Suppr超能文献

通过MB/BacT alert 3D瓶直接鉴定分枝杆菌:两种商业探针检测法的比较评估

Direct identification of mycobacteria from MB/BacT alert 3D bottles: comparative evaluation of two commercial probe assays.

作者信息

Scarparo C, Piccoli P, Rigon A, Ruggiero G, Nista D, Piersimoni C

机构信息

Regional Mycobacteria Reference Centre, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Virology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Sep;39(9):3222-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3222-3227.2001.

Abstract

The new INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria (Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium), a reverse-hybridization-based line probe assay, and the AccuProbe assay (Gen-Probe Inc., San Diego, Calif.) were applied to MB/BacT Alert 3D (MB/BacT) system (Organon Teknika, Boxtel, The Netherlands) culture bottles and evaluated for mycobacterial identification. From 2,532 respiratory and extrapulmonary specimens submitted for culture, 168 were flagged positive by the MB/BacT system and promptly evaluated for identification (within 24 h). Each of 163 vials grew one mycobacterial isolate, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (n = 73), M. avium complex (n = 3), M. avium (n = 8), M. intracellulare (n = 5), M. kansasii (n = 15), M. gordonae (n = 8), M. malmoense (n = 3), M. chelonae (n = 13), M. abscessus (n = 2), M. xenopi (n = 11), M. scrofulaceum (n = 2), M. fortuitum (n = 7), M. terrae (n = 3), M. simiae (n = 2), M. celatum (n = 3), M. flavescens (n = 1), M. interjectum (n = 1), M. bohemicum (n = 1), and M. pulveris (n = 2). Five cultures yielded mixed growth of two mycobacterial species: M. tuberculosis complex plus M. gordonae (n = 2), M. tuberculosis complex plus M. chelonae (n = 1), M. tuberculosis complex plus M. xenopi (n = 1), and M. avium plus M. chelonae (n = 1). In testing of one-isolate vials, both systems showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for all species and complexes for which they are licensed (nine for INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria versus six for AccuProbe). There were minor discrepancies in results for two isolates identified by INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria as M. avium - M. intracellulare - M. scrofulaceum (MAIS) complex and by AccuProbe as M. intracellulare. In testing of two-isolate vials, INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria correctly identified all isolates, while the AccuProbe assay failed to identify three M. tuberculosis complex isolates and one M. avium isolate. The AccuProbe assay was completed within 2 h, while INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria required a 6-h period. In our opinion, INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria offers the following advantages: (i) it contains a genus-specific probe that, in addition to being used in genus identification, may be used as an internal control for both the amplification and hybridization steps; (ii) it simultaneously identifies M. tuberculosis complex, MAIS complex, and seven other mycobacterial species, even from mixed cultures; (iii) its mycobacterial DNA amplification ensures reliable results independent from the concentration of viable microorganisms; and (iv) it genotypically identifies M. kansasii and M. chelonae. In conclusion, even though INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria is considerably less easy to use than AccuProbe, requiring personnel skilled in molecular biology techniques, it represents an excellent approach for routine identification of frequently encountered mycobacteria.

摘要

新型INNO - LiPA分枝杆菌检测法(比利时根特市Innogenetics公司产品)是一种基于反向杂交的线性探针检测法,将其与AccuProbe检测法(美国加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥市Gen - Probe公司产品)应用于MB/BacT Alert 3D(MB/BacT)系统(荷兰博克斯泰尔市Organon Teknika公司产品)的培养瓶,对分枝杆菌进行鉴定评估。在提交培养的2532份呼吸道和肺外标本中,有168份被MB/BacT系统标记为阳性,并立即(在24小时内)进行鉴定评估。163个培养瓶中每个都培养出一株分枝杆菌分离株,包括结核分枝杆菌复合群(n = 73)、鸟分枝杆菌复合群(n = 3)、鸟分枝杆菌(n = 8)、胞内分枝杆菌(n = 5)、堪萨斯分枝杆菌(n = 15)、戈登分枝杆菌(n = 8)、马尔默分枝杆菌(n = 3)、龟分枝杆菌(n = 13)、脓肿分枝杆菌(n = 2)、偶发分枝杆菌(n = 7)、土地分枝杆菌(n = 3)、猿分枝杆菌(n = 2)、塞拉分枝杆菌(n = 3)、淡黄分枝杆菌(n = 1)、插入分枝杆菌(n = 1)、波希米亚分枝杆菌(n = 1)和粉状分枝杆菌(n = 2)。5个培养物出现两种分枝杆菌的混合生长:结核分枝杆菌复合群加戈登分枝杆菌(n = 2)、结核分枝杆菌复合群加龟分枝杆菌(n = 1)、结核分枝杆菌复合群加偶发分枝杆菌(n = 1)以及鸟分枝杆菌加龟分枝杆菌(n = 1)。在单分离株培养瓶的检测中,两种系统对其获许可检测的所有菌种和菌复合群均显示出极佳的敏感性和特异性(INNO - LiPA分枝杆菌检测法针对9种,AccuProbe检测法针对6种)。对于INNO - LiPA分枝杆菌检测法鉴定为鸟 - 胞内 - 瘰疬分枝杆菌(MAIS)复合群而AccuProbe检测法鉴定为胞内分枝杆菌的两株分离株检测结果存在微小差异。在双分离株培养瓶的检测中,INNO - LiPA分枝杆菌检测法正确鉴定了所有分离株,而AccuProbe检测法未能鉴定出3株结核分枝杆菌复合群分离株和1株鸟分枝杆菌分离株。AccuProbe检测法在2小时内完成,而INNO - LiPA分枝杆菌检测法需要6小时。我们认为,INNO - LiPA分枝杆菌检测法具有以下优点:(i)它包含一个属特异性探针,除用于属鉴定外,还可作为扩增和杂交步骤的内部对照;(ii)它能同时鉴定结核分枝杆菌复合群、MAIS复合群以及其他7种分枝杆菌,即使是混合培养物也能鉴定;(iii)其分枝杆菌DNA扩增确保了结果的可靠性,与活微生物的浓度无关;(iv)它能对堪萨斯分枝杆菌和龟分枝杆菌进行基因分型鉴定。总之,尽管INNO - LiPA分枝杆菌检测法比AccuProbe检测法使用起来要困难得多,需要具备分子生物学技术的人员,但它是常规鉴定常见分枝杆菌的一种极佳方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验