头孢噻吩输注使用缓冲和未缓冲稀释剂产生静脉炎的双盲比较。
Double-blind comparison of phlebitis produced by cephalothin infusions with buffered and unbuffered diluents.
作者信息
Carrizosa J, Levison M E, Kaye D
出版信息
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Feb;5(2):192-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.5.2.192.
Abstract
In a double-blind study with each patient as his own control, a buffered and an unbuffered cephalothin solution was administered to 13 patients in opposite arms for a period of 48 h each. Neither the incidence of phlebitis nor the degree of phlebitis was different with the two diluents, and there was no difference in the time of onset of phlebitis.
摘要
在一项以每位患者自身作为对照的双盲研究中，给13名患者的双臂分别注射缓冲型头孢噻吩溶液和非缓冲型头孢噻吩溶液，每次注射持续48小时。两种稀释剂引发静脉炎的发生率和严重程度均无差异，静脉炎的发作时间也无差异。
相似文献
1
Double-blind comparison of phlebitis produced by cephalothin infusions with buffered and unbuffered diluents.头孢噻吩输注使用缓冲和未缓冲稀释剂产生静脉炎的双盲比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Feb;5(2):192-3. doi: 10.1128/AAC.5.2.192.
2
Significant reduction in the incidence of phlebitis with buffered versus unbuffered cephalothin.与未缓冲的头孢噻吩相比，缓冲后的头孢噻吩静脉炎发生率显著降低。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):646-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.646.
3
Double-blind controlled comparison of phlebitis produced by cephapirin and cephalothin.头孢匹林与头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的双盲对照比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Feb;3(2):306-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.2.306.
4
Double-blind comparison of phlebitis produced by cefazolin versus cephalothin.头孢唑林与头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的双盲比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Apr;7(4):481-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.4.481.
5
Comparative incidence of phlebitis due to buffered cephalothin, cephapirin, and cefamandole.头孢噻吩钠、头孢匹林和头孢孟多所致静脉炎的比较发病率。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):575-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.575.
6
Double-blind comparison of phlebitis associated with cefazolin and cephalothin.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1976 Jul;14(1):75-7.
7
Double-blind study to investigate methods to prevent cephalothin-induced phlebitis.双盲研究以探究预防头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的方法。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1977 Jan;34(1):29-34.
8
Effect of buffering on the incidence and severity of cephalothin-induced phlebitis.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1974 Mar;31(3):266-8.
9
Phlebitis associated with the intravenous use of cephalothin and cephapirin.与静脉使用头孢噻吩和头孢匹林相关的静脉炎。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1976 Jul;33(7):642-4.
10
Comparison of phlebitis produced by cephapirin and cephalothin.头孢匹林和头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):722-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.722.
引用本文的文献
1
Potential for extending survival of peripheral intravenous infusions.延长外周静脉输液存活时间的潜力。
BMJ. 1992 Mar 7;304(6827):619-24. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.619.
2
Significant reduction in the incidence of phlebitis with buffered versus unbuffered cephalothin.与未缓冲的头孢噻吩相比，缓冲后的头孢噻吩静脉炎发生率显著降低。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):646-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.646.
3
Comparative incidence of phlebitis due to buffered cephalothin, cephapirin, and cefamandole.头孢噻吩钠、头孢匹林和头孢孟多所致静脉炎的比较发病率。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):575-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.575.
本文引用的文献
1
Double-blind controlled comparison of phlebitis produced by cephapirin and cephalothin.头孢匹林与头孢噻吩所致静脉炎的双盲对照比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Feb;3(2):306-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.2.306.
Zotero 插件