• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将去神经支配的胃作为食管替代物暴露于胆汁中。

Bile exposure of the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute.

作者信息

Gutschow C A, Collard J M, Romagnoli R, Michel J M, Salizzoni M, Hölscher A H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jun;71(6):1786-91. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02535-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02535-8
PMID:11426748
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both the supine position and the existence of a gastric drainage procedure are suspected to promote reflux of duodenal juice into the denervated intrathoracic stomach. Erythromycin has been shown to weaken pyloric resistance to gastric outflow and to enhance antral motility, gastric emptying, and gallbladder contractility.

METHODS

The presence of bile in the gastric transplant of 79 patients was monitored over a 24-hour period with use of the Bilitec 2000 optoelectronic device 3 to 195 months after subtotal esophagectomy. Ten patients were reinvestigated after a 3-year period. Five groups were studied: group I: n = 12, no gastric drainage, never given erythromycin, group 2: n = 40, gastric drainage, never given erythromycin, group 3: n = 7, no gastric drainage, given erythromycin, group 4: n = 13, gastric drainage, given erythromycin, and group 5: n = 7, no longer given erythromycin (with or without gastric drainage). The percentage of time gastric bile absorbance was more than 0.25 was calculated for the total, supine, and upright periods of recording in reference to data from 25 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

The Bilitec test was pathologic in 9 of the 12 patients of group 1 whereas it was normal in three. Gastric exposure to bile was longer in group I patients than in controls for the total (p = 0.012) and supine (0.036) periods, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for the upright period (p = 0.080). Bile exposure in group 4 did not significantly differ from controls (total: p = 0.701; supine: p = 0.124; upright: p = 0.712). Bile exposure for the total period did not significantly differ whether patients were taking erythromycin or the drug had been discontinued at the time of the study (p = 0.234); and it tended to decrease with time in patients investigated twice (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric exposure to bile after truncal vagotomy and transposition of the stomach up to the neck is pathologic in three quarters of patients. It is more marked in the supine than in the upright position and tends to decrease with time. The addition of a gastric drainage procedure in combination with erythromycin therapy tends to normalize gastric exposure to bile. The effects of erythromycin may persist after discontinuation of the drug.

摘要

背景

仰卧位和胃引流操作均被怀疑会促使十二指肠液反流至去神经支配的胸腔内胃。已证实红霉素可减弱幽门对胃流出道的阻力,并增强胃窦蠕动、胃排空及胆囊收缩力。

方法

在79例患者行食管次全切除术后3至195个月期间,使用Bilitec 2000光电设备对其胃移植体中的胆汁存在情况进行24小时监测。10例患者在3年后再次接受检查。研究分为五组:第一组:n = 12,未行胃引流,从未使用过红霉素;第二组:n = 40,行胃引流,从未使用过红霉素;第三组:n = 7,未行胃引流,使用过红霉素;第四组:n = 13,行胃引流,使用过红霉素;第五组:n = 7,不再使用红霉素(无论有无胃引流)。参照25名健康志愿者的数据,计算记录的总时间段、仰卧位时间段和直立位时间段内胃胆汁吸光度大于0.25的时间百分比。

结果

第一组12例患者中有9例Bilitec检测结果异常,3例正常。第一组患者胃内胆汁暴露时间在总时间段(p = 0.012)和仰卧位时间段(0.036)均长于对照组,但在直立位时间段差异无统计学意义(p = 0.080)。第四组的胆汁暴露情况与对照组无显著差异(总时间段:p = 0.701;仰卧位:p = 0.124;直立位:p = 0.712)。无论患者在研究时正在服用红霉素还是已停药,总时间段内的胆汁暴露情况均无显著差异(p = 0.234);在接受两次检查的患者中,胆汁暴露情况有随时间减少的趋势(p = 0.046)。

结论

在胃迷走神经切断术及胃上提至颈部术后,四分之三的患者胃内胆汁暴露情况异常。仰卧位时比直立位更明显,且有随时间减少的趋势。胃引流操作联合红霉素治疗倾向于使胃内胆汁暴露情况恢复正常。停药后红霉素的作用可能仍会持续。

相似文献

1
Bile exposure of the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute.将去神经支配的胃作为食管替代物暴露于胆汁中。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jun;71(6):1786-91. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02535-8.
2
Combined 24-hour intraluminal pH and bile monitoring of the denervated whole stomach as an esophageal substitute.作为食管替代物的去神经全胃24小时腔内pH值和胆汁联合监测
Hepatogastroenterology. 1999 Jan-Feb;46(25):86-91.
3
Denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute recovers intraluminal acidity with time.去神经支配的胃作为食管替代物,其腔内酸度会随时间恢复。
Ann Surg. 2001 Apr;233(4):509-14. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00005.
4
Erythromycin enhances early postoperative contractility of the denervated whole stomach as an esophageal substitute.红霉素可增强去神经全胃作为食管替代物的术后早期收缩力。
Ann Surg. 1999 Mar;229(3):337-43. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199903000-00006.
5
Roux-en-Y jejunal loop and bile reflux.Roux-en-Y空肠袢与胆汁反流。
Am J Surg. 2000 Apr;179(4):298-303. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00326-3.
6
What is the difference between proximal and total gastrectomy regarding postoperative bile reflux into the oesophagus?近端胃切除术和全胃切除术在术后胆汁反流至食管方面有何差异?
Dig Surg. 2006;23(5-6):325-30. doi: 10.1159/000097948. Epub 2006 Dec 12.
7
Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.幽门引流术对食管胃转流重建术后胃排空及胆汁反流的影响
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;392(2):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0119-4. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
8
Erythromycin stimulates gastric emptying after esophagectomy with gastric replacement: a randomized clinical trial.胃代食管切除术后红霉素刺激胃排空:一项随机临床试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Mar;111(3):649-54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70318-5.
9
The denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute is a contractile organ.去神经支配的胃作为食管替代物是一个可收缩的器官。
Ann Surg. 1998 Jan;227(1):33-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199801000-00005.
10
Effect of erythromycin and cisapride on emptying of the vagally denervated intrathoracic stomach.红霉素和顺阿曲库铵对去迷走神经支配的胸内胃排空的影响。
Trop Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul-Sep;23(3):122-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Double tract-like gastric tube reconstruction decreases the incidences of delayed gastric emptying and bile reflux after esophagectomy: results of a pilot study of an experimental technique.双管型胃管重建术降低了食管癌术后胃排空延迟和胆汁反流的发生率:一项实验技术的初步研究结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Jun;407(4):1431-1439. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02461-4. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
2
Functional syndromes and symptom-orientated aftercare after esophagectomy.食管切除术后的功能性综合征和症状导向的康复治疗。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Nov;406(7):2249-2261. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02203-y. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Reflux Following Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
食管癌食管切除术后的反流
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug 5;53(4):217-221. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.4.217.
4
Gastric Outlet Obstruction After Esophagectomy: Retrospective Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Postoperative Endoscopic Pyloric Dilatation.食管癌切除术后胃出口梗阻:术后内镜下幽门扩张术有效性和安全性的回顾性分析
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2405-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3575-1.
5
A flow visualization model of duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy with gastric interposition.胃代食管食管癌切除术后十二指肠-胃反流的血流可视化模型
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Sep 25;8:192. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-192.
6
Preoperative gastric acid secretion and the risk to develop Barrett's esophagus after esophagectomy for chagasic achalasia.术前胃酸分泌与食管切除术后因恰加斯病导致巴雷特食管发生的风险。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Nov;13(11):1893-8; discussion 1898-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1003-7. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
7
Duodenal switch operation for pathologic transpyloric duodenogastric reflux.针对病理性经幽门十二指肠-胃反流的十二指肠转流手术。
Ann Surg. 2007 Feb;245(2):247-53. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000242714.59254.0e.
8
Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.幽门引流术对食管胃转流重建术后胃排空及胆汁反流的影响
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;392(2):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0119-4. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
9
Effect of "white diet" during bile monitoring with Bilitec 2000 on esophageal pH-metry in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.使用Bilitec 2000进行胆汁监测期间“白色饮食”对胃食管反流病患者食管pH值测定的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Apr;9(4):508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.035.
10
Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction.食管切除及胃上提术后的十二指肠-胃反流:重建路径的影响
World J Surg. 2005 Feb;29(2):174-81. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7568-0.