Suppr超能文献

头孢唑林与头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的双盲比较。

Double-blind comparison of phlebitis produced by cefazolin versus cephalothin.

作者信息

Shemonsky N K, Carrizosa J C, Kaye D, Levison M E

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):481-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.4.481.

Abstract

In a double-blind study with each patient as his own control, 1 g of cefazolin and 2 g of cephalothin were administered intravenously every 6 h to 20 patients in opposite arms for a period of 48 h each. The degree of phlebitis was significantly more severe with cephalothin than with cefazolin (P < 0.05); however, neither the incidence of phlebitis nor the time of onset of phlebitis was significantly different between the two drugs.

摘要

在一项以每位患者自身作为对照的双盲研究中,对20名患者的双臂分别每6小时静脉注射1克头孢唑林和2克头孢噻吩,各持续48小时。头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的严重程度显著高于头孢唑林(P<0.05);然而,两种药物的静脉炎发生率及静脉炎发作时间并无显著差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Cefazolin in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia.
J Infect Dis. 1973 Oct;128:Suppl:S382-5. doi: 10.1093/infdis/128.supplement_2.s382.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验