Suppr超能文献

初次正畸咨询时信息留存情况的比较。

A comparison of information retention at an initial orthodontic consultation.

作者信息

Thomson A M, Cunningham S J, Hunt N P

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Eastman Dental Institute for Oral Health Care Sciences, University College London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2001 Apr;23(2):169-78. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.2.169.

Abstract

The exchange of information is an everyday part of orthodontic treatment. However, the amount of information that is understood and retained, by patients and their parents, is not known. There has been very little research in the area of information retention in dentistry. This has implications with the demands for improved provision of information for patients. This questionnaire-based study, compared the effectiveness of written, verbal, and visual methods of providing orthodontic information. It assessed the retention of this information, by patients and parents, in both the short- and long-term. Twenty-eight patients and their parents, were allocated alternately into one of three groups, receiving written, verbal, or visual information. Short-term retention of knowledge was assessed 10-15 minutes after receiving the information and long-term retention rated by a second questionnaire mailed 8 weeks later. Overall, little difference was found between the three methods. The findings suggested that verbal information should not be given to patients unless supplemented by written and/or visual information, and that parents were more attentive to verbal instructions than their children.

摘要

信息交流是正畸治疗日常工作的一部分。然而,患者及其父母理解并记住的信息量尚不清楚。牙科领域关于信息留存的研究非常少。这对改善向患者提供信息的要求有影响。这项基于问卷的研究比较了提供正畸信息的书面、口头和视觉方法的有效性。它评估了患者及其父母在短期和长期内对这些信息的留存情况。28名患者及其父母被交替分配到三组中的一组,分别接受书面、口头或视觉信息。在收到信息10 - 15分钟后评估知识的短期留存情况,并在8周后通过邮寄第二份问卷来评估长期留存情况。总体而言,三种方法之间差异不大。研究结果表明,除非辅以书面和/或视觉信息,否则不应向患者提供口头信息,而且父母比孩子更留意口头指示。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验