Roy-Byrne P P, Katon W, Cowley D S, Russo J
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Harborview Medical Center, 325 9th Ave, Box 359911, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Sep;58(9):869-76. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.9.869.
Effectiveness studies have tested interventions to improve quality of care for depression in primary care, but none, to our knowledge, have been completed for panic disorder (PD) in this setting. This study sought to test the clinical effectiveness of PD pharmacotherapy embedded in a disease management framework of "collaborative care" (CC).
One hundred fifteen patients with PD from 3 primary care clinics were randomized to CC or "usual care" (UC). Patients in CC (n = 57) received educational videotapes and pamphlets; pharmacotherapy with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine; 2 psychiatrist visits and 2 telephone calls in the first 8 weeks; and up to 5 telephone calls between 3 and 12 months' follow-up. Usual care patients (n = 58) were treated by their primary care physician. Telephone assessments of panic, anxiety sensitivity, depression, and disability variables were performed at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months' follow-up. Adequacy of pharmacotherapy was assessed with an algorithm based on a review of efficacy studies.
Patients in CC were more likely to receive adequate (type, dose, duration) medication and more likely to adhere to this medication at 3 and 6 months. Random regression analyses showed that CC patients improved significantly more over time compared with UC patients on anxiety, depression, and disability measures, with the greatest effects at 3 and 6 months.
Compared with UC, CC interventions significantly improved both quality of care and clinical and functional outcomes in primary care PD patients. Clinical differences were greatest in the first 6 months, corresponding to the greater quality of care and the greater intensity of intervention.
有效性研究已对改善初级保健中抑郁症护理质量的干预措施进行了测试,但据我们所知,在这种情况下针对惊恐障碍(PD)的此类研究尚未完成。本研究旨在测试嵌入“协作护理”(CC)疾病管理框架中的PD药物治疗的临床有效性。
来自3家初级保健诊所的115名PD患者被随机分为CC组或“常规护理”(UC)组。CC组(n = 57)的患者接受教育录像带和宣传册;使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂帕罗西汀进行药物治疗;在最初8周内进行2次精神科医生问诊和2次电话随访;在随访的3至12个月期间最多进行5次电话随访。常规护理组(n = 58)的患者由其初级保健医生进行治疗。在随访的3、6、9和12个月时,对惊恐、焦虑敏感性、抑郁和残疾变量进行电话评估。基于疗效研究综述的算法评估药物治疗的充分性。
CC组患者更有可能接受足够(类型、剂量、持续时间)的药物治疗,并且在3个月和6个月时更有可能坚持用药。随机回归分析表明,与UC组患者相比,CC组患者在焦虑、抑郁和残疾测量方面随时间推移改善更为显著,在3个月和6个月时效果最为明显。
与UC相比,CC干预措施显著改善了初级保健PD患者的护理质量以及临床和功能结局。临床差异在最初6个月最大,这与更高的护理质量和更强的干预强度相对应。