• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢噻吩输注使用缓冲和未缓冲稀释剂产生静脉炎的双盲比较。

Double-blind comparison of phlebitis produced by cephalothin infusions with buffered and unbuffered diluents.

作者信息

Carrizosa J, Levison M E, Kaye D

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Feb;5(2):192-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.5.2.192.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.5.2.192
PMID:4840431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC428942/
Abstract

In a double-blind study with each patient as his own control, a buffered and an unbuffered cephalothin solution was administered to 13 patients in opposite arms for a period of 48 h each. Neither the incidence of phlebitis nor the degree of phlebitis was different with the two diluents, and there was no difference in the time of onset of phlebitis.

摘要

在一项以每位患者自身作为对照的双盲研究中,给13名患者的双臂分别注射缓冲型头孢噻吩溶液和非缓冲型头孢噻吩溶液,每次注射持续48小时。两种稀释剂引发静脉炎的发生率和严重程度均无差异,静脉炎的发作时间也无差异。

相似文献

1
Double-blind comparison of phlebitis produced by cephalothin infusions with buffered and unbuffered diluents.头孢噻吩输注使用缓冲和未缓冲稀释剂产生静脉炎的双盲比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Feb;5(2):192-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.5.2.192.
2
Significant reduction in the incidence of phlebitis with buffered versus unbuffered cephalothin.与未缓冲的头孢噻吩相比,缓冲后的头孢噻吩静脉炎发生率显著降低。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):646-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.646.
3
Double-blind controlled comparison of phlebitis produced by cephapirin and cephalothin.头孢匹林与头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的双盲对照比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Feb;3(2):306-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.2.306.
4
Double-blind comparison of phlebitis produced by cefazolin versus cephalothin.头孢唑林与头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的双盲比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):481-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.4.481.
5
Comparative incidence of phlebitis due to buffered cephalothin, cephapirin, and cefamandole.头孢噻吩钠、头孢匹林和头孢孟多所致静脉炎的比较发病率。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):575-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.575.
6
Double-blind comparison of phlebitis associated with cefazolin and cephalothin.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1976 Jul;14(1):75-7.
7
Double-blind study to investigate methods to prevent cephalothin-induced phlebitis.双盲研究以探究预防头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的方法。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1977 Jan;34(1):29-34.
8
Effect of buffering on the incidence and severity of cephalothin-induced phlebitis.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1974 Mar;31(3):266-8.
9
Phlebitis associated with the intravenous use of cephalothin and cephapirin.与静脉使用头孢噻吩和头孢匹林相关的静脉炎。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1976 Jul;33(7):642-4.
10
Comparison of phlebitis produced by cephapirin and cephalothin.头孢匹林和头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):722-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.722.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential for extending survival of peripheral intravenous infusions.延长外周静脉输液存活时间的潜力。
BMJ. 1992 Mar 7;304(6827):619-24. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.619.
2
Significant reduction in the incidence of phlebitis with buffered versus unbuffered cephalothin.与未缓冲的头孢噻吩相比,缓冲后的头孢噻吩静脉炎发生率显著降低。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):646-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.646.
3
Comparative incidence of phlebitis due to buffered cephalothin, cephapirin, and cefamandole.头孢噻吩钠、头孢匹林和头孢孟多所致静脉炎的比较发病率。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):575-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.575.

本文引用的文献

1
Double-blind controlled comparison of phlebitis produced by cephapirin and cephalothin.头孢匹林与头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的双盲对照比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Feb;3(2):306-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.2.306.