Enting R H, van der Rijt C C, Wilms E B, Lieverse P J, de Wit R, Smitt P A
Afd. Neuro-oncologie, Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam-Daniel den Hoed Kliniek, Postbus 5201, 3008 AE Rotterdam.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001 May 19;145(20):950-4.
The World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief have been proven efficacious in 90% of the patients with cancer pain. The patient's self-report of pain is the focus of treatment. When initiating treatment, controlled-release preparations of opioids are generally favoured, and are combined with immediate release morphine to prevent or treat 'breakthrough' pain and to enable the optimum opioid dosage to be calculated. (Breakthrough pain is a transient increase in pain in a patient who has stable, persistent pain treated with opioids.) In patients with an unfavourable balance between analgesia and side effects, the following strategies may be useful, together with appropriate treatment of the side effects: Sequential opioid trials (so-called opioid rotation) is an approach which is effective in 50-70% of the patients. Changing the route of opioid administration is successful in 70-95% of the patients. When selecting an invasive technique, continuous subcutaneous infusion is medically preferred. Spinal analgesia is an alternative. Knowledge of the relative potency of opioid drugs and of their biologic availability is needed to guide changes in drugs or routes of administration.
世界卫生组织的癌症疼痛缓解指南已被证明对90%的癌症疼痛患者有效。患者对疼痛的自我报告是治疗的重点。开始治疗时,通常倾向于使用阿片类药物的控释制剂,并与即释吗啡联合使用,以预防或治疗“爆发性”疼痛,并计算出最佳阿片类药物剂量。(爆发性疼痛是指在用阿片类药物治疗稳定、持续性疼痛的患者中,疼痛出现短暂增加。)对于镇痛与副作用之间平衡不佳的患者,以下策略可能有用,同时要对副作用进行适当治疗:序贯阿片类药物试验(所谓的阿片类药物轮换)对50%-70%的患者有效。改变阿片类药物的给药途径在70%-95%的患者中取得成功。选择侵入性技术时,医学上首选持续皮下输注。脊髓镇痛是一种替代方法。需要了解阿片类药物的相对效价及其生物利用度,以指导药物或给药途径的改变。