• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者提供服务的有效性的知识状况。

The state of knowledge of the effectiveness of consumer provided services.

作者信息

Solomon P, Draine J

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001 Summer;25(1):20-7. doi: 10.1037/h0095054.

DOI:10.1037/h0095054
PMID:11529448
Abstract

There is a mixed record of research on consumer delivered services. There has been a great deal of descriptive work that supports the feasibility of consumer provided services. Only a limited number of studies have been reported that focus on outcomes for people who receive services from consumers. This new literature is at a critical juncture. This paper examines the state of research on three types of consumer provided services-consumer operated services, consumer partnership services, and consumers as employees. All these service types include consumers as paid providers who deliver mental health services to others, not primarily for their own benefit. This excludes self-help programs. Research resources need to be focused less on consumer provided services as adjunctive to professional services and more on determining the effectiveness of stand-alone consumer provided services in order to develop evidence to influence policy decisions.

摘要

关于消费者提供服务的研究记录好坏参半。有大量描述性工作支持消费者提供服务的可行性。仅有数量有限的研究报告关注从消费者那里接受服务的人的结果。这一新兴文献正处于关键节点。本文考察了三种消费者提供服务的研究状况——消费者运营的服务、消费者合作的服务以及作为员工的消费者。所有这些服务类型都将消费者作为向他人提供心理健康服务的有偿提供者,而不仅仅是为了自身利益。这排除了自助项目。研究资源应减少聚焦于作为专业服务辅助手段的消费者提供服务,而应更多地关注确定独立的消费者提供服务的有效性,以便形成能影响政策决策的证据。

相似文献

1
The state of knowledge of the effectiveness of consumer provided services.消费者提供服务的有效性的知识状况。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001 Summer;25(1):20-7. doi: 10.1037/h0095054.
2
Consumer and carer perspectives in the development of a mental health research, treatment and teaching facility: A thematic analysis.消费者和护理人员对精神卫生研究、治疗及教学设施发展的看法:一项主题分析
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Sep;24(7):534-544. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12394. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
3
Not sick enough: Experiences of carers of people with mental illness negotiating care for their relatives with mental health services.病情还不够严重:精神病患者照料者在与心理健康服务机构协商为其亲属提供护理时的经历。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):403-411. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12399.
4
Consumer participation in mental health services: looking from a consumer perspective.消费者对心理健康服务的参与:从消费者视角审视
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2003 Aug;10(4):385-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.2003.00598.x.
5
Consumers as mental health providers: first-person accounts of benefits and limitations.作为心理健康提供者的消费者:关于益处与局限的第一人称叙述。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 Nov;25(4):397-411. doi: 10.1007/BF02287510.
6
How do consumer leaders co-create value in mental health organisations?消费者领袖如何在心理健康组织中共同创造价值?
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Oct;41(5):505-510. doi: 10.1071/AH16105.
7
Consideration of the influence of place on access to employment for persons with serious mental illness in northeastern Ontario.安大略省东北部地区对严重精神疾病患者就业机会获取的影响因素考量。
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:2034. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
8
The value of routine outcome measurement for consumers of mental health services: master or servant?心理健康服务消费者常规结果测量的价值:主人还是仆人?
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;54(4):317-27. doi: 10.1177/0020764008090285.
9
Consumer involvement in mental health education for health professionals: feasibility and support for the role.消费者参与针对卫生专业人员的心理健康教育:该角色的可行性与支持情况。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Dec;24(23-24):3584-93. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12957. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
10
Consumer participation in the planning and delivery of drug treatment services: the current arrangements.消费者参与药物治疗服务的规划与提供:当前的安排
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 Mar;27(2):130-7. doi: 10.1080/09595230701829397.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping review to evaluate the effects of peer support on the mental health of young adults.范围综述评估同伴支持对青年心理健康的影响。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):e061336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061336.
2
Training Peer Support Workers in Mental Health Care: A Mixed Methods Study in Central Catalonia.培训心理健康护理领域的同伴支持工作者:加泰罗尼亚中部的一项混合方法研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 8;13:791724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.791724. eCollection 2022.
3
Peer Education: Productive Engagement for Older African Americans in Recovery From Depression.
同伴教育:促进老年非裔美国人从抑郁中康复的有效参与。
Gerontologist. 2018 Sep 14;58(5):813-824. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx068.
4
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Influence of a Peer Run Warm Line Phone Service on Psychiatric Recovery.同伴运营的温暖热线电话服务对精神康复影响的纵向分析
Community Ment Health J. 2018 May;54(4):376-382. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0161-4. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
Does Stigma Towards Mental Illness Affect Initial Perceptions of Peer Providers?对精神疾病的污名化会影响对同伴提供者的初始认知吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2016 Mar;87(1):203-10. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9378-y.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness.一项针对严重精神疾病患者同伴支持的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Feb 14;14:39. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-39.
7
Statewide implementation of recovery support groups for people with serious mental illness: a multidimensional evaluation.为严重精神疾病患者在全州范围内实施康复支持小组:一项多维度评估。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct;40(4):391-403. doi: 10.1007/s11414-013-9351-1.
8
Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review of evidence and experience.严重精神疾病患者之间的同伴支持:证据和经验回顾。
World Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;11(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.009.
9
Lessons from peer support among individuals with mental health difficulties: a review of the literature.有心理健康问题者同伴支持的经验教训:文献综述
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2012;8:22-9. doi: 10.2174/1745017901208010022. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
10
Identifying barriers to mental health system improvements: an examination of community participation in assertive community treatment programs.确定精神卫生系统改进的障碍:对社区参与积极社区治疗项目的考察。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Nov 7;5(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-5-27.