Zhanel G G, Saunders D G, Hoban D J, Karlowsky J A
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Jul;45(7):2018-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2018-2022.2001.
Antifungal susceptibilities (NCCLS, approved standard M27-A, 1997) were determined for the reference strain ATCC 90028 and 21 clinical isolates of Candida albicans with varying levels of fluconazole susceptibility using RPMI 1640 (RPMI) and 80% fresh human serum-20% RPMI (serum). Sixty-four percent (14 of 22) of the isolates tested demonstrated significant decreases (> or = 4-fold) in fluconazole MICs in the presence of serum, and the remaining eight isolates exhibited no change. Itraconazole and ketoconazole, two highly protein-bound antifungal agents, had MICs in serum that were increased or unchanged for 46% (10 of 22) and 41% (9 of 22) of the isolates, respectively. All 10 isolates tested against an investigational antifungal agent, LY303366, demonstrated significant increases in the MIC required in serum, while differences in amphotericin B MICs in the two media were not observed. Four of 10 isolates tested demonstrated fourfold higher flucytosine MICs in serum than in RPMI. Postantifungal effects (PAFEs) and 24-h kill curves were determined by standard methods for selected isolates. At the MIC, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, flucytosine, and LY303366 kill curves and PAFEs in RPMI were similar to those in serum. Isolates of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans required lower MICs in serum than in RPMI, without relative increases in fungal killing or PAFEs. Isolates tested against amphotericin B demonstrated significantly reduced killing and shorter PAFEs in serum than in RPMI without observable changes in MIC. In conclusion, antifungal pharmacodynamics in RPMI did not consistently predict antifungal activity in serum for azoles and amphotericin B. Generally speaking, antifungal agents with high protein binding exhibited some form of reduced activity (MIC, killing, or PAFE) in the presence of serum compared to those with low protein binding.
采用RPMI 1640培养基(RPMI)和80%新鲜人血清-20% RPMI培养基(血清),对参考菌株ATCC 90028以及21株白色念珠菌临床分离株进行抗真菌药敏试验(NCCLS,批准标准M27-A,1997),这些分离株对氟康唑的敏感性各不相同。在血清存在的情况下,64%(22株中的14株)受试分离株的氟康唑最低抑菌浓度(MIC)显著降低(≥4倍),其余8株无变化。伊曲康唑和酮康唑这两种高蛋白结合率的抗真菌药物,血清中的MIC分别在46%(22株中的10株)和41%(22株中的9株)的分离株中升高或无变化。针对一种研究性抗真菌药物LY303366进行测试的所有10株分离株,血清中所需的MIC均显著升高,而两性霉素B在两种培养基中的MIC未观察到差异。10株受试分离株中有4株血清中的氟胞嘧啶MIC比在RPMI中高4倍。通过标准方法对选定的分离株测定了抗真菌后效应(PAFE)和24小时杀菌曲线。在MIC浓度下,氟康唑、伊曲康唑、酮康唑、氟胞嘧啶和LY303366在RPMI中的杀菌曲线和PAFE与在血清中的相似。耐氟康唑的白色念珠菌分离株在血清中的MIC低于在RPMI中的,真菌杀伤或PAFE无相对增加。针对两性霉素B进行测试的分离株在血清中的杀伤作用显著降低,PAFE比在RPMI中短,而MIC无明显变化。总之,RPMI中的抗真菌药效学不能始终如一地预测血清中唑类药物和两性霉素B的抗真菌活性。一般来说,与低蛋白结合率的抗真菌药物相比,高蛋白结合率的抗真菌药物在血清存在时表现出某种形式的活性降低(MIC、杀伤或PAFE)。