Blustein J
Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, NY, USA.
J Urban Health. 2001 Mar;78(1):7-20. doi: 10.1093/jurban/78.1.7.
Urban bioethics has two goals. First, it aims to focus attention on neglected bioethical problems that have particular salience in urban settings. Three problems are highlighted: socioeconomic inequality as a major determinant of health inequality, the foundations of an ethic for public health, and the impact of social context on the therapeutic alliance between patients and physicians. Second, urban bioethics serves as a vehicle for raising deep theoretical and methodological questions about the dominant assumptions and approaches of contemporary bioethics. Demands for cultural sensitivity, so pronounced in the urban context, compel us to reexamine the central commitment in bioethics to personal autonomy. The multiculturalism of urban life also argues for a dialogic approach to bioethical problem solving rather than the monologic approach that characterizes most bioethical thinking. Although my brief for redirecting bioethics will resonate with many critics who do not consider themselves urban bioethicists, I argue that there are special advantages in using urban bioethics to expose the limitations of contemporary bioethical paradigms.
城市生物伦理学有两个目标。其一,它旨在将注意力集中于在城市环境中具有特殊显著性的被忽视的生物伦理问题。突出了三个问题:社会经济不平等作为健康不平等的主要决定因素、公共卫生伦理的基础以及社会背景对医患治疗联盟的影响。其二,城市生物伦理学作为一个载体,引发关于当代生物伦理学的主导假设和方法的深刻理论和方法论问题。在城市环境中如此明显的对文化敏感性的要求,迫使我们重新审视生物伦理学对个人自主性的核心承诺。城市生活的多元文化主义也主张采用对话方式来解决生物伦理问题,而非大多数生物伦理思维所特有的独白方式。尽管我关于重新引导生物伦理学的简述会引起许多不认为自己是城市生物伦理学家的批评者的共鸣,但我认为利用城市生物伦理学来揭示当代生物伦理范式的局限性具有特殊优势。