Hugdahl K, Rosén G, Ersland L, Lundervold A, Smievoll A I, Barndon R, Thomsen T
Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
Scand J Psychol. 2001 Jul;42(3):269-75. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00236.
The present paper reviews data from two previous studies in our laboratory, as well as some additional new data, on the neuronal representation of movement and pain imagery in a subject with an amputated right arm. The subject imagined painful and non-painful finger movements in the amputated stump while being in a MRI scanner, acquiring EPI-images for fMRI analysis. In Study I (Ersland et al., 1996) the Subject alternated tapping with his intact left hand fingers and imagining "tapping" with the fingers of his amputated right arm. The results showed increased neuronal activation in the right motor cortex (precentral gyrus) when tapping with the fingers of the left hand, and a corresponding activation in the left motor cortex when imagining tapping with the fingers of the amputated right arm. Finger tappings of the intact left hand fingers also resulted in a larger activated precentral area than imagery "finger tapping" of the amputated right arm fingers. In Study II (Rosen et al., 2001 in press) the same subject imagining painful and pleasurable finger movements, and still positions of the fingers of the amputated arm. The results showed larger activations over the motor cortex for movement imagining versus imagining the hand being in a still position, and larger activations over the sensory cortex when imagining painful experiences. It can therefore be concluded that not only does imagery activate the same motor areas as real finger movements, but also that adding instructions of pain together with imaging moving the fingers intensified the activation compared with adding instructions about non-painful experiences. From these studies, it is clear that areas activated during actual motor execution to a large extent also are activated during mental imagery of the same motor commands. In this respect the present studies add to studies of visual imagery that have shown a similar correspondence in activation between actual object perception and imagery of the same object.
本文回顾了我们实验室之前两项研究的数据,以及一些新的额外数据,这些数据是关于一名右臂截肢患者运动和疼痛想象的神经元表征。该患者在处于磁共振成像扫描仪中时,想象在截肢残端进行疼痛和非疼痛的手指运动,同时采集回波平面成像(EPI)图像用于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)分析。在研究I(厄斯兰等人,1996年)中,受试者交替用其完好的左手手指轻敲,并想象用其截肢的右臂手指“轻敲”。结果显示,用左手手指轻敲时,右侧运动皮层(中央前回)的神经元激活增加,而想象用截肢的右臂手指轻敲时,左侧运动皮层有相应的激活。完好的左手手指轻敲也比截肢的右臂手指的想象“手指轻敲”导致更大的中央前区激活。在研究II(罗森等人,2001年即将发表)中,同一受试者想象疼痛和愉悦的手指运动,以及截肢手臂手指的静止姿势。结果显示,与想象手处于静止姿势相比,运动想象时运动皮层的激活更大,而想象疼痛体验时感觉皮层的激活更大。因此可以得出结论,不仅想象激活的运动区域与实际手指运动相同,而且与添加关于非疼痛体验的指令相比,添加疼痛指令并想象手指移动会增强激活。从这些研究中可以清楚地看出,在实际运动执行过程中激活的区域在很大程度上在相同运动指令的心理想象过程中也会被激活。在这方面,本研究补充了视觉想象的研究,这些研究表明在实际物体感知和同一物体的想象之间的激活存在类似的对应关系。