Archer J
Department of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Psychol Bull. 2001 Jul;127(4):554-60. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.554.
G. A. Bonanno and S. Kaltman's (1999) concentration on the grief work hypothesis in their review of perspectives on bereavement is only 1 aspect required for a comprehensive theory of grief, which should cover the following: the origin and adaptive significance of grief; the mechanism that initiates the grief response; the mechanism that leads to the resolution of grief; and sources of individual variation. Bonanno and Kaltman's replacement for grief work also emphasized cognitive restructuring, which can be contrasted with 2 alternative mechanisms, forgetting and engaging in new activities and relationships. M. S. Stroebe and H. A. W. Schut's (1994) dual process model, which involves cognitive restructuring and engaging in new activities, provides a broader alternative to grief work than that advocated by Bonanno and Kaltman.
G. A. 博南诺和S. 卡尔特曼在1999年回顾丧亲之痛的观点时专注于悲伤工作假说，这只是悲伤综合理论所需的一个方面，该理论应涵盖以下内容：悲伤的起源和适应性意义；引发悲伤反应的机制；导致悲伤解决的机制；以及个体差异的来源。博南诺和卡尔特曼对悲伤工作的替代观点也强调了认知重构，这可以与另外两种替代机制形成对比，即遗忘以及参与新的活动和建立新的关系。M. S. 斯特罗贝和H. A. W. 舒特在1994年提出的双重过程模型，涉及认知重构和参与新的活动，它为悲伤工作提供了一个比博南诺和卡尔特曼所倡导的更为宽泛的替代观点。
