常经历提供了大量轶事证据,表明环境暴露会引发支气管痉挛,但事实证明,评估空气质量对哮喘发作时间和人群中哮喘患病率的影响更加困难。壮观的“哮喘流行日”有时可归因于特殊的室外空气过敏原暴露。相比之下,室外空气中的无机颗粒和气态污染物对哮喘发作发生率的影响很细微,且量化程度很低。环境烟草烟雾和霉菌生长是与呼吸道疾病最密切相关的室内因素,但其在引发过敏性哮喘中的作用仍不确定。将哮喘风险与燃气烹饪产生的烟雾、尘螨和家养宠物产生的过敏原联系起来的证据仍然混乱且存在争议。近几十年来,室外或室内空气污染的趋势不太可能对哮喘和过敏性疾病患病率的上升有很大影响。