• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同站立宽度下深蹲的三维生物力学分析。

A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths.

作者信息

Escamilla R F, Fleisig G S, Lowry T M, Barrentine S W, Andrews J R

机构信息

Michael W. Krzyzewski Human Performance Laboratory, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6):984-98. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00019.

DOI:10.1097/00005768-200106000-00019
PMID:11404665
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to quantify biomechanical parameters employing two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) analyses while performing the squat with varying stance widths.

METHODS

Two 60-Hz cameras recorded 39 lifters during a national powerlifting championship. Stance width was normalized by shoulder width (SW), and three stance groups were defined: 1) narrow stance squat (NS), 107 +/- 10% SW; 2) medium stance squat (MS), 142 +/- 12% SW; and 3) wide stance squat (WS), 169 +/- 12% SW.

RESULTS

Most biomechanical differences among the three stance groups and between 2-D and 3-D analyses occurred between the NS and WS. Compared with the NS at 45 degrees and 90 degrees knee flexion angle (KF), the hips flexed 6-11 degrees more and the thighs were 7-12 degrees more horizontal during the MS and WS. Compared with the NS at 90 degrees and maximum KF, the shanks were 5-9 degrees more vertical and the feet were turned out 6 degrees more during the WS. No significant differences occurred in trunk positions. Hip and thigh angles were 3-13 degrees less in 2-D compared with 3-D analyses. Ankle plantar flexor (10-51 N.m), knee extensor (359-573 N.m), and hip extensor (275-577 N.m) net muscle moments were generated for the NS, whereas ankle dorsiflexor (34-284 N.m), knee extensor (447-756 N.m), and hip extensor (382-628 N.m) net muscle moments were generated for the MS and WS. Significant differences in ankle and knee moment arms between 2-D and 3-D analyses were 7-9 cm during the NS, 12-14 cm during the MS, and 16-18 cm during the WS.

CONCLUSIONS

Ankle plantar flexor net muscle moments were generated during the NS, ankle dorsiflexor net muscle moments were produced during the MS and WS, and knee and hip moments were greater during the WS compared with the NS. A 3-D biomechanical analysis of the squat is more accurate than a 2-D biomechanical analysis, especially during the WS.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是在进行不同站立宽度的深蹲时,采用二维(2-D)和三维(3-D)分析来量化生物力学参数。

方法

在一次全国力量举锦标赛期间,两台60赫兹的摄像机记录了39名举重运动员的情况。站立宽度通过肩宽(SW)进行标准化,并定义了三个站立组:1)窄站距深蹲(NS),107±10%SW;2)中站距深蹲(MS),142±12%SW;3)宽站距深蹲(WS),169±12%SW。

结果

三个站立组之间以及二维和三维分析之间的大多数生物力学差异出现在NS和WS之间。在45度和90度膝关节屈曲角度(KF)时,与NS相比,MS和WS期间髋关节多屈曲6 - 11度,大腿多水平7 - 12度。在90度和最大KF时,与NS相比,WS期间小腿多垂直5 - 9度,双脚外旋多6度。躯干位置没有显著差异。与三维分析相比,二维分析中的髋关节和大腿角度小3 - 13度。NS期间,踝关节跖屈肌(10 - 51 N·m)、膝关节伸肌(359 - 573 N·m)和髋关节伸肌(275 - 577 N·m)产生净肌肉力矩,而MS和WS期间,踝关节背屈肌(34 - 284 N·m)、膝关节伸肌(447 - 756 N·m)和髋关节伸肌(382 - 628 N·m)产生净肌肉力矩。二维和三维分析之间,踝关节和膝关节力臂的显著差异在NS期间为7 - 9厘米,MS期间为12 - 14厘米,WS期间为16 - 18厘米。

结论

NS期间产生踝关节跖屈肌净肌肉力矩,MS和WS期间产生踝关节背屈肌净肌肉力矩,与NS相比,WS期间膝关节和髋关节力矩更大。深蹲的三维生物力学分析比二维生物力学分析更准确,尤其是在WS期间。

相似文献

1
A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths.不同站立宽度下深蹲的三维生物力学分析。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jun;33(6):984-98. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00019.
2
A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts.相扑式硬拉与传统式硬拉的三维生物力学分析
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Jul;32(7):1265-75. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200007000-00013.
3
Effects of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press.深蹲和腿举过程中技术变化对膝关节生物力学的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Sep;33(9):1552-66. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200109000-00020.
4
Biomechanical analysis of the deadlift during the 1999 Special Olympics World Games.1999年特殊奥林匹克运动会世界运动会期间硬拉的生物力学分析。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Aug;33(8):1345-53. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00016.
5
Effect of squat depth and barbell load on relative muscular effort in squatting.深蹲深度和杠铃负荷对深蹲中相对肌肉用力的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Oct;26(10):2820-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31826791a7.
6
Effects of barbell back squat stance width on sagittal and frontal hip and knee kinetics.杠铃深蹲站位宽度对髋关节和膝关节矢状面和额状面动力学的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Jan;29(1):44-54. doi: 10.1111/sms.13305. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
7
A biomechanical comparison of the traditional squat, powerlifting squat, and box squat.传统深蹲、力量举深蹲和箱式深蹲的生物力学比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jul;26(7):1805-16. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182577067.
8
Contributions to the understanding of gait control.对步态控制理解的贡献。
Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4823.
9
A Biomechanical Comparison Between the Safety-Squat Bar and Traditional Barbell Back Squat.安全深蹲杆与传统杠铃深蹲的生物力学比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 May 1;38(5):825-834. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004719. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
10
Kinematic analysis of the powerlifting style squat and the conventional deadlift during competition: is there a cross-over effect between lifts?竞技举重式深蹲和传统硬拉的运动学分析:举重之间是否存在交叉效应?
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2574-80. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bc1d2a.

引用本文的文献

1
The Applied Sport Science and Medicine of Powerlifting and Para Powerlifting: A Systematic Scoping Review with Recommendations for Future Research.力量举和残障力量举的应用运动科学与医学:一项系统综述及对未来研究的建议
Sports Med. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02305-3.
2
Development of a comprehensive clinical assessment protocol for low back and hip pain in powerlifters: a feasibility study.制定针对力量举运动员腰臀部疼痛的综合临床评估方案:一项可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Dec 12;10(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01579-0.
3
Impact of the deep squat on articular knee joint structures, friend or enemy? A scoping review.
深蹲对膝关节关节结构的影响:是友还是敌?一项范围综述
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Nov 19;6:1477796. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1477796. eCollection 2024.
4
Kinematic analysis of the back squat at different load intensities in powerlifters and weightlifters.力量举运动员和举重运动员在不同负荷强度下进行深蹲动作的运动学分析。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Oct 31;6:1454309. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1454309. eCollection 2024.
5
The Quality of Functional Movements and the Back Squat in Amateur and Professional Bodybuilders.业余和职业健美运动员的功能性动作质量与后深蹲
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Nov 1;19(11):1455-1464. doi: 10.26603/001c.124998. eCollection 2024.
6
Relationship among the COM Motion, the Lower Extremity and the Trunk during the Squat.深蹲过程中重心(COM)运动、下肢与躯干之间的关系。
J Hum Kinet. 2024 May 17;93:29-39. doi: 10.5114/jhk/183066. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Are Diminishing Potentiation and Large Extensor Moments the Cause for the Occurrence of the Sticking Region in Maximum Free-Weight Barbell Back Squats among Resistance-Trained Males?力量训练男性进行最大自由重量杠铃后深蹲时,力量增强减弱和较大伸展力矩是否是产生卡滞区域的原因?
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):105-119. doi: 10.5114/jhk/185720. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
The Effect of Sex and Different Repetition Maximums on Kinematics and Surface Electromyography in the Last Repetition of the Barbell Back Squat.性别和不同重复最大值对杠铃后深蹲最后一次重复时的运动学和表面肌电图的影响。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Apr 18;9(2):75. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9020075.
9
A Biomechanical Review of the Squat Exercise: Implications for Clinical Practice.深蹲运动的生物力学综述:对临床实践的启示
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):490-501. doi: 10.26603/001c.94600. eCollection 2024.
10
Passive knee exoskeletons in functional tasks: Biomechanical effects of a coil-spring on squats.功能性任务中的被动式膝关节外骨骼:螺旋弹簧对深蹲的生物力学影响
Wearable Technol. 2021 Jun 8;2:e7. doi: 10.1017/wtc.2021.6. eCollection 2021.