• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴网络中的流动:肝淋巴管与肠淋巴管之间的相互作用。

Flow in lymphatic networks: interaction between hepatic and intestinal lymph vessels.

作者信息

Stewart R H, Laine G A

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4466, USA.

出版信息

Microcirculation. 2001 Aug;8(4):221-7. doi: 10.1038/sj/mn/7800081.

DOI:10.1038/sj/mn/7800081
PMID:11528530
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lymph from both the liver and intestine flows into the cisterna chyli. We hypothesized that increasing liver lymph flow would increase cisterna chyli pressure and, thereby, decrease intestinal lymph flow, potentiating intestinal edema formation.

METHODS

Anesthetized dogs were instrumented to measure and manipulate portal vein pressure and cisterna chyli pressure. The effects of directly increasing portal pressure with and without directly increasing cisterna chyli pressure on intestinal wet-to-dry ratio and intestinal ascites formation rate were determined. Target values for portal and cisterna chyli pressures were determined following elevation of inferior vena caval pressure to levels seen in patients with obstructive caval disease.

RESULTS

Direct elevation of portal pressure (P(port)) alone to 17.5 mm Hg caused a significant increase in intestinal wet-to-dry ratio (3.98 +/- 0.24 vs. 3.40 +/- 0.43) and the rate of ascites formation (0.36 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.05 +/- 0.03 mL/g dry wt/h). Simultaneous direct elevation of cisterna chyli pressure to 6.0 mm Hg and P(port) to 17.5 mm Hg caused further increases in intestinal wet-to-dry ratio (5.52 +/- 1.20) and ascites formation (0.57 +/- 0.11 mL/g dry wt./h).

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior vena caval hypertension increases liver lymph flow that elevates cisterna chyli pressure, which inhibits intestinal lymph flow and augments intestinal edema formation.

摘要

目的

肝脏和肠道的淋巴液均流入乳糜池。我们推测,增加肝脏淋巴液流量会增加乳糜池压力,从而减少肠道淋巴液流量,加重肠道水肿的形成。

方法

对麻醉的犬进行仪器安装,以测量和控制门静脉压力及乳糜池压力。测定在直接增加门静脉压力以及同时直接增加乳糜池压力的情况下,对肠干湿比和肠腹水形成速率的影响。在将下腔静脉压力升高至梗阻性腔静脉疾病患者所见水平后,确定门静脉和乳糜池压力的目标值。

结果

仅将门静脉压力(P(port))直接升高至17.5 mmHg,会导致肠干湿比显著增加(3.98±0.24对3.40±0.43)以及腹水形成速率增加(0.36±0.12对0.05±0.03 mL/g干重/h)。同时将乳糜池压力直接升高至6.0 mmHg且将P(port)升高至17.5 mmHg,会使肠干湿比进一步增加(5.52±1.20)以及腹水形成增加(0.57±0.11 mL/g干重/h)。

结论

下腔静脉高压会增加肝脏淋巴液流量,进而升高乳糜池压力,这会抑制肠道淋巴液流量并加重肠道水肿的形成。

相似文献

1
Flow in lymphatic networks: interaction between hepatic and intestinal lymph vessels.淋巴网络中的流动:肝淋巴管与肠淋巴管之间的相互作用。
Microcirculation. 2001 Aug;8(4):221-7. doi: 10.1038/sj/mn/7800081.
2
Lymphatic drainage reduces intestinal edema and fluid loss.淋巴引流可减轻肠道水肿和液体流失。
Lymphology. 1998 Jun;31(2):68-73.
3
Increased abdominal lymph flow increases lung lymphatic outflow pressure in sheep.绵羊腹部淋巴液流量增加会提高肺部淋巴液流出压力。
Lymphology. 1994 Dec;27(4):189-92.
4
Effects of primary and secondary intra-abdominal hypertension on mesenteric lymph flow: implications for the abdominal compartment syndrome.原发性和继发性腹腔内高压对肠系膜淋巴液流动的影响:对腹腔间隔室综合征的意义。
Shock. 2005 Jun;23(6):571-5.
5
Lymphatic drainage of the peritoneal cavity in experimental ascites.实验性腹水时腹腔的淋巴引流
Acta Med Acad Sci Hung. 1975;32(3-4):337-48.
6
Analysis of intestinal microvascular permeability associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.与体外循环相关的肠道微血管通透性分析
J Surg Res. 1999 May 1;83(1):19-26. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1998.5550.
7
Effect of increased systemic venous pressure on thoracic duct and peripheral lymph flow in dogs.体循环静脉压升高对犬胸导管及外周淋巴液流动的影响
Lymphology. 1985 Jun;18(2):64-7.
8
Bronchovascular cuff formation and lung lymph flow in edema formation of anesthetized sheep.
Lymphology. 2009 Sep;42(3):112-22.
9
Transport of sodium by the renal lymphatics during elevated central venous pressures.中心静脉压升高时肾淋巴管对钠的转运
Invest Urol. 1968 Mar;5(5):483-91.
10
Interstitial fluid, lymph and oedema formation.组织液、淋巴与水肿形成
Acta Physiol Acad Sci Hung. 1980;56(4):367-78.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative fluid therapy impairs lymphatic pump function in male rats.围手术期液体治疗会损害雄性大鼠的淋巴泵功能。
Physiol Rep. 2025 Jun;13(11):e70389. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70389.
2
Cisterna chyli as an optimal marker of tolvaptan response in severe cirrhotic ascites.胸导管裂孔作为托伐普坦治疗严重肝硬化腹水反应的最佳标志物。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 17;12(1):8124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11889-z.
3
A Modern View of the Interstitial Space in Health and Disease.健康与疾病状态下间质间隙的现代观点
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 5;7:609583. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.609583. eCollection 2020.
4
Non-contrast MR lymphography of the lymphatic system of the liver.肝脏淋巴系统的非对比 MR 淋巴造影术。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):5879-5888. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06151-6. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
5
Open abdomen critical care management principles: resuscitation, fluid balance, nutrition, and ventilator management.开放性腹腔的重症监护管理原则:复苏、液体平衡、营养及呼吸机管理。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Sep 3;2(1):e000063. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000063. eCollection 2017.
6
Functional adaptation of bovine mesenteric lymphatic vessels to mesenteric venous hypertension.牛肠系膜淋巴管对肠系膜静脉高压的功能适应性。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014 Jun 15;306(12):R901-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00185.2013. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
7
Mathematical model of blood and interstitial flow and lymph production in the liver.肝脏中血液、组织间液流动及淋巴生成的数学模型。
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2014 Apr;13(2):363-78. doi: 10.1007/s10237-013-0516-x. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
8
Adaptation of mesenteric lymphatic vessels to prolonged changes in transmural pressure.肠系膜淋巴管对跨壁压力长期变化的适应。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 Jul 15;305(2):H203-10. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00677.2012. Epub 2013 May 10.
9
Strategies for modulating the inflammatory response after decompression from abdominal compartment syndrome.从腹腔间隔室综合征减压后调节炎症反应的策略。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Apr 3;20:25. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-25.
10
Gastrointestinal lymphatics in health and disease.健康与疾病状态下的胃肠道淋巴管
Pathophysiology. 2010 Sep;17(4):315-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.09.003.