O'Connor C M, Gattis W A, Hellkamp A S, Langer A, Larsen R L, Harrington R A, Berkowitz S D, O'Gara P T, Kopecky S L, Gheorghiade M, Daly R, Califf R M, Fuster V
Department of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Sep 1;88(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01735-0.
The Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study demonstrated that combination treatment with fixed dose warfarin (1 or 3 mg) + aspirin 80 mg was not superior to aspirin 160 mg alone after myocardial infarction for reducing nonfatal reinfarction, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death. In this analysis, we examined the importance of aspirin dose in the protection against the secondary end point of ischemic stroke. The comparison arms for this analysis were warfarin 1 mg + aspirin 80 mg versus aspirin 160 mg. In the Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study, 2,028 patients were randomized to aspirin 80 mg plus warfarin 1 mg, and 3,393 were randomized to aspirin 160 mg alone. A predictive model for ischemic stroke was developed using the Cox proportional-hazards model. A reduced Cox proportional-hazards model was developed to test for the effect of aspirin dose on ischemic stroke in predefined subgroups. The incidence of ischemic stroke was lower in patients treated with aspirin 160 mg than in patients treated with aspirin 80 mg + warfarin 1 mg (0.6% vs 1.1%; p = 0.0534). Age, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, and aspirin dose were independent predictors of ischemic stroke. In addition, the highest risk patients, those with Q-wave myocardial infarction and male patients, appeared to receive greater benefit from aspirin 160 mg than from aspirin 80 mg + warfarin 1 mg. The results of this secondary analysis suggest that aspirin 160 mg is more effective than aspirin 80 mg + warfarin 1 mg in preventing ischemic stroke in post-myocardial infarction patients.
华法林阿司匹林再梗死研究表明,心肌梗死后,固定剂量华法林(1或3毫克)加阿司匹林80毫克的联合治疗在降低非致命性再梗死、非致命性中风和心血管死亡方面并不优于单独使用160毫克阿司匹林。在本分析中,我们研究了阿司匹林剂量在预防缺血性中风次要终点方面的重要性。该分析的比较组为华法林1毫克加阿司匹林80毫克与阿司匹林160毫克。在华法林阿司匹林再梗死研究中,2028例患者被随机分配至阿司匹林80毫克加华法林1毫克组,3393例患者被随机分配至单独使用阿司匹林160毫克组。使用Cox比例风险模型建立了缺血性中风的预测模型。开发了一个简化的Cox比例风险模型,以测试阿司匹林剂量对预定义亚组中缺血性中风的影响。接受160毫克阿司匹林治疗的患者缺血性中风发生率低于接受80毫克阿司匹林加1毫克华法林治疗的患者(0.6%对1.1%;p = 0.0534)。年龄、既往中风或短暂性脑缺血发作以及阿司匹林剂量是缺血性中风的独立预测因素。此外,风险最高的患者,即Q波心肌梗死患者和男性患者,似乎从160毫克阿司匹林中获得的益处大于从80毫克阿司匹林加1毫克华法林中获得的益处。这项二次分析的结果表明,在预防心肌梗死后患者的缺血性中风方面,160毫克阿司匹林比80毫克阿司匹林加1毫克华法林更有效。