• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶舱管理态度。

Cockpit management attitudes.

作者信息

Helmreich R L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 1984 Oct;26(5):583-9. doi: 10.1177/001872088402600510.

DOI:10.1177/001872088402600510
PMID:11536592
Abstract

Distinctions are drawn between personality traits and attitudes. The stability of the personality and the malleability of attitudes are stressed. These concepts are related to pilot performance, especially in the areas of crew coordination and cockpit resource management. Airline pilots were administered a Cockpit Management Attitudes questionnaire; empirical data from that survey are reported and implications of the data for training in crew coordination are discussed.

摘要

人格特质和态度之间存在区别。强调了人格的稳定性和态度的可塑性。这些概念与飞行员的表现相关,尤其是在机组人员协调和驾驶舱资源管理方面。对航空公司飞行员进行了驾驶舱管理态度问卷调查;报告了该调查的实证数据,并讨论了这些数据对机组人员协调培训的影响。

相似文献

1
Cockpit management attitudes.驾驶舱管理态度。
Hum Factors. 1984 Oct;26(5):583-9. doi: 10.1177/001872088402600510.
2
How effective is cockpit resource management training? Exploring issues in evaluating the impact of programs to enhance crew coordination.驾驶舱资源管理培训的效果如何?探讨评估旨在加强机组人员协作的培训项目影响时存在的问题。
Flight Saf Dig. 1990 May;9(5):1-17.
3
Outcomes of crew resource management training.机组资源管理培训的结果
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1991;1(4):287-300. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0104_3.
4
Research project evaluates the effect of national culture on flight crew behaviour.研究项目评估国家文化对机组人员行为的影响。
ICAO J. 1996 Oct;51(8):14-6.
5
Pilot personality and crew coordination: implications for training and selection.
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1991;1(1):25-44. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0101_3.
6
The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation.商业航空中机组资源管理培训的发展历程。
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9(1):19-32. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2.
7
Cockpit-cabin communication: II. Shall we tell the pilots?驾驶舱与客舱通信:II. 我们要告诉飞行员吗?
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1996;6(3):211-31. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0603_1.
8
Culture in the cockpit: do Hofstede's dimensions replicate?驾驶舱文化:霍夫斯泰德的维度是否具有重复性?
J Cross Cult Psychol. 2000 May;31(3):283-301. doi: 10.1177/0022022100031003001.
9
Does CRM training work?客户关系管理培训有效吗?
Air Line Pilot. 1991 May;60(5):17-20.
10
Selecting pilots with crew resource management skills.选拔具备机组资源管理技能的飞行员。
Int J Aviat Psychol. 2000 Oct;10(4):377-92. doi: 10.1207/S15327108IJAP1004_5.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety culture in the operating room: translation, validation of the safety attitudes questionnaire - operating room version.手术室安全文化:安全态度调查问卷-手术室版本的翻译、验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 16;23(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09539-9.
2
The Greek versions of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire and Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire "short form".《团队 STEPPS 团队工作认知问卷》和《明尼苏达满意度问卷“短式”》的希腊语版本。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05451-8.
3
The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection.
基于二进制的模型(BBM)用于改进人为因素方法选择。
Hum Factors. 2021 Dec;63(8):1408-1436. doi: 10.1177/0018720820926875. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL).荷兰语版安全态度问卷(SAQ-NL)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1648-3.
5
Crew Resource Management in the Intensive Care Unit: a prospective 3-year cohort study.重症监护病房中的医护资源管理:一项为期3年的前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Nov;59(10):1319-29. doi: 10.1111/aas.12573. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
6
Exploring the relationship between safety culture and reported dispensing errors in a large sample of Swedish community pharmacies.探讨安全文化与瑞典大型社区药店报告配药错误之间的关系。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012 Aug 13;13:4. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-13-4.
7
Climate and cultural aspects in intensive care units.重症监护病房的气候和文化方面。
Crit Care. 2011;15(6):312. doi: 10.1186/cc10361. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
8
Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: a US multicenter study.重症监护病房安全文化与结局:一项美国多中心研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Jun;22(3):151-61. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq017. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
9
Measuring safety culture in the ambulatory setting: the safety attitudes questionnaire--ambulatory version.测量门诊环境中的安全文化:安全态度问卷——门诊版
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0114-7.
10
Patient safety in surgery.手术中的患者安全。
Ann Surg. 2006 May;243(5):628-32; discussion 632-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f.