• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨安全文化与瑞典大型社区药店报告配药错误之间的关系。

Exploring the relationship between safety culture and reported dispensing errors in a large sample of Swedish community pharmacies.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 570, Uppsala S-751 23, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012 Aug 13;13:4. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-13-4.

DOI:10.1186/2050-6511-13-4
PMID:22947078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3506269/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The potential for unsafe acts to result in harm to patients is constant risks to be managed in any health care delivery system including pharmacies. The number of reported errors is influenced by a various elements including safety culture. The aim of this study is to investigate a possible relationship between reported dispensing errors and safety culture, taking into account demographic and pharmacy variables, in Swedish community pharmacies.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed, encompassing 546 (62.8%) of the 870 Swedish community pharmacies. All staff in the pharmacies on December 1st, 2007 were included in the study. To assess safety culture domains in the pharmacies, the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was used. Numbers of dispensed prescription items as well as dispensing errors for each pharmacy across the first half year of 2008 were summarised. Intercorrelations among a number of variables including SAQ survey domains, general properties of the pharmacy, demographic characteristics, and dispensing errors were calculated. A negative binomial regression model was used to further examine the relationship between the variables and dispensing errors.

RESULTS

The first analysis demonstrated a number of significant correlations between reported dispensing errors and the variables examined. Negative correlations were found with SAQ domains Teamwork Climate, Safety Climate, Job Satisfaction as well as mean age and response rates. Positive relationships were demonstrated with Stress Recognition (SAQ), number of employees, educational diversity, birth country diversity, education country diversity and number of dispensed prescription items. Variables displaying a significant relationship to errors in this analysis were included in the regression analysis. When controlling for demographic variables, only Stress Recognition, mean age, educational diversity and number of dispensed prescription items and employees, were still associated with dispensing errors.

CONCLUSION

This study replicated previous work linking safety to errors, but went one step further and controlled for a variety of variables. Controlling rendered the relationship between Safety Climate and dispensing insignificant, while the relationship to Stress Recognition remained significant. Variables such as age and education country diversity were found also to correlate with reporting behaviour. Further studies on the demographic variables might generate interesting results.

摘要

背景

不安全行为可能对患者造成伤害,这是任何医疗保健系统(包括药房)都必须管理的固有风险。报告的错误数量受到多种因素的影响,包括安全文化。本研究旨在调查瑞典社区药房报告的配药错误与安全文化之间可能存在的关系,同时考虑人口统计学和药房变量。

方法

本研究采用横断面研究设计,涵盖了 2007 年 12 月 1 日瑞典 870 家社区药房中的 546 家(62.8%)。所有参与药房的员工均被纳入研究。为评估药房的安全文化领域,使用了安全态度问卷(SAQ)。对每家药房 2008 年上半年分发的处方项目数量和配药错误进行了总结。计算了包括 SAQ 调查领域、药房一般特征、人口统计学特征和配药错误在内的多个变量之间的相关性。使用负二项回归模型进一步研究了这些变量与配药错误之间的关系。

结果

首次分析表明,报告的配药错误与所检查的变量之间存在多项显著相关性。与 SAQ 领域团队合作氛围、安全氛围、工作满意度以及平均年龄和回应率呈负相关。与压力识别(SAQ)、员工人数、教育多样性、出生国家多样性、教育国家多样性和分发的处方项目数量呈正相关。在该分析中与错误相关的变量被纳入回归分析。在控制人口统计学变量后,仅压力识别、平均年龄、教育多样性以及分发的处方项目数量和员工人数仍与配药错误相关。

结论

本研究复制了之前将安全与错误联系起来的工作,但更进一步,控制了多种变量。控制后,安全氛围与配药错误之间的关系变得不显著,而与压力识别的关系仍然显著。年龄和教育国家多样性等变量也与报告行为相关。对人口统计学变量的进一步研究可能会产生有趣的结果。

相似文献

1
Exploring the relationship between safety culture and reported dispensing errors in a large sample of Swedish community pharmacies.探讨安全文化与瑞典大型社区药店报告配药错误之间的关系。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012 Aug 13;13:4. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-13-4.
2
Assessing safety culture in pharmacies: the psychometric validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in a national sample of community pharmacies in Sweden.评估药房的安全文化:瑞典社区药房全国样本中安全态度问卷(SAQ)的心理测量学验证
BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Apr 11;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-10-8.
3
Trends in dispensing errors reported in Finnish community pharmacies in 2015-2020: a national retrospective register-based study.2015-2020 年芬兰社区药店报告的配药错误趋势:一项全国回顾性基于登记的研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 23;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02428-y.
4
Pharmacists' assessment of dispensing errors: risk factors, practice sites, professional functions, and satisfaction.药剂师对配药错误的评估:风险因素、执业地点、专业职能及满意度
Pharmacotherapy. 2001 May;21(5):614-26. doi: 10.1592/phco.21.6.614.34544.
5
Safety culture perceptions of pharmacists in Malaysian hospitals and health clinics: a multicentre assessment using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire.马来西亚医院和健康诊所药剂师的安全文化认知:使用安全态度问卷的多中心评估
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 26;5(11):e008889. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008889.
6
Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmacies.社区药房配药差错发生率、性质及原因的前瞻性研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 May;14(5):327-32. doi: 10.1002/pds.1012.
7
A feasibility study for recording of dispensing errors and near misses' in four UK primary care pharmacies.英国四家基层医疗药房中配药错误及险些出错情况记录的可行性研究。
Drug Saf. 2003;26(11):803-13. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326110-00005.
8
Survey of dispensing error practices in community pharmacies in Finland: a nationwide study.芬兰社区药店配药差错操作调查:一项全国性研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Sep-Oct;49(5):604-10. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08075.
9
The relationships among work stress, strain and self-reported errors in UK community pharmacy.英国社区药房中工作压力、应变与自我报告错误之间的关系。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):885-895. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
10
Preventing medication errors in community pharmacy: frequency and seriousness of medication errors.预防社区药房的用药错误:用药错误的频率与严重程度
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):291-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018770.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the patient safety climate in community pharmacies: an updated national survey.衡量社区药房的患者安全氛围:一项最新的全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e088323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088323.
2
Patient safety culture among community pharmacists in Cairo.开罗社区药剂师的患者安全文化。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2023 May 16;98(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s42506-023-00136-6.
3
An assessment of safety culture in Saskatchewan community pharmacies.对萨斯喀彻温省社区药房安全文化的评估。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2020 Aug 5;153(5):280-286. doi: 10.1177/1715163520942736. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
4
Evaluation of patient safety culture among Malaysian retail pharmacists: results of a self-reported survey.马来西亚零售药剂师患者安全文化评估:一项自我报告调查的结果
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jul 25;10:1317-25. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S111537. eCollection 2016.
5
Safety culture perceptions of pharmacists in Malaysian hospitals and health clinics: a multicentre assessment using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire.马来西亚医院和健康诊所药剂师的安全文化认知:使用安全态度问卷的多中心评估
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 26;5(11):e008889. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008889.
6
Adaption and validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for the Danish hospital setting.《安全态度问卷》在丹麦医院环境中的适应性与验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 2;7:149-60. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S75560. eCollection 2015.
7
Trends in pharmacy staff's perception of patient safety in Swedish community pharmacies after re-regulation of conditions.
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2014 Oct;12(4):502. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552014000400010. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
8
Exploring safety systems for dispensing in community pharmacies: focusing on how staff relate to organizational components.探索社区药房配药安全系统:聚焦员工与组织构成要素的关系。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):216-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
9
Safety culture in a pharmacy setting using a pharmacy survey on patient safety culture: a cross-sectional study in China.利用药房患者安全文化调查问卷评估药房环境中的安全文化:一项中国的横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 30;4(6):e004904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004904.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing dispensing errors in Swedish pharmacies: the impact of a barrier in the computer system.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e22. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.031823.
2
Assessing safety culture in pharmacies: the psychometric validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in a national sample of community pharmacies in Sweden.评估药房的安全文化:瑞典社区药房全国样本中安全态度问卷(SAQ)的心理测量学验证
BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Apr 11;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-10-8.
3
Dispensing errors and counseling quality in 100 pharmacies.100家药店的配药错误与咨询质量
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Mar-Apr;49(2):171-80. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08130.
4
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006).挪威版安全态度问卷(SAQ)通用版(2006年简版)的心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-191.
5
Preventing medication errors in community pharmacy: frequency and seriousness of medication errors.预防社区药房的用药错误:用药错误的频率与严重程度
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):291-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018770.
6
Creating high reliability in health care organizations.在医疗保健机构中建立高可靠性。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1599-617. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00567.x.
7
Variation in caregiver perceptions of teamwork climate in labor and delivery units.分娩单位中护理人员对团队氛围认知的差异。
J Perinatol. 2006 Aug;26(8):463-70. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211556. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
8
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research.安全态度问卷:心理测量特性、基准数据及新兴研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 3;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44.
9
Readiness to report medical treatment errors: the effects of safety procedures, safety information, and priority of safety.报告医疗差错的意愿:安全程序、安全信息及安全优先级的影响
Med Care. 2006 Feb;44(2):117-23. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000197035.12311.88.
10
Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys.衡量患者安全氛围:调查综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):364-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014217.